Why is this even a question?Hmm.
Yeah pretty much spot on...Excellent post.Djokovic has been better than Federer at every age. Djokovic's standard of play when he is 40 and retired would embarrass the current Federer.
There is the argument flowing that because the competition is so weak right now Djokovic level isn't relevant to win slams. I'm now giving a reason for fellow posters to measure Nole level by using another ATG to compare.Why is this even a question?
Federer was done at 29, aside from '17 he's never been the best in the world since then. Djoks currently holds 3 slams + should be 4Djokovic has been better than Federer at every age. Djokovic's standard of play when he is 40 and retired would embarrass the current Federer.
2015 Fed had an amazing Summer/Fall like you said. Djokovic will have to play at a high levelWe’re essentially comparing 2015 Fed to 2021 Djokovic, really. As it stands, it’s not close at all. Check out the big tournaments:
AO: Novak, Fed lost to Seppi.
IW: 2021 IW delayed so no verdict yet. Fed did play well at IW 2015 so Novak would need to put in a good performance.
Miami: pointless comparison since both of them skipped it
Monte-Carlo: Fed by a hair but they were both bad
Madrid: I guess Fed wins by default considering he played it while Djokovic skipped it but there’s not much in it considering he lost in the opening round
Rome: Fed was better pre-final, Novak was better in the final.
French Open: Novak clearly better, Fed was uninspiring throughout
See, based on the Slams so far, it’s clearly Djokovic. I wanna see how Djokovic holds up, though, because Fed massively improved in the second half of the season.
If the comparison is at 33, Fed probably wins.
did u watch 2015? Fed was legit that yearFederer was done at 29, aside from '17 he's never been the best in the world since then. Djoks currently holds 3 slams + should be 4
Or 2012. Fed was very solid in the back half of 2014 too.Di
did u watch 2015? Fed was legit that year
Who cares what some think. Djok is THE GOAT and that's EOD. Let them weep.There is the argument flowing that because the competition is so weak right now Djokovic level isn't relevant to win slams. I'm now giving a reason for fellow posters to measure Nole level by using another ATG to compare.
How so? Djoko wins RG and AO by a substantial margin. UO is the DQ and Fed lost to Cilic in straights and went 5 with La Monf so not exactly great. Djokovic didn't get his chance at W so unfair to assume 14 W Fed automatically better. Djokovic was also damn good outside the slams winning ATP Cup, Dubai, Cinci, and Rome.We’re essentially comparing 2015 Fed to 2021 Djokovic, really. As it stands, it’s not close at all. Check out the big tournaments:
AO: Novak, Fed lost to Seppi.
IW: 2021 IW delayed so no verdict yet. Fed did play well at IW 2015 so Novak would need to put in a good performance.
Miami: pointless comparison since both of them skipped it
Monte-Carlo: Fed by a hair but they were both bad
Madrid: I guess Fed wins by default considering he played it while Djokovic skipped it but there’s not much in it considering he lost in the opening round
Rome: Fed was better pre-final, Novak was better in the final.
French Open: Novak clearly better, Fed was uninspiring throughout
See, based on the Slams so far, it’s clearly Djokovic. I wanna see how Djokovic holds up, though, because Fed massively improved in the second half of the season.
If the comparison is at 33, Fed probably wins.
It's a tough comparison but I think Fed ultimately impressed me more throughout the year. Djokovic wasn't impressive at all to me after the tour resumed (he didn't play particularly well at Cincy and the Rome draw made him look way better than he was; Fed wasn't perfect in Cincy 2014 but I felt he was better) and it felt like he was sleepwalking to whatever big tournament he came by (save for the freak DQ and Nadal on clay). Before the lockdowns, though, Djokovic looked pretty good.How so? Djoko wins RG and AO by a substantial margin. UO is the DQ and Fed lost to Cilic in straights and went 5 with La Monf so not exactly great. Djokovic didn't get his chance at W so unfair to assume 14 W Fed automatically better. Djokovic was also damn good outside the slams winning ATP Cup, Dubai, Cinci, and Rome.
Yeah, i think it could be very interesting. I was not in this forum at the time but i think Fed was the favorite by posters of this forum in the 2015 finals.Djokovic of today vs Federer of 2015 would be a fun matchup maybe Federer favourite at Wimbledon or Us open as well
Maybe on grass but hardly anywhere elseTough to say because at age 33-35 Ol’ Rog was going up against Prime/Peakovic. I’m sure Prime/Peakerer would make Oldovic look just as helpless.
Federer fans couldn’t imagine Djokovic or Nadal winning slams after turning 30 either, but we all know how that turns out."Better" and "more successful" aren't the same thing
37y11mo Federer can get double MP on 32yo Djok, can't imagine 32yo Fed doing worse
Federer fans couldn’t imagine Djokovic or Nadal winning slams after turning 30 either, but we all know how that turns out.
It means Fed fans’ imagination is overrated. That’s all.I don't understand how that's related though. Some people were wrong about something and that means that others will be wrong about something else? That's literally only true in the very vaguest way. This is a totally different question.
It means Fed fans’ imagination is overrated. That’s all.
It’s spot on, considering the point being that the things you can or can’t imagine do not make a convincing argument.I guess, but that's not really an answer.
Fed at Djoker's current age was better than Djok is now, but he literally had both of them at ages 27/28 while Djok has no real threats outside of crippled Fred and Rafa. So he wasn't as successful and the fact that he did win more Slams is a miracle.
It’s spot on, considering the point being that the things you can or can’t imagine do not make a convincing argument.
Appearance wise Djoker certainly looks younger than Fed at the same age. Fed probably had too much Barilla.Fed's 34 is older than Djoker's 34 (heard a lot of it as excuses.)
Who cares what some think. Djok is THE GOAT and that's EOD. Let them weep.
Tough to say because at age 33-35 Ol’ Rog was going up against Prime/Peakovic. I’m sure Prime/Peakerer would make Oldovic look just as helpless.
Reported.Hmm.
Read the press. No one cares about you and your opinion.Not until 21 slams he isn't.