Diary of a Racketaholic

Power Player

Bionic Poster
It’s funny, sometimes I think about RossK popping in a few months ago and then the explosion of posts that occurred after. He has missed the H22/H19 madness, intense Babolat discussion, and potentially a small Prince resurgence. It will be a lot to digest, lol.
 

Vicious49

Legend
Back to frames, I’m not sure Why I even Bother trying other frames at this point as it’s going to be tough to replace the UT. I think it’s more of knowing for sure that a frame isn’t for me (that was the case with the Wilson Labs stuff) or doing more research to learn/confirm my preferences. At this point in my tennis journey I think I prefer thinner beamed 18/20 frames. I can play with something that has one and not the other but can’t do thicker beamed 16/19 frames For example.

The only frame I really want to demo at the moment is the 310 Iga stick. It’s 16/18 which is totally off for me but I still want to try it. Prince was my first nice racquet so I’m really hoping they can make a comeback although it doesn’t seem likely.
 

haqq777

Legend
It’s funny, sometimes I think about RossK popping in a few months ago and then the explosion of posts that occurred after. He has missed the H22/H19 madness, intense Babolat discussion, and potentially a small Prince resurgence. It will be a lot to digest, lol.
I unfortunately wasn't on the boards back when this thread was started, so I never really had a chance to have in-depth discussions with RossK but hear great things about him from some older members here like you and MD. Hoping he logs in a bit more regularly and I get a chance to interact a bit with him. Did he have some injury hence the hiatus or just life got in the way?
 

haqq777

Legend
By the way @haqq777 how are you getting along with your BPs? I tapped out and had to admit that I can't handle that frame.
They are great frames but having a bit of a tough time adjusting at the moment. Still, now that I am giving them my undivided attention after my Clash, I am slowly starting to figure them out better. Doesn't help that specs were off on both of mine and I need to figure out what to do with what frame to get most out of it for me. Either way, I see a lot of guys loving them and it is a great frame for whoever can wield it properly.
 

esm

Legend
Back to frames......
At this point in my tennis journey I think I prefer thinner beamed 18/20 frames.
Woo.. there are a few racquets you may want to try then.... the good old PT57A for an example 8-B

Prince CTS Approach MP was my first “nice/shiny” racquet back in the early 90 - played loads during my high school years. Loved it. I couldn’t find it anymore... I think it has gone walk about after so many house moves.
I have been on the look out for one of these on the bay.... hopefully one will turn up locally.
the only Prince I have are the orange/black O3 Tour MP - I still get one of them out sometimes - good memories, but I do not enjoy stringing them...:X3:
 

Power Player

Bionic Poster
Back to frames, I’m not sure Why I even Bother trying other frames at this point as it’s going to be tough to replace the UT. I think it’s more of knowing for sure that a frame isn’t for me (that was the case with the Wilson Labs stuff) or doing more research to learn/confirm my preferences. At this point in my tennis journey I think I prefer thinner beamed 18/20 frames. I can play with something that has one and not the other but can’t do thicker beamed 16/19 frames For example.

The only frame I really want to demo at the moment is the 310 Iga stick. It’s 16/18 which is totally off for me but I still want to try it. Prince was my first nice racquet so I’m really hoping they can make a comeback although it doesn’t seem likely.

The whole “cant do thicker beams” thing has been a thought process we have all gone through. I said the same thing, especially since I came back to tennis full time around 08 and was blown away that people were using Wilson Hammer looking things to compete at the highest levels.

It’s also many times, a mistake made by players who could really use the extra power in today’s game. A thinner beam 18x20 frame quite awesome (I have many, I used the Phantom 93 in Florida for a year) but the reality is this - if you want to use these frames, you will need higher weight and SW in order to get the same power the guy across from you is getting for free. You will not have nearly the same amount of racquet head speed (unless you are an experienced player with developed strokes) and your serve (most important shot) will not be as fast or heavy unless you really have it dialed in.You really need to have developed strokes and have played at least 4.5 tennis. Not just because that means you probably have some shot tolerance under pressure, but also because you will have faced other great players who will use lighter, more powerful frames and you will have to beat them with yours.

You can say that you don’t want to play tournaments or whatever other justification you‘d like but I’m just trying to fast forward you past your current mindset to save you some valuable time.

Trying the Prince tt100 is a positive step forward, IMO. It’s a racquet that makes way more sense for most rec players compared to using a pro stock UT (which is awesome, but not going to do you any favors at all out there). If you are going to try one, do not add leather, do not add lead. Just put everything else away for a while and go hit with it for a long time and get used to the lighter weight, the extra power and develop your technique to control it.
 

Power Player

Bionic Poster
I unfortunately wasn't on the boards back when this thread was started, so I never really had a chance to have in-depth discussions with RossK but hear great things about him from some older members here like you and MD. Hoping he logs in a bit more regularly and I get a chance to interact a bit with him. Did he have some injury hence the hiatus or just life got in the way?

