Diary of a Racketaholic

topspn

Legend
Yeah, it didn't make sense. I think it's strung at a much higher tension than I requested. I'm going to have to cut them out and try again.
I have hit with the racquet a few times as one of my friends plays it. No hint of harshness for me and it he strings it @51lbs with ultra cable. He also has it weighed up to 348g
 

JGads

G.O.A.T.
Snuck in a lunch hour hit with the v7 today. Without the distraction of all the other frames, I got to enjoy this one a whole heck of a lot. Similarly to the EZ, It's hard to identify a significant weakness with this frame.

There's not much that we don't already know about this frame so I won't bother blabbering on. But I'm on the hunt for a second one.

Just a trusty, flexy beauty. Really just the right amount of control to spicypop ratio. A wee bit like an Ultra Tour with jalapeños.

@BallBasher247 the CX 200 were pretty much universally panned here. Personally, I wouldn’t waste my time with it after some of the most reliable posters here couldn’t jive with it. You may find differently....

Oh no. I'm running far, far away.
 
I initially did 2 grams each at 3 and 9 but I felt the serve was still lacking. I then added 1-2 grams to 12 and it felt a bit sluggish. I ripped everything off and tried the 10 and 2 set up I currently have and it felt much better. There's probably better set ups but this felt good enough for now.

I have the GT Prestige Pro. I'm going to place a lot of the blame on the strings for now as everyone else says otherwise about this racquet. I had a similar experience with the UT when I first got it - not in terms of stiffness or TE but I wasn't getting the feel and pocketing everyone was raving about. I switched strings and it was a night and day difference.

I'm a 4 1/2 grip generally. Main ones in my bag at the moment are the UT and v7 Blade but I have too many others to list - Gravity Pro, PT2.0, UP 16/19, BP 16/19, Dunlop CX200 tour 16/19, Pro Staff RF97, GTPP, and probably a few I'm forgetting.
Will definitely try lead at 10 and 2 if I get one.

Oh, so not the 360+ PP. That's good then. Kinda all over the place here but I might try it. Midsize rackets (85-95) have higher string bed stiffness than a 98 or 100 so you've gotta string lower to not make it boardy. On a PP or CX200 Tour I wouldn't advise stringing above 48lb if you're a poly user, or using a super stiff string like 4G or Tour Bite.

That's quite the collection of rackets; betting the BP and UP 16x19 are some of the standouts among those. I see why the CX200 Tour isn't doing much for you lol....if only those UP's weren't $250 :cautious:
@BallBasher247 the CX 200 were pretty much universally panned here. Personally, I wouldn’t waste my time with it after some of the most reliable posters here couldn’t jive with it. You may find differently....
Part of me feels that way to be honest. It's just that even though my 2019 CX200 Tour 16x19 is hurting my elbow, with its current lead setup it's probably the most dialed in overall my game has been with a racket, and the 2021 seems to be basically the same racket, just a little softer/better dampened. The only rackets I can remember feeling that way with have been the Wilson Ultra Tour, the Yonex VC Duel G 97, and the 2021 Radical Pro so far, but that speaks more to the fact that I probably need to try more rackets.
 

Vicious49

Legend
. The only rackets I can remember feeling that way with have been the Wilson Ultra Tour, the Yonex VC Duel G 97, and the 2021 Radical Pro so far, but that speaks more to the fact that I probably need to try more rackets.

I would add the UP, v7 Blade and PT2.0 to that list. Also the Yonex 97 Pro HD.
 

McGradey

Hall of Fame
First impressions with the Prince Synergy DB 26 reissue

Based on some serving practice (I did this side by side with my 2015 Blade for comparison), and an hour and a bit of singles.
So no doubt more thoughts to come once I put a few more hours on it:

