Wimbledon forced to defend “dangerous” courts

Visionary

Hall of Fame
The surface has been approved by authorities as mentioned in the article. So wimbledon has no liabilities. If players find it not suitable for their game, they can skip the tournament rather than play with their HC/Clay technique. Your point about insurance and the topic of playing on ice is irrelevant.
What is "irrelevant" to the topic is your ignorant snub to the notion that those players may have worked extraordinarily hard to prepare for the tournament to see conditions beyond their expectations. Many of those fine pro athletes may not be in the position to just "skip the tournament". Would you not come to your office for the day, if you knew the floor was wet? Would you not come to work, if that meant you would not make money for that day?

Now, I believe that just about every pro tennis player has an insurance policy as much as the Wimbledon has one for itself. The authorities that approved Wimbledon's lab grass must have one fine carefully drafted insurance policy as well. Who is liable for the embarrassingly slippery grass conditions should not be decided by us.
 

RF-18

Talk Tennis Guru
Fix it Wimbledon, or allow players to wear these. This seems like the only option for the moment considering what they've done.

66411.jpg
 

blablavla

G.O.A.T.
""The slipping around we see now was unheard of in previous generations of tennis players accustomed to grass.""

Yes, older generations were more used to playing on grass, and there were far more grass courts and events to practice on. But take a look at old videos of them. They were far slower moving and less agile and athletic than today's players. It's a different game now with better equipment and far greater skills. The players have changed. The grass? Some, but not that much.

right, let's blame the grass for ATP and ITF closing both eyes to:
- introduction of poly strings
- rackets with ever bigger head size
- rackets with ever increase stiffness
 

Forehanderer

Professional
What is "irrelevant" to the topic is your ignorant snub to the notion that those players may have worked extraordinarily hard to prepare for the tournament to see conditions beyond their expectations. Many of those fine pro athletes may not be in the position to just "skip the tournament". Would you not come to your office for the day, if you knew the floor was wet? Would you not come to work, if that meant you would not make money for that day?

Now, I believe that just about every pro tennis player has an insurance policy as much as the Wimbledon has one for itself. The authorities that approved Wimbledon's lab grass must have one fine carefully drafted insurance policy as well. Who is liable for the embarrassingly slippery grass conditions should not be decided by us.
Wet grass is slippery :eek:. Oh my we should put a disclaimer on the big screen that it is slippery out there. Gimme a break. This is how it was and it will continue to be. Deal with it. Even Djokovic and Federer didn't blame Wimbledon on this issue. I'm more likely to take tennis related information from them than arm chair experts like you. As usual, you are resorting to different tangents. First it was playing on ice and now work place is wet. Stick to tennis :)
 

Visionary

Hall of Fame
Wet grass is slippery :eek:. Oh my we should put a disclaimer on the big screen that it is slippery out there. Gimme a break.
Unintelligent! Here is your break. Wet grass is wet, as you say, but it dries in a timely fashion as the water gets absorbed. On the other hand, some lab grass does not dry well for it is genetically modified not to accept as much water as some other (more natural) grass does. Having GM grass that does not need regular watering is very convenient but also risky as this kind of grass may not only keep the natural moisture or drizzle on itself, it may differ in its consistency. Ignoring those facts about such GM grass is despicable, given that we have our great heroes and the finnest sport on the planet Earth affected to a dangerous extent.
 

SonnyT

Legend
Players have always slipped at Wimbledon, nothing new. The only thing new is that, now they can play when the air is full of moisture, because of the roofs.

They are adults, who know full well of the risks involved, and are handsomely compensated. If the risks are too great for them, then don't play. Many others are only too willing to replace them, and assume the risks.

Athletes playing numerous other sports on grass fields also assume the same risks, even in pouring rain. The amateurs among them are not even paid a penny. Jesus, need everyone be treated like babies?
 

blablavla

G.O.A.T.
Unintelligent! Here is your break. Wet grass is wet, as you say, but it dries in a timely fashion as the water gets absorbed. On the other hand, some lab grass does not dry well for it is genetically modified not to accept as much water as some other (more natural) grass does. Having GM grass that does not need regular watering is very convenient but also risky as this kind of grass may not only keep the natural moisture or drizzle on itself, it may differ in its consistency. Ignoring those facts about such GM grass is despicable, given that we have our great heroes and the finnest sport on the planet Earth affected to a dangerous extent.

I would like to make a revolutionary statement:
water is wet
 

Forehanderer

Professional
Unintelligent! Here is your break. Wet grass is wet, as you say, but it dries in a timely fashion as the water gets absorbed. On the other hand, some lab grass does not dry well for it is genetically modified not to accept as much water as some other (more natural) grass does. Having GM grass that does not need regular watering is very convenient but also risky as this kind of grass may not only keep the natural moisture or drizzle on itself, it may differ in its consistency. Ignoring those facts about such GM grass is despicable, given that we have our great heroes and the finnest sport on the planet Earth affected to a dangerous extent.
Hey intelligent one, check your spelling first. Rest of your post is just mind numbing nonsense. Fail (n)
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
I haven't played since covid. And not only do I play tennis, but I paid for all my own tennis lessons. I didn't have parents funding me.