I honestly am not sure. He was a true holic but I believed he has reformed a little and I think is using the DR98, which is a rather awesome frame to settle on. Maybe he can chime in upon his return If he sees this.
 

Hotpockets

Rookie
We'll see about that...not going to demo the new Radical Pro? :-D;)
One of the teaching pro in my club has a silver protype Radical Pro I saw yesterday. Had some orange string in it, probably new Lynx I am guessing. Looked so fantastic. I didn't get a chance to try it but the two people who tried it said it was amazing and played softer than you would expect.

Have you tried it by any chance? Thoughts?
 

Power Player

Bionic Poster
We'll see about that...not going to demo the new Radical Pro? :-D;)

lol..I doubt it. It doesnt really grab me from what I have seen. The tester Paint job is cool, but the one I saw in the catalog is a little underwhelming. If I did try a Radical, it would be the MP version. Thats probably one that would take rave reviews from other testers to get me interested though.
 

mscream

Professional
One of the teaching pro in my club has a silver protype Radical Pro I saw yesterday. Had some orange string in it, probably new Lynx I am guessing. Looked so fantastic. I didn't get a chance to try it but the two people who tried it said it was amazing and played softer than you would expect.

Have you tried it by any chance? Thoughts?

I haven't but there seems to be a bit of hype building up around that line now. The paint job will definitely be polarizing.
 

topspn

Legend
One of the teaching pro in my club has a silver protype Radical Pro I saw yesterday. Had some orange string in it, probably new Lynx I am guessing. Looked so fantastic. I didn't get a chance to try it but the two people who tried it said it was amazing and played softer than you would expect.

Have you tried it by any chance? Thoughts?
I think there is a new color coming for lynx tour which is that red or orange color.
 

mscream

Professional
Concerning the EZONE 98, I'm not sure to be honest what the advantages would be over the 100 version. The 98 doesn't really have the advantages that one would normally associate with a 98 inch version: improved feel, stability and control, at least not compared to the main 98/305 contenders. I strongly suspect that the 100 is more forgiving, easier to use and stable (need to steal PP's 100 to find out for sure lol). Obviously there are lots of people who beg to differ but personally I think compensating the reduction of SW with firming up parts of the frame is not the way to go in a <= 98 inch racquet; might as well use a proper 100 inch tweener then. Maybe we will get the word from PP on this, in case he decides to compare my 98 to his 100 tomorrow lol
 

Power Player

Bionic Poster
Concerning the EZONE 98, I'm not sure to be honest what the advantages would be over the 100 version. The 98 doesn't really have the advantages that one would normally associate with a 98 inch version: improved feel, stability and control, at least not compared to the main 98/305 contenders. I strongly suspect that the 100 is more forgiving, easier to use and stable (need to steal PP's 100 to find out for sure lol). Obviously there are lots of people who beg to differ but personally I think compensating the reduction of SW with firming up parts of the frame is not the way to go in a <= 98 inch racquet; might as well use a proper 100 inch tweener then. Maybe we will get the word from PP on this, in case he decides to compare my 98 to his 100 tomorrow lol

Yes we will do some switching so you can give some thoughts on this 100.
 

danbrenner

Legend
Can anyone hear shed some light on some thing that I had read recently in one of the threads on here it might’ve even been this thread but I’m just not sure. And I’m asking this not in the context of interest in his racket because I’m not interested I’m just more interested on if this is possible or not. So the question is Taylor Fritz is reported to be using A stock form 11 ounce radical midl plus. Is it humanly possible to play at his level with the weight of shot that he has, 140 mile an hour plus serves. With an 11oz frame. ?
No usually I would dismiss this is total nonsense but when I was reading this some very knowledgeable posters on these boards had confirmed it and that’s why I am asking this to you?
 

Power Player

Bionic Poster
Can anyone hear shed some light on some thing that I had read recently in one of the threads on here it might’ve even been this thread but I’m just not sure. And I’m asking this not in the context of interest in his racket because I’m not interested I’m just more interested on if this is possible or not. So the question is Taylor Fritz is reported to be using A stock form 11 ounce radical midl plus. Is it humanly possible to play at his level with the weight of shot that he has, 140 mile an hour plus serves. With an 11oz frame. ?
No usually I would dismiss this is total nonsense but when I was reading this some very knowledgeable posters on these boards had confirmed it and that’s why I am asking this to you?