Specs
  • Mine came in at 346g strung (with 17g Tour Bite), exactly the same as Tennis Warehouse listed spec. About 354g all up with overgrip & dampener. A little heavier than I'm aiming for these days, but hey it swings easy enough
  • This is sold as a 97", but overlaying it with my Prince Classic Graphite 100", the racquet head is basically exactly the same size and shape, they overlap almost perfectly. Any difference in size would surely not be noticeable in play.
In play:
  • Power: this frame offers plenty of easy power. Depth comes effortlessly, and on my 2HBH I was having to add more spin or slow down the flatter swing to keep my shots within the lines.
  • Control: good control, not sniper-like like a Head Pro Tour 2.0 or a 6.1 95, but not unpredictable at all. String pattern is not super open despite it being a 16x18. Directional control was good, depth control not as easy as with my 18x20 Blade. I needed to consider the extra power when hitting a DTL shot
  • Spin is good but not crazy. Launch angle is higher than the Blade 18x20. Angled crosscourt shots hit from inside the baseline were a delight
  • Serves, this was where I most easily identified the increased power over my Blade. Easy power on the flat serve, and I found similar accuracy to the Blade on this shot. My kick serve was also clearing the net more easily, landing deeper, and jumping higher than with my Blade. I really appreciated the increased launch angle here.
  • Returns: I was having a lot of fun on the return, standing closer in and taking them on the rise. The rounder head shape and big sweet spot made it easy to redirect first serve returns or take a big rip at second serves
  • Sweet spot: generous. I was finding the sweet spot easily on all strokes. This thing is listed as 97", but as above, I think it's closer to 100"
  • Slice: nasty. I only hit a couple but they stayed low and were fizzing through the court
  • Volleys: Again, I only hit a couple and the combo of higher launch angle and power meant my targeting was off. Will take an adjustment
  • Feel: lots of feel, not harsh but not muted
Comparing to other frames
  • Compared to a Blade 18x20 (2015), this has quite a bit more power, a bit less control, and the launch angle is higher. Manoeuvrability feels similar. Will take more play to really figure this out.
  • I wondered if this would be like a 90s Pure Aero. I was wrong, but it is reminiscent of another Babolat in many ways: the Pure Strike 16x19 (P17). I absolutely loved that racquet, but sold it due to elbow issues. The Prince has a smoother feel while offering a similar addictive mixture of power, spin and control to the Pure Strike. With the rounder head and higher weight, the Synergy is not as whippy as a modern Babolat and doesn't quite offer that trademark crazy spin, but it's similar
  • It's a very solid all round frame with power and spin on tap, so it's easy enough to play with and use today, unlike other stalwarts of its era that are too demanding (for most of us), like the Pro Tour 2.0 or 6.1 95

Update:

Played a couple of hours of doubles last night with old Synergy.

Couple of notes:
  1. Great doubles racquet. Headlight balance makes it nice and fast around the net, and it’s super solid thanks to the mass.
  2. Slice is godly. Almost as good as the 6.1 which is the best slicing frame I’ve ever hit with.
  3. As the vibration frequency stat shows on TW (151hz), this thing can be a touch pingy outside the sweetspot when compared with a low-vibe, padded thumper like a V7 Blade. It’s comfortable, but not one for fans of super flexy racquets.
  4. Caveat to the above being I am also playing it with one of the stiffest strings out there, and while I’m loving the spin and feel, something a little softer would no doubt make for a much plusher ride.
And here’s the racquet overlaid with the PCG 100 and a Blade 98 for anyone who’s interested to see what I meant about the head size and shape.

Not the most scientific test but I figured round here we’re holics, not lab rats.


Really is an awesome frame, glad I picked this up and can see why they chose to reissue it.
 
Last edited:

Power Player

Bionic Poster

!!! :D
Its coming down to Synergy Vs PA19 with the v7Blade waiting in the wings just in case. The Blade Pros will remain as well - too good for me to sell.

My history and win % with the PA/APD has always been rather good, it's just the stiffness of them that usually caused me to switch.
 

topspn

Legend
!!! :D
Its coming down to Synergy Vs PA19 with the v7Blade waiting in the wings just in case. The Blade Pros will remain as well - too good for me to sell.

My history and win % with the PA/APD has always been rather good, it's just the stiffness of them that usually caused me to switch.
Ugh, i tried all tweeners but avoided the Babs due to of course the stiffness. Word is TW PTs seem to prefer the new PD a bit more
 

tim-ay

Legend
Ugh, i tried all tweeners but avoided the Babs due to of course the stiffness. Word is TW PTs seem to prefer the new PD a bit more
PD+ a bit more!

given spec tolerances ya never know.... and I have a bias... but the plus is softer and is like KABANG. Then KAPOW. Then it recites Nietzsche.
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
!!! :D
Its coming down to Synergy Vs PA19 with the v7Blade waiting in the wings just in case. The Blade Pros will remain as well - too good for me to sell.

My history and win % with the PA/APD has always been rather good, it's just the stiffness of them that usually caused me to switch.
The previous releases of the APDs and PA have all been too stiff for me. This one has been comfortable.
 