Bart playing tennis?
with so much arguing on this board, I'd expect that Bart doesn't play ANY tennis in real life
 

blablavla

G.O.A.T.
I haven't played since covid. And not only do I play tennis, but I paid for all my own tennis lessons. I didn't have parents funding me.

congrats Bart!
now, would you mind telling to all the interested members of this forum how much experience with playing tennis on grass do you have?
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
And if there is moisture in the air, then it will also fall onto the grass.

The idea of 'voluntary responsibility of risk' is no excuse for irresponsible management.

Players have always slipped at Wimbledon, nothing new. The only thing new is that, now they can play when the air is full of moisture, because of the roofs.

They are adults, who know full well of the risks involved, and are handsomely compensated. If the risks are too great for them, then don't play. Many others are only too willing to replace them, and assume the risks.

Athletes playing numerous other sports on grass fields also assume the same risks, even in pouring rain. The amateurs among them are not even paid a penny. Jesus, need everyone be treated like babies?
 

blablavla

G.O.A.T.
And if there is moisture in the air, then it will also fall onto the grass.

The idea of 'voluntary responsibility of risk' is no excuse for irresponsible management.

should clay courts be banned?
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
Risk minimisation is the name of the game, not risk elimination.

should clay courts be banned?
 

Cupcake

Hall of Fame
The courts should not be as slippery as they are, so they did not make enough allowance for inclement weather.

This is the bottom line - the courts are too slippery for today's elite players.

Tne players are more important than the pretty green grass.
 

Dan Lobb

G.O.A.T.
""The slipping around we see now was unheard of in previous generations of tennis players accustomed to grass.""

Yes, older generations were more used to playing on grass, and there were far more grass courts and events to practice on. But take a look at old videos of them. They were far slower moving and less agile and athletic than today's players. It's a different game now with better equipment and far greater skills. The players have changed. The grass? Some, but not that much.
No, the older generations of players were very athletic, quick as rabbits. Take a look at the footspeed of the great players of the fifties, very quick movers, Gonzales, Sedgman, Hoad, Rosewall, Laver, Gimeno, Olmedo, Segura, they knew how to get around. The Aussies under Hopman practiced sprints and long distance running.
The weight-lifting regimes of Sedgman and Hoad were legendary.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
The players were as small as rabbits but as slow as snails. Their whirring little legs just gave the impression of speed. Grass court tennis required nimbleness but not speed.

No, the older generations of players were very athletic, quick as rabbits. Take a look at the footspeed of the great players of the fifties, very quick movers, Gonzales, Sedgman, Hoad, Rosewall, Laver, Gimeno, Olmedo, Segura, they knew how to get around. The Aussies under Hopman practiced sprints and long distance running.
The weight-lifting regimes of Sedgman and Hoad were legendary.
 

blablavla

G.O.A.T.
The players were as small as rabbits but as slow as snails. Their whirring little legs just gave the impression of speed. Grass court tennis required nimbleness but not speed.

thanks for enlightening us

can I ask you what meds are you on?
or what are you smoking?
I would like to try that stuff as well
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
I've seen many old time matches. Those guys weren't quick. They were nimble, that's all. Newcombe used to win matches with a hangover, not even Krygios can do that.

thanks for enlightening us

can I ask you what meds are you on?
or what are you smoking?
I would like to try that stuff as well
 

blablavla

G.O.A.T.
I've seen many old time matches. Those guys weren't quick. They were nimble, that's all. Newcombe used to win matches with a hangover, not even Krygios can do that.

Safin as well used to win matches with a hangover

Big 3 win matches even prior to stepping on the court
I recall, not that long ago, a Nole with shoulder injury, when he could barely serve, won a few matches at USO
and in 2021, a Nole with a serious injury won AO, so I guess current pro players 'aren't quick. They are nimble, that's all', right?
 
""The slipping around we see now was unheard of in previous generations of tennis players accustomed to grass.""

Yes, older generations were more used to playing on grass, and there were far more grass courts and events to practice on. But take a look at old videos of them. They were far slower moving and less agile and athletic than today's players. It's a different game now with better equipment and far greater skills. The players have changed. The grass? Some, but not that much.
Far greater skills? You must be joking.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
Old-time players had greater touch and were nimble, but the skill set of the modern player is wider than that. Precision with speed is harder to execute when you're grass-surfng.
 

Dan Lobb

G.O.A.T.
Actually, the use of the jumbo size racquet heads in current technology allows less skilled returns of serve and groundstrokes, which creates the long and boring baseline play we see so much of today.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
Someone who listens to German romantic music with their jumbo-sized orchestras has no right to complain about jumbo-sized racquets.
 

Cupcake

Hall of Fame
Ymer just slipped in the backcourt - trainer on the way. Seems serious. Walking but limping... Being assessed...

Happened in the 3rd set, one set each, vs FAA.


And more rain/showers are predicted for the next 5 days....
 

Dan Lobb

G.O.A.T.
This is the bottom line - the courts are too slippery for today's elite players.

Tne players are more important than the pretty green grass.
A great tennis player is incomplete if he cannot play on grass, the surface which was used by the great players of the recent past and distant past.
If today's greats want to be mentioned in the same category as the historic greats, they need to develop some basic tennis skills for tennis surfaces.
 

Dan Lobb

G.O.A.T.
Grass is dangerous time to get rid of it screw tradition.
If today's greats want to ignore tradition, I do not want to hear them or their supporters making any claims about how they rank in