Apparently the answer is - yes?
 

gutfeeling

Hall of Fame
Interestingly enough, the xl swings lighter than the most recent std length frame I got in too.
Different weight distribution. So the xl is listed at 300 gram, 32 cm like the standard but due to the added length it will be 2 points more head light and likely has less actual mass in the hoop (assuming the SWs are similar). My APDOs were XL and I had some of my best competitive results with that frame actually :p. Sorry if things just got a little murky, the standard is still a great stick!
 

gutfeeling

Hall of Fame
Can anyone hear shed some light on some thing that I had read recently in one of the threads on here it might’ve even been this thread but I’m just not sure. And I’m asking this not in the context of interest in his racket because I’m not interested I’m just more interested on if this is possible or not. So the question is Taylor Fritz is reported to be using A stock form 11 ounce radical midl plus. Is it humanly possible to play at his level with the weight of shot that he has, 140 mile an hour plus serves. With an 11oz frame. ?
No usually I would dismiss this is total nonsense but when I was reading this some very knowledgeable posters on these boards had confirmed it and that’s why I am asking this to you?
Custom layup and weight distribution. Example - my BP is 302 grams but has 310 SW so that’s roughly 340 SW strung when the total strung weight with overgrip is 324 grams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: esm

danbrenner

Legend
Custom layup and weight distribution. Example - my BP is 302 grams but has 310 SW so that’s roughly 340 SW strung when the total strung weight with overgrip is 324 grams.
I was under the impression that no matter how you distributed the weight. An 110z stick. And I do mean 11oz. Not 11.5. Not 11.3. 11 oz. would not be possible. No matter how you distribute. That’s what I would’ve thought so have you heard this as well?
 

JGads

G.O.A.T.
@Power Player I tried to take some vids but they never turn out very well. The angle is off, etc. I need to try to take my tripod out there again at some point and try again. But at this point I've settled on the UT. I'll still try other frames but I don't see anything surpassing the UT anytime soon. I'm stubborn and will think i can play with anything but will admit when it's too much for me (like with the BP).
Oh ok, you just said you videotaped yourself and saw stuff on your backhand so I was referring to that. It doesnt have to be high quality production. For example, Gads had some wall hitting vids that looked good.

I’ve been vidding myself to look at my form after the long layoff and could be better served by the tripod but have been resorting to propping the iPhone against a shoe or something. Here is a vid of me and Grandpa 104 a couple months ago when I first got it. Form is better at present because vids like this show me what I can’t see myself (for example not trusting the left/reconstructed knee, so I’m getting better and better about that and leaning in, not being on the back foot so much. Of course also, when the ball is coming at you off a wall you don’t have as much time to prep and drive. But I’m mitigating that a little bit by using de pressured balls on the wall)

 

pyrokid

Hall of Fame
The whole “cant do thicker beams” thing has been a thought process we have all gone through. I said the same thing, especially since I came back to tennis full time around 08 and was blown away that people were using Wilson Hammer looking things to compete at the highest levels.

It’s also many times, a mistake made by players who could really use the extra power in today’s game. A thinner beam 18x20 frame quite awesome (I have many, I used the Phantom 93 in Florida for a year) but the reality is this - if you want to use these frames, you will need higher weight and SW in order to get the same power the guy across from you is getting for free. You will not have nearly the same amount of racquet head speed (unless you are an experienced player with developed strokes) and your serve (most important shot) will not be as fast or heavy unless you really have it dialed in.You really need to have developed strokes and have played at least 4.5 tennis. Not just because that means you probably have some shot tolerance under pressure, but also because you will have faced other great players who will use lighter, more powerful frames and you will have to beat them with yours.

You can say that you don’t want to play tournaments or whatever other justification you‘d like but I’m just trying to fast forward you past your current mindset to save you some valuable time.

Trying the Prince tt100 is a positive step forward, IMO. It’s a racquet that makes way more sense for most rec players compared to using a pro stock UT (which is awesome, but not going to do you any favors at all out there). If you are going to try one, do not add leather, do not add lead. Just put everything else away for a while and go hit with it for a long time and get used to the lighter weight, the extra power and develop your technique to control it.
This is a thing I feel like I didn't understand when I first joined here, but I'm pretty sure nobody "prefers" thick beams

Everyone who uses them does so because they do things for us we can't get from thinner beam frames, but when comparing the way they move through the air and feel overall, it's just objectively worse with thicker beams. If there was a thin-beamed APD that still put the same hurt on the ball though, I would 100% switch.