I would add the UP, v7 Blade and PT2.0 to that list. Also the Yonex 97 Pro HD.
Having demoed an Ultra Tour for a week, I loved everything about it except that TIGHT 18x20; the 16x19 UP would likely be an instant switch if I could get one under $250. Also tried a PT2.0; really liked the solidness/feel from that one. The string pattern is a little dense for me but at under $200 I might pick one up just to have one. Also tried a VCP97HD briefly; felt like a board but demo was strung @56lbs so I wanna try it strung 8-10lbs lower; should feel way better. I like the launch angle from its open 18x20 tho. Didn't like the v7 Blade 18x20 at all but the 16x19 was alright IMO. Still haven't tried any Angells yet, nor any of the G360+ Prestiges or the VCore 95s, nor the TF40s. Kinda curious about this new Synergy 18x18 but that'll have to wait.
 
Last edited:

snoflewis

Legend
Having demoed an Ultra Tour for a week, I loved everything about it except that TIGHT 18x20; the 16x19 UP would likely be an instant switch if I could get one under $250. Also tried a PT2.0; really liked the solidness feel from that one. The string pattern is a little dense for me but at under $200 I might pick one up just to have one. Also tried a VCP97HD briefly; felt like a board but demo was strung @56lbs so I wanna try it strung 8-10lbs lower; should feel way better. I like the launch angle from its open 18x20 tho. Didn't like the v7 Blade 18x20 at all but the 16x19 was alright IMO. Still haven't tried any Angells yet, nor any of the G360+ Prestiges or the VCore 95s, nor the TF40s. Kinda curious about this new Synergy 18x18 but that'll have to wait.

might want to do a bit of searching. There's a 25% coupon wilson code floating around
 

Power Player

Bionic Poster
Ugh, i tried all tweeners but avoided the Babs due to of course the stiffness. Word is TW PTs seem to prefer the new PD a bit more
Honestly if you arent playing usta or tournaments right now, id stay with the BP. The babs are for when i go into “win now” mode. And i can pull that off with blade style frames as well, just figuring out what is the best fit for me long term.

The PA standard has a real low vibration and enough folks here vouch for its comfort so i should be good. But you never know - so the blade v7s remain.

also my GF was really bummed i sold the pa+ because she thought it was the best looking racquet i had. So that has to count for something.
 

topspn

Legend
Honestly if you arent playing usta or tournaments right now, id stay with the BP. The babs are for when i go into “win now” mode. And i can pull that off with blade style frames as well, just figuring out what is the best fit for me long term.

The PA standard has a real low vibration and enough folks here vouch for its comfort so i should be good. But you never know - so the blade v7s remain.

also my GF was really bummed i sold the pa+ because she thought it was the best looking racquet i had. So that has to count for something.
lol not criticizing at all, i was also looking for what benefits me the most results wise trying tweeners was just afraid of bab stifness. I did really like the 2013 APD and gave me results. Just couldn't find 3 matched in decent shape anymore so gave up. The vibration frequency is actually good so hopefully enough control can be had as well.
 

Power Player

Bionic Poster
lol not criticizing at all, i was also looking for what benefits me the most results wise trying tweeners was just afraid of bab stifness. I did really like the 2013 APD and gave me results. Just couldn't find 3 matched in decent shape anymore so gave up. The vibration frequency is actually good so hopefully enough control can be had as well.

I didn't think you were criticizing, I just thought you may be feeling some Holic GAS from the way I read your post, so I figured I'd help douse that flame a little and save you some $$.
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
lol not criticizing at all, i was also looking for what benefits me the most results wise trying tweeners was just afraid of bab stifness. I did really like the 2013 APD and gave me results. Just couldn't find 3 matched in decent shape anymore so gave up. The vibration frequency is actually good so hopefully enough control can be had as well.
I know the 2013 APD has a really devout following. I definitely appreciated its many positive qualities, but I find the PA19 to work better for me in every way possible. While they are have the same RA, the PA19 seems to feel a lot more comfortable to me. My shoulder and wrist are always quick to squawk if a racquet is too stiff or harsh and so far it hasn’t with the PA19.
 

tim-ay

Legend
Honestly if you arent playing usta or tournaments right now, id stay with the BP. The babs are for when i go into “win now” mode. And i can pull that off with blade style frames as well, just figuring out what is the best fit for me long term.

