Because you are always such a fair, objective poster who never gets in people's faces for almost nothing about once a day? Really?!?
I said that I see in your statement a lot of emotions that shouldn't be there for such a trivial thing as a sports forum, and I have always maintained the idea that I treat respectfully people that treat me the same way. Sad to read that from you, but then again, as you said, you are just a guy on the internet, and I don't owe you anything.
He could have killed that woman with this ball?!
Frustratingly dumb because he's come so close on so many other occasions but never learned the lesson. TBH not even the most egregious instance of him doing this that I've seen, and of course it happens to hit somebody in his best Slam draw in years
ерунда это все, где написано что в глотку все пиздец дисквалифай сразу? ..все зависело от ее реакции, можно и попасть в голову и посмеяться и играть дальше, в глаз тоже можно было попасть, то как она упала именно это и было причиной, страдания и боль, попало бы в шею и она бы не упала, по сути одно и то же было б,
What should or should not be here is none of your busine
No questions about the DQ. It was immediately obligatory and had to happen. But think about the eventual winner. Will he always have to live with the result of knowing the guy who was undefeated was eliminated in a fluke? Wouldn't any true fan have preferred to see Novak rightfully defeated in a close match? Or even having to default because of a physical problem from playing?
Nice attempt to change facts and violent irreponsible actions of the guilty.
I mean, it didn't have to happen... But as soon as she went down on the ground the chances for a different outcome became remote. In a different world where this hits her on the shoulder and she just shrugs it off we probably would've had threads saying Novak should have been disqualified and was given preferential treatment
Everything is flukey. Federer had an open court to win Wimbledon. Nope, a few inches off. Djoker mightve gone out with an injury today, anyway. There have been a handful of fairly recent finals affected by injury. Would Stan have beaten Nadal?Is injury an acceptable kind of fluke? Was Fed’s French Open worth less? What a boring post I’m sending here, I just realized.
This part is not a judgement call. It is specified exactly in the rule book:I understand the reason for disqualifying but taking all the other points that he won fair and square in the tournament is completely unjustified and unjustifiable. Anything to hurt his ranking by hook or by crook right?
Let's be clear. If a football player petulantly kicked the ball in the direction of an official and it hit them in the face/throat - then intentionally or unintentionally they would be gone. How do I know? Because I've seen it happen. Any "violent behaviour" such as kicking the ball at someone (even if it does not hit them) is a cardable offence. Players have been sent off for just putting their hands gently on the referee - it's a no go zone. Djokovic was way in the wrong and the punishment fits the crime. It wasn't intentional but it was petulant and reckless and to be honest he has plenty of form in this area.
what? snowflake like ewe would end up in hospital from such a fairy kiss
Lmao. I wouldn't put it past some Djokovic fans here to find out where she lives and...well...end her.
I would not call this gentle, but it certainly wasn't violent either. It was like a feed
Zidane was sent off but France wasn't disqualified. They sadly bottled the penalties but that's a different storyTell that to the people of France and Zinedane Zidane.
3rd vid was this incident
Tell that to the people of France and Zinedane Zidane.