Another funny thing I've been thinking about a lot is how much placebo can impact you with this stuff. My hitting partners have all commented by now that I play way better with the APDs, but they've also been telling me it's not possible it's the racquet making me play that much better - I'm just doing it myself because I love it so much. "You're the only person I've ever played who whacks a winner and attributes it entirely to the racquet"
 

pyrokid

Hall of Fame
Different weight distribution. So the xl is listed at 300 gram, 32 cm like the standard but due to the added length it will be 2 points more head light and likely has less actual mass in the hoop (assuming the SWs are similar). My APDOs were XL and I had some of my best competitive results with that frame actually :p. Sorry if things just got a little murky, the standard is still a great stick!
Do they actually change the frame? I thought Babolat just tacked an extra half inch onto the hairpin.
 

esm

Legend
The tester Paint job is cool, but the one I saw in the catalog is a little underwhelming.
I agree... the tester PJ seems cool in silvery grey with a splash of orange/coral.
I didn’t mind the coral PJ in the catalogue. Kinda reminded me of the AA salmon pink coloured Pro One...:love::laughing:
 

Vicious49

Legend
They are great frames but having a bit of a tough time adjusting at the moment. Still, now that I am giving them my undivided attention after my Clash, I am slowly starting to figure them out better. Doesn't help that specs were off on both of mine and I need to figure out what to do with what frame to get most out of it for me. Either way, I see a lot of guys loving them and it is a great frame for whoever can wield it properly.

Dont get me wrong, I think it’s an amazing frame. It has so much potential and I wish I could use it. it would just require too much change and effort for my part to do so. If I was playing competitively though (And was younger) I’d definitely try as hard as I could to make it work.

The whole “cant do thicker beams” thing has been a thought process we have all gone through. I said the same thing, especially since I came back to tennis full time around 08 and was blown away that people were using Wilson Hammer looking things to compete at the highest levels.

It’s also many times, a mistake made by players who could really use the extra power in today’s game. A thinner beam 18x20 frame quite awesome (I have many, I used the Phantom 93 in Florida for a year) but the reality is this - if you want to use these frames, you will need higher weight and SW in order to get the same power the guy across from you is getting for free. You will not have nearly the same amount of racquet head speed (unless you are an experienced player with developed strokes) and your serve (most important shot) will not be as fast or heavy unless you really have it dialed in.You really need to have developed strokes and have played at least 4.5 tennis. Not just because that means you probably have some shot tolerance under pressure, but also because you will have faced other great players who will use lighter, more powerful frames and you will have to beat them with yours.

You can say that you don’t want to play tournaments or whatever other justification you‘d like but I’m just trying to fast forward you past your current mindset to save you some valuable time.

Trying the Prince tt100 is a positive step forward, IMO. It’s a racquet that makes way more sense for most rec players compared to using a pro stock UT (which is awesome, but not going to do you any favors at all out there). If you are going to try one, do not add leather, do not add lead. Just put everything else away for a while and go hit with it for a long time and get used to the lighter weight, the extra power and develop your technique to control it.

i get it and I appreciate it but we all have to go through the journey ourselves. I do agree on serves that I can notice the UT doesn’t have the same speed And power as some other frames I’ve played with. I could add more lead and get there probably but I like everything else about it at the current specs.

Lol. Not sore how to interpret your answer. Have you heard this as well. Wouldn’t this be just about impossible ? 140 mph plus serves ??

I saw that Taylor Fritz comment you’re referring to as well. Cant recall which thread it was in though.
 

travlerajm

Talk Tennis Guru
God that would be hilarious. I will have mastered stealth switching at that point.
I think there could be untapped value in stealth switching. Sometimes, I will start out a match winning, but then after half a set my opponent starts playing better after adjusting and grooving to the type of ball I am hitting. Then when I switch to a racquet that produces a different type of ball (either more or less spin for the same stroke), it can throw off my opponent’s game even if I’m not actually playing better.
 

mscream

Professional
Of course also, when the ball is coming at you off a wall you don’t have as much time to prep and drive.

I actually find that to be a great way to really test racquets, particularly high static weight/SW ones. Half an hour all out against the wall to see if it you can swing it consistently very quickly without your arm falling off :laughing: A hitting partner that has a much higher level will achieve the same though.
 

JGads

G.O.A.T.
I actually find that to be a great way to really test racquets, particularly high static weight/SW ones. Half an hour all out against the wall to see if it you can swing it consistently very quickly without your arm falling off :laughing: A hitting partner that has a much higher level will achieve the same though.

True. Of course I’m switching to regular balls often to get actual ball feel vs de pressurized but when I’m just looking to get some hits in at the more comfy pace I go depressurized. nothing beats live humans though. Even if they are not as consistent as that damn wall.
 

Power Player

Bionic Poster
I think there could be untapped value in stealth switching. Sometimes, I will start out a match winning, but then after half a set my opponent starts playing better after adjusting and grooving to the type of ball I am hitting. Then when I switch to a racquet that produces a different type of ball (either more or less spin for the same stroke), it can throw off my opponent’s game even if I’m not actually playing better.

i think it matters the style. It could definitely work for your game. For me, i need consistency most of the time in my strokes so i have confidence togo for my shots.
 