The PA standard has a real low vibration and enough folks here vouch for its comfort so i should be good. But you never know - so the blade v7s remain.

also my GF was really bummed i sold the pa+ because she thought it was the best looking racquet i had. So that has to count for something.
As you said ages ago, the energy savings is real though. I did not realize how significant it was until we hit 84 the other day. This is going to be a real dilemma as things heat up. I have a few matches later this week , one of the days will be 88. I may be PD+Ing it. That will be a shock to the system.
 

topspn

Legend
I didn't think you were criticizing, I just thought you may be feeling some Holic GAS from the way I read your post, so I figured I'd help douse that flame a little and save you some $$.
I just got an additional BP ;) but also have 2 blade V6 reissue that also play really well. I was actually thinking of checking out a tweener but something made down under
 

Vicious49

Legend
Ugh, i tried all tweeners but avoided the Babs due to of course the stiffness. Word is TW PTs seem to prefer the new PD a bit more

Ive avoided Babolat for the same reason. Scared of the stiffness and it’s one less brand for me to worry about demoing.
 

topspn

Legend
I know the 2013 APD has a really devout following. I definitely appreciated its many positive qualities, but I find the PA19 to work better for me in every way possible. While they are have the same RA, the PA19 seems to feel a lot more comfortable to me. My shoulder and wrist are always quick to squawk if a racquet is too stiff or harsh and so far it hasn’t with the PA19.
I trust what you say on comfort but can't really say anything about PA other then looking at it, it was a more open pattern then the 2013 APD which was a warning for me. Still that impression could easily be wrong
 

ryushen21

Legend
Yeah, I don't think that a 95 sq in 18x20 is the best choice for someone who primarily stays at the baseline, generally. I am aware that you seem to gravitate more towards 18 main rackets, but I think the 16x19 works better in the CX200 Tour than the 18x20; it's still a dense 16x19 but it's just a touch more forgiving and spin-friendly. I know they're anemic in stock form but how was the feel and comfort of your 18x20?

I see what you're getting at (or at least I think I do); there's lots of great rackets nowadays that don't have to be heavily customized to get adequate power, stability and plow from them. It would have been great if Dunlop just gave both rackets a leather grip and made them both 320 grams unstrung with a 325-335 strung SW so that they're usable in stock form, and still can be weighted up to 350-370g battle axes if desired, especially since these are sold as "Tour" rackets with no distinction that they're "pro stock" or "platform frames" or anything. If I had my choice, I'd either get a couple of Ultra Pro 16x19s or I'd have a couple of TC95s or Dahcor AK97s customized to my specs but I can't afford to spend ~$300 per racket once strings are factored in. I still have many more regular retail rackets to try though; been eyeing the VCore 95s lately and I've never tried one so I'm really curious. What are some of the rackets that you've really liked over the past year or so, preferably 16 mains if you've tried any?
I'd disagree on the first part. The v7 18x20 is baseline beast that destroys from all parts of the court. It is true that I have favored 18x20 frames in the past but recently have switched over to the world of 16x19. The comfort of the CX200 18x20 is fine, but there is very little feel. Even with a crisper poly, it doesn't liven up or provide a better response. It could have been a great frame but just ultimately fell very short for me.

In terms of 16x19s that I've tried, I really enjoyed the Extreme Tour, obviously the EZ 100, and the PA 19 (I really wish I'd gotten to string that up with my preferred string and had more time with it). Supposedly the new VCore line is great. As a reformed racquet classicist, I don't see why you would limit yourself to the 95. Look at the 98 and the 100, you won't be sorry.

@BallBasher247 the CX 200 were pretty much universally panned here. Personally, I wouldn’t waste my time with it after some of the most reliable posters here couldn’t jive with it. You may find differently....
You speak truth. The wise will heed your word.

Grabbed a Pure Aero 19 since I dont know when the Synergy will actually ship and I want to get grooving with something. Went with the standard length version. May try full Black Knight 1.28 on it right away and see how that goes.
I sense greatness in this. Also, a delightedly evil smirk from @mad dog1

Just a trusty, flexy beauty. Really just the right amount of control to spicypop ratio. A wee bit like an Ultra Tour with jalapeños.
Indeed, I hit more with it this afternoon and it keeps getting better. Plus, @Power Player was right that S7T is practically perfect in this frame.

Side note, one of my players today thought that they got me with a nicely angled cross-court forehand. They closed in the cover the down-the-line shot and I scooped the ball up from down low for a cross-court winnder a la Kyrgios. The Blade swings differently than the EZ but there is something wonderfully familiar about it.
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
I trust what you say on comfort but can't really say anything about PA other then looking at it, it was a more open pattern then the 2013 APD which a was warning for me. Still that impression could easily be wrong
I thought the same coming from the UT and PPs. No way will this stiff, open patterned cannon work for me at all. Wasn’t the case at all. The racquet review I found to be most accurate was the one by Alex and Simon from TopTennisTraining. I believe the PA19 is Alex’s main stick.
 

topspn

Legend
I thought the same coming from the UT and PPs. No way will this stiff, open patterned cannon work for me at all. Wasn’t the case at all. The racquet review I found to be most accurate was the one by Alex and Simon from TopTennisTraining. I believe the PA19 is Alex’s main stick.
Yep, he did switch to it a while back and he actually does drive the ball more. I may have to demo and check out for myself
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
Grabbed a Pure Aero 19 since I dont know when the Synergy will actually ship and I want to get grooving with something. Went with the standard length version. May try full Black Knight 1.28 on it right away and see how that goes.
Btw, BK may not feel too stiff but it’s sneaky firm. Highly recommend crossing it with a softer cross like GW or RS Lyon or something similar. One of my fave setups in the PA has become cyclone 1.25/rs lyon 1.25 or cyclone 1.25/yptp 1.30. I’ve found both to be very comfortable and offer good performance and decent string life.
 

JGads

G.O.A.T.
Indeed, I hit more with it this afternoon and it keeps getting better. Plus, @Power Player was right that S7T is practically perfect in this frame.

Side note, one of my players today thought that they got me with a nicely angled cross-court forehand. They closed in the cover the down-the-line shot and I scooped the ball up from down low for a cross-court winnder a la Kyrgios. The Blade swings differently than the EZ but there is something wonderfully familiar about it.

You've never hit with Tour Bite in the v7 have you? My only question is if s7t could outdo the TB, but I absolutely love TB in the right frame and this seems like a match made in heaven for me. That added spin/bite does even spicier things when you combine it with the flex and pocketing of this stick.
 

Power Player

Bionic Poster
As you said ages ago, the energy savings is real though. I did not realize how significant it was until we hit 84 the other day. This is going to be a real dilemma as things heat up. I have a few matches later this week , one of the days will be 88. I may be PD+Ing it. That will be a shock to the system.

Yeah if I was in FL, I don't think I would have purchased the BP's because I know what's coming in 2 months lol. Here, as you know, its easier to play longer. I am now used to the altitude and how the ball responds and its basically going to boil down to what I feel most confident with out there. I really have enjoyed the PD a lot so far. Its just crazy to hear that I hit with even more sting using a frame that's probably 325ish SW and weighs 320 strung, but it's tough to deny the results.
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
Yep, he did switch to it a while back and he actually does drive the ball more. I may have to demo and check out for myself
You should. I’m telling you, it’s just as easy for me to hit the ball with a higher trajectory with lots of topspin or step in and flatten my stroke and drive the ball. Just a phenomenal stick.
 

Power Player

Bionic Poster
Btw, BK may not feel too stiff but it’s sneaky firm. Highly recommend crossing it with a softer cross like GW or RS Lyon or something similar. One of my fave setups in the PA has become cyclone 1.25/rs lyon 1.25 or cyclone 1.25/yptp 1.30. I’ve found both to be very comfortable and offer good performance and decent string life.

Noted. Maybe I will cross it with RS if that's the case. Plus I have the trusty Tour Sniper which feels awesome in the PD.

I think I will start with a full bed of Tour Sniper and see how long it lasts. It is a pretty thick string for a 1.25
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
You've never hit with Tour Bite in the v7 have you? My only question is if s7t could outdo the TB, but I absolutely love TB in the right frame and this seems like a match made in heaven for me. That added spin/bite does even spicier things when you combine it with the flex and pocketing of this stick.
S7T lasts much longer than TB. It has better notch resistance and better tension stability.
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
Noted. Maybe I will cross it with RS if that's the case. Plus I have the trusty Tour Sniper which feels awesome in the PD.

I think I will start with a full bed of Tour Sniper and see how long it lasts. It is a pretty thick string for a 1.25
BK is comfortable during the first ~5 hours. Once it’s about 1/3 notched, it’s dead for all intents and purposes and should be cut out IME. When I kept it in for longer, my wrist started aching. I’ve switched to cyclone 1.25/yptp 1.30 which remains playable the longest and so far after 8 hours, it’s still playable and comfortable. If you do go BK, keep track of the amount of time on the string bed and I recommend cutting it out as soon as it starts to feel dead.
 

ryushen21

Legend
You've never hit with Tour Bite in the v7 have you? My only question is if s7t could outdo the TB, but I absolutely love TB in the right frame and this seems like a match made in heaven for me. That added spin/bite does even spicier things when you combine it with the flex and pocketing of this stick.
Not yet, but it is the next string that I'll be trying in the v7. Although, the S7T is so damn good that I could see skipping on the TB.
 