808

Professional
I've been playing the Graphene 360 Extreme MP for the last few months and lately kind of switched to the new Extreme Tour, but I've always liked Pure Drives – my favourite so far being the black 2012 one – and always give their latest versions a try. There's something inherently beautiful about a racket that you can just grab off the shelf and play, and to me the Pure Drive is the very definition of a pick up and go racket. No mods needed, at least for a certain style of play. Plus its got heritage. So of course I had to buy the new one.

I used the TWE matching service when I ordered and of the 12 frames they specced, 9 frames were measured at 68 RA, 2 had 67 RA and 1 had 69 RA. Curious, as the official Babolat spec lists the frame at 72 RA unstrung. I've asked TWE if their RA is an estimate for the strung frame or if the frames indeed measured that low and will hopefully receive an answer on Monday. Or maybe it's just their RDC that's off.

Anyway, the new paint job is cool and all, alright, but what's more interesting to me are the new, longer bumpers that are slightly widened at 3 & 9, a tiny bit similar to the original Pure Drive.

36vuxfw.jpg


I got it strung with Hyper G 1.25 (due to @JGads vouching for it and from reading @Power Player's glowing posts about the PD/HG combo – thank you both, as I never played HG before) at 23kg.

First impressions, straight from the honeymoon: this is seriously one of the best and most enjoyable rackets I've played in quite a while. Better feel and touch than any Pure Drive in recent history, easy power and spin as you'd expect from a PD and surprisingly comfortable.

As with all Babolats, especially the power frames, you have to commit to your shots. A half hearted stroke will more than likely result in a flyer. Been there, done that. What really surprised me is the stability of this new Pure Drive. It lets you take the ball super early, half volleys are a dream. It just doesn't wobble or twist. It packs quite a bit more power than my Extreme Tour, 80% balls can be 50% balls with the PD, saving energy. Control is as expected – not pinpoint, sure, but more than sufficient for my game on clay courts. Touch is very good, but I can not say how much of that is due to the frame or the strings, as I've never played Hyper G before. Anyway, PP nailed it – HG 1.25 is an excellent fit for the new PD.

Woofer grommets – always a hot topic if not a bit overblown IMO on these boards – never bothered me much, to be honest. So the new one does not have woofers and that's ok, I guess. The response of the new PD is more traditional, yes, resulting in maybe a few less fliers, but I need more time with it to really gauge it.

The sweetspot is generous. Whats really interesting is that even on balls outside the sweetspot, like say a mistimed overhead I hit way high in the stringbed, there is basically zero bad vibration in the frame. It's really very well muted in this regard. Serves are not on the level of my Extreme Tour just yet, but that's to be expected on the first few outings. Nevertheless I can see great potential, especially for slice serves. Kickers worked well right away and flat serves clicked towards the end of the first session. Very pleased with that.

To sum it up I think both the Extreme Tour and this new PD will stay in my bag in the foreseeable future. The ET is just so versatile while the PD is just so much fun and easy to play with. Thing is legit.
 

Power Player

Bionic Poster
I've been playing the Graphene 360 Extreme MP for the last few months and lately kind of switched to the new Extreme Tour, but I've always liked Pure Drives – my favourite so far being the black 2012 one – and always give their latest versions a try. There's something inherently beautiful about a racket that you can just grab off the shelf and play, and to me the Pure Drive is the very definition of a pick up and go racket. No mods needed, at least for a certain style of play. Plus its got heritage. So of course I had to buy the new one.

I used the TWE matching service when I ordered and of the 12 frames they specced, 9 frames were measured at 68 RA, 2 had 67 RA and 1 had 69 RA. Curious, as the official Babolat spec lists the frame at 72 RA unstrung. I've asked TWE if their RA is an estimate for the strung frame or if the frames indeed measured that low and will hopefully receive an answer on Monday. Or maybe it's just their RDC that's off.

Anyway, the new paint job is cool and all, alright, but what's more interesting to me are the new, longer bumpers that are slightly widened at 3 & 9, a tiny bit similar to the original Pure Drive.

36vuxfw.jpg


I got it strung with Hyper G 1.25 (due to @JGads vouching for it and from reading @Power Player's glowing posts about the PD/HG combo – thank you both, as I never played HG before) at 23kg.

First impressions, straight from the honeymoon: this is seriously one of the best and most enjoyable rackets I've played in quite a while. Better feel and touch than any Pure Drive in recent history, easy power and spin as you'd expect from a PD and surprisingly comfortable.

As with all Babolats, especially the power frames, you have to commit to your shots. A half hearted stroke will more than likely result in a flyer. Been there, done that. What really surprised me is the stability of this new Pure Drive. It lets you take the ball super early, half volleys are a dream. It just doesn't wobble or twist. It packs quite a bit more power than my Extreme Tour, 80% balls can be 50% balls with the PD, saving energy. Control is as expected – not pinpoint, sure, but more than sufficient for my game on clay courts. Touch is very good, but I can not say how much of that is due to the frame or the strings, as I've never played Hyper G before. Anyway, PP nailed it – HG 1.25 is an excellent fit for the new PD.