JGads

G.O.A.T.
S7T lasts much longer than TB. It has better notch resistance and better tension stability.

Thing that steers me away from s7t is that my elbow chirped when I put it into the Grandpa Blade, but I don't know for 100 percent certainty if it was the string or something else at that time. Total comfort and no chirping ever with TB in the v7, and this is an aged bed; probably has about 7-8 or so hours on it by now and feels great.
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
Thing that steers me away from s7t is that my elbow chirped when I put it into the Grandpa Blade, but I don't know for 100 percent certainty if it was the string or something else at that time. Total comfort and no chirping ever with TB in the v7, and this is an aged bed; probably has about 7-8 or so hours on it by now and feels great.
Cross it with a softer string like rs lyon or something similar. I can also see dropping tension by 2-4# with S7T. I have a reel of the stuff so I’ll eventually get around to trying it in more racquets.
 

Power Player

Bionic Poster
I thought the same coming from the UT and PPs. No way will this stiff, open patterned cannon work for me at all. Wasn’t the case at all. The racquet review I found to be most accurate was the one by Alex and Simon from TopTennisTraining. I believe the PA19 is Alex’s main stick.

That is a great review. Just interesting since I finish points at net when I can, serve with a lot of slice and top and like to drive through the ball sometimes, not just always brush. And those are all the things they said it is good at.

When I did use the +, the guy I hit with was very good and told me the shots were heaviest with it. I just was going back and forth between XL and standard and demoing the UP. I hope I can get some decent string life out of it (5-6 ish)hours with the TSniper.
 

Vicious49

Legend
You can add Dunlop to your list so 2 less brands now. ;)

im sure Dunlop makes something that’s nice. In all honesty if the CX200 didn’t have such a sweet paint job I would have moved on from it long ago. It’s just so pretty that I’m hoping I find something there.
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
im sure Dunlop makes something that’s nice. In all honesty if the CX200 didn’t have such a sweet paint job I would have moved on from it long ago. It’s just so pretty that I’m hoping I find something there.
Corrected for you...Made...
 
Last edited:
I'd disagree on the first part. The v7 18x20 is baseline beast that destroys from all parts of the court. It is true that I have favored 18x20 frames in the past but recently have switched over to the world of 16x19. The comfort of the CX200 18x20 is fine, but there is very little feel. Even with a crisper poly, it doesn't liven up or provide a better response. It could have been a great frame but just ultimately fell very short for me.

In terms of 16x19s that I've tried, I really enjoyed the Extreme Tour, obviously the EZ 100, and the PA 19 (I really wish I'd gotten to string that up with my preferred string and had more time with it). Supposedly the new VCore line is great. As a reformed racquet classicist, I don't see why you would limit yourself to the 95. Look at the 98 and the 100, you won't be sorry.


You speak truth. The wise will heed your word.


I sense greatness in this. Also, a delightedly evil smirk from @mad dog1
Yeah, the Blade 18x20 is insane from the baseline; that's a 98 though. Would much rather have that than a 95 with 18x20 for strictly baseline tennis. Never gelled with the countervail or v7 18x20 Blades but the 2015 v5 was a great frame IMO.

That's all I needed to know about the 2021 CX's then. No feel=no go for me.

I've heard great things about the ET but have yet to try one. I wonder how that would feel with a leather grip and some weight in the hoop...

Totally agree on the PA19, that racket is really fun to hit with. FH goes from typical semi-western lefty stroke to buggy whip with grunt with that one lol.

You're right about the VC98, people seem to like that one so I'll probably try it out alongside the 95. String pattern looks dense which is good. The 100 is a no-go; would probably be fun to try but it would be like a softer PA; fun to blast winners and aces with but too much power for my liking.
 

Vicious49

Legend
I wouldn’t say the CX200 has no feel. To me it’s like driving a Lexus. It has a very soft ride but you dont feel connected to the road. Whereas the UT/UP is like driving an Acura. its still a nice ride but it’s a more fun ride as you can feel the turns, etc. With the UT you know the second it comes off your racquet where the ball is going to land. The CX200 is like - wow, that was a nice soft hit and you know the general area where it will land but not pinpoint accuracy like the UT. Not the best analogy but it’s the best I could come up with,
 
Top