Woofer grommets – always a hot topic if not a bit overblown IMO on these boards – never bothered me much, to be honest. So the new one does not have woofers and that's ok, I guess. The response of the new PD is more traditional, yes, resulting in maybe a few less fliers, but I need more time with it to really gauge it.

The sweetspot is generous. Whats really interesting is that even on balls outside the sweetspot, like say a mistimed overhead I hit way high in the stringbed, there is basically zero bad vibration in the frame. It's really very well muted in this regard. Serves are not on the level of my Extreme Tour just yet, but that's to be expected on the first few outings. Nevertheless I can see great potential, especially for slice serves. Kickers worked well right away and flat serves clicked towards the end of the first session. Very pleased with that.

To sum it up I think both the Extreme Tour and this new PD will stay in my bag in the foreseeable future. The ET is just so versatile while the PD is just so much fun and easy to play with. Thing is legit.

Nice - this PD is one of the best ones I can remember. We have the exact same setup, so I can relate to your experience with it.

It reminds me a lot of the Extreme Pro 2.0. I think due to the high twistweight. Only negative for me is the string spacing is a little wide and the control is not as precise as I prefer. I can still play with it really well so it's not a major issue. That said I am better matched to the Ezone 100, which also is a pick up and play frame as well. The Pd doesn't have the same precise control to it and eats strings faster.

BTW, I got some Hyper G soft and Ill put it in the Ezone and also the PD at some point. Interested in how it plays in both of these frames.
 

Power Player

Bionic Poster
Slightly random, but I got a Topspin Pro device. Mainly for my GF because it's super hard for me to teach her topspin and I am no tennis coach.

Anyway, I really like this thing for light practice. It will show tiny flaws in your strokes and help you get under the ball without thinking about it. Example of a tiny flaw for me is not keeping the wrist laid back quite long enough through contact now and then on my 2 handed backhand. Easily fixed by drilling on this thing.

Not a bad investment, especially for anyone in cold weather who wants to move around and drill in their house if they can't practice outside.
 

pyrokid

Hall of Fame
I've been playing the Graphene 360 Extreme MP for the last few months and lately kind of switched to the new Extreme Tour, but I've always liked Pure Drives – my favourite so far being the black 2012 one – and always give their latest versions a try. There's something inherently beautiful about a racket that you can just grab off the shelf and play, and to me the Pure Drive is the very definition of a pick up and go racket. No mods needed, at least for a certain style of play. Plus its got heritage. So of course I had to buy the new one.

I used the TWE matching service when I ordered and of the 12 frames they specced, 9 frames were measured at 68 RA, 2 had 67 RA and 1 had 69 RA. Curious, as the official Babolat spec lists the frame at 72 RA unstrung. I've asked TWE if their RA is an estimate for the strung frame or if the frames indeed measured that low and will hopefully receive an answer on Monday. Or maybe it's just their RDC that's off.

Anyway, the new paint job is cool and all, alright, but what's more interesting to me are the new, longer bumpers that are slightly widened at 3 & 9, a tiny bit similar to the original Pure Drive.

36vuxfw.jpg


I got it strung with Hyper G 1.25 (due to @JGads vouching for it and from reading @Power Player's glowing posts about the PD/HG combo – thank you both, as I never played HG before) at 23kg.

First impressions, straight from the honeymoon: this is seriously one of the best and most enjoyable rackets I've played in quite a while. Better feel and touch than any Pure Drive in recent history, easy power and spin as you'd expect from a PD and surprisingly comfortable.

As with all Babolats, especially the power frames, you have to commit to your shots. A half hearted stroke will more than likely result in a flyer. Been there, done that. What really surprised me is the stability of this new Pure Drive. It lets you take the ball super early, half volleys are a dream. It just doesn't wobble or twist. It packs quite a bit more power than my Extreme Tour, 80% balls can be 50% balls with the PD, saving energy. Control is as expected – not pinpoint, sure, but more than sufficient for my game on clay courts. Touch is very good, but I can not say how much of that is due to the frame or the strings, as I've never played Hyper G before. Anyway, PP nailed it – HG 1.25 is an excellent fit for the new PD.

Woofer grommets – always a hot topic if not a bit overblown IMO on these boards – never bothered me much, to be honest. So the new one does not have woofers and that's ok, I guess. The response of the new PD is more traditional, yes, resulting in maybe a few less fliers, but I need more time with it to really gauge it.

The sweetspot is generous. Whats really interesting is that even on balls outside the sweetspot, like say a mistimed overhead I hit way high in the stringbed, there is basically zero bad vibration in the frame. It's really very well muted in this regard. Serves are not on the level of my Extreme Tour just yet, but that's to be expected on the first few outings. Nevertheless I can see great potential, especially for slice serves. Kickers worked well right away and flat serves clicked towards the end of the first session. Very pleased with that.

To sum it up I think both the Extreme Tour and this new PD will stay in my bag in the foreseeable future. The ET is just so versatile while the PD is just so much fun and easy to play with. Thing is legit.
New PD is so good

I keep telling myself I'm pulling it out "to make sure my playtest is as honest as possible!!" but honestly a lot is that it's fun to hit with. Very relaxing tennis, you can just groove high percentage groundies all day long until you feel confident whacking some ludicrous shot you don't really have a right to outside a casual rally.

I don't remember other pure drives being this consistent for me, usually more random fliers.

I think this gen being as clunky as it is finally forced me to realize how to actually play pure drives, which helped.
 
Last edited:

808

Professional
Nice - this PD is one of the best ones I can remember. We have the exact same setup, so I can relate to your experience with it.

It reminds me a lot of the Extreme Pro 2.0. I think due to the high twistweight. Only negative for me is the string spacing is a little wide and the control is not as precise as I prefer. I can still play with it really well so it's not a major issue. That said I am better matched to the Ezone 100, which also is a pick up and play frame as well. The Pd doesn't have the same precise control to it and eats strings faster.

BTW, I got some Hyper G soft and Ill put it in the Ezone and also the PD at some point. Interested in how it plays in both of these frames.
Yeah, Hyper G Soft just started to become available a few days ago at TWE. I will likely try that in the future, but regular Hyper G in the PD wowed me so much that I ordered a reel yesterday.

I'm following your Ezone 100 escapade with interest, sounds like a fun racket.

I'v only hit various Ezone 98 versions, starting with the Ai I think, and could never really gel with these frames. Too headlight for my taste, my backhand never clicked. Plus the almost comically long handle (I play a one handed backhand). Tried the 98 Tour recently and despite its specs being a almost perfect fit I've found it rather average, quite disappointing really. So I'm hesitant to try yet another Ezone.
 

Power Player

Bionic Poster
Yeah, Hyper G Soft just started to become available a few days ago at TWE. I will likely try that in the future, but regular Hyper G in the PD wowed me so much that I ordered a reel yesterday.

I'm following your Ezone 100 escapade with interest, sounds like a fun racket.

I'v only hit various Ezone 98 versions, starting with the Ai I think, and could never really gel with these frames. Too headlight for my taste, my backhand never clicked. Plus the almost comically long handle (I play a one handed backhand). Tried the 98 Tour recently and despite its specs being a almost perfect fit I've found it rather average, quite disappointing really. So I'm hesitant to try yet another Ezone.

Cant go wrong with Hyper G in this Pure Drive. I think you have a great setup. If Soft is substantially better I will let you know, but I suspect it may break pretty fast in the PD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 808

tim-ay

Legend
Tour sniper is pretty killer in the new pure drive too. I strung it up at 50. Next time will take it up to about 53. The one area that’s bothering me is coming in on short balls and trying to bury the ball. I’ve had a few fly and felt like wtf was that. Pure drivish thing to have happen. But I think I bit higher tension and a little more focus from my dumb arse will bring that in.

surprisingly, I can switch between this and the clash 98 without a lot of trouble. I just think I need a little more tension in the pure drive ( at least with tour sniper ). It’s reallly a super frame.
 

808

Professional
The whole “cant do thicker beams” thing has been a thought process we have all gone through. I said the same thing, especially since I came back to tennis full time around 08 and was blown away that people were using Wilson Hammer looking things to compete at the highest levels.
Yeah, I remember when I was a wee little kid with a Puma Becker Junior in hand seeing these newfangled Kübler frames with their crazy thick beams pop up everywhere while only the most hardcore still clung to their standard-size adidas rackets of old. What a trip it's been.
 

JGads

G.O.A.T.
I've been playing the Graphene 360 Extreme MP for the last few months and lately kind of switched to the new Extreme Tour, but I've always liked Pure Drives – my favourite so far being the black 2012 one – and always give their latest versions a try. There's something inherently beautiful about a racket that you can just grab off the shelf and play, and to me the Pure Drive is the very definition of a pick up and go racket. No mods needed, at least for a certain style of play. Plus its got heritage. So of course I had to buy the new one.

I used the TWE matching service when I ordered and of the 12 frames they specced, 9 frames were measured at 68 RA, 2 had 67 RA and 1 had 69 RA. Curious, as the official Babolat spec lists the frame at 72 RA unstrung. I've asked TWE if their RA is an estimate for the strung frame or if the frames indeed measured that low and will hopefully receive an answer on Monday. Or maybe it's just their RDC that's off.

Anyway, the new paint job is cool and all, alright, but what's more interesting to me are the new, longer bumpers that are slightly widened at 3 & 9, a tiny bit similar to the original Pure Drive.

36vuxfw.jpg


I got it strung with Hyper G 1.25 (due to @JGads vouching for it and from reading @Power Player's glowing posts about the PD/HG combo – thank you both, as I never played HG before) at 23kg.

First impressions, straight from the honeymoon: this is seriously one of the best and most enjoyable rackets I've played in quite a while. Better feel and touch than any Pure Drive in recent history, easy power and spin as you'd expect from a PD and surprisingly comfortable.

As with all Babolats, especially the power frames, you have to commit to your shots. A half hearted stroke will more than likely result in a flyer. Been there, done that. What really surprised me is the stability of this new Pure Drive. It lets you take the ball super early, half volleys are a dream. It just doesn't wobble or twist. It packs quite a bit more power than my Extreme Tour, 80% balls can be 50% balls with the PD, saving energy. Control is as expected – not pinpoint, sure, but more than sufficient for my game on clay courts. Touch is very good, but I can not say how much of that is due to the frame or the strings, as I've never played Hyper G before. Anyway, PP nailed it – HG 1.25 is an excellent fit for the new PD.

Woofer grommets – always a hot topic if not a bit overblown IMO on these boards – never bothered me much, to be honest. So the new one does not have woofers and that's ok, I guess. The response of the new PD is more traditional, yes, resulting in maybe a few less fliers, but I need more time with it to really gauge it.

The sweetspot is generous. Whats really interesting is that even on balls outside the sweetspot, like say a mistimed overhead I hit way high in the stringbed, there is basically zero bad vibration in the frame. It's really very well muted in this regard. Serves are not on the level of my Extreme Tour just yet, but that's to be expected on the first few outings. Nevertheless I can see great potential, especially for slice serves. Kickers worked well right away and flat serves clicked towards the end of the first session. Very pleased with that.

To sum it up I think both the Extreme Tour and this new PD will stay in my bag in the foreseeable future. The ET is just so versatile while the PD is just so much fun and easy to play with. Thing is legit.

Great write up. So happy you're grooving with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 808

Power Player

Bionic Poster
Tour sniper is pretty killer in the new pure drive too. I strung it up at 50. Next time will take it up to about 53. The one area that’s bothering me is coming in on short balls and trying to bury the ball. I’ve had a few fly and felt like wtf was that. Pure drivish thing to have happen. But I think I bit higher tension and a little more focus from my dumb arse will bring that in.

surprisingly, I can switch between this and the clash 98 without a lot of trouble. I just think I need a little more tension in the pure drive ( at least with tour sniper ). It’s reallly a super frame.

I got 2 packs of that Sniper coming. Its going in the Ezone next. Love that string. Seems like a perfect fit for tweeners.
 

tim-ay

Legend
it really is a great playing string. I’ve been thinking about trying alpha again also. I tried it head to head against tour sniper before I bought a reel, but not sure I gave it a fair shake in the right type of frame.

would be fun to try it in the pure drive also.
 

danbrenner

Legend
Played a few sets today. One of them with my new pure strike. It hits such a linear ball. Great for closed pattern players. Not for me. I did t take up too many games before going back to my Aeros. Try here’s something about being able to crack a ball with several inches of net clearance that is so addictive. Confidence inspiring.
 

808

Professional
I got 2 packs of that Sniper coming. Its going in the Ezone next. Love that string. Seems like a perfect fit for tweeners.
it really is a great playing string. I’ve been thinking about trying alpha again also. I tried it head to head against tour sniper before I bought a reel, but not sure I gave it a fair shake in the right type of frame.

would be fun to try it in the pure drive also.
I admit that I do not pay as much attention to strings as I probably should. My go-to string is plain old Alu Rough and Hyper G is the first new string I've tried in more than a year.

How would you guys compare Tour Sniper to, say, Alu Rough or Tour Bite?
 

danbrenner

Legend
Beat my opponent handily. In straights. He was using a 95 pro staff. I was thinking to myself. “Dude. You can’t bring a knife to a gun fight”
 

Power Player

Bionic Poster
I admit that I do not pay as much attention to strings as I probably should. My go-to string is plain old Alu Rough and Hyper G is the first new string I've tried in more than a year.

How would you guys compare Tour Sniper to, say, Alu Rough or Tour Bite?

its more comfortable. Holds tension a lot longer. A little less crisp but still has that crispiness i need. Spin levels are high. Not as high as hyper g but pretty close. Lasts forever. Like you can play it until it breaks if you want. Very good control string.
 

808

Professional
its more comfortable. Holds tension a lot longer. A little less crisp but still has that crispiness i need. Spin levels are high. Not as high as hyper g but pretty close. Lasts forever. Like you can play it until it breaks if you want. Very good control string.
Awesome, thanks!
 
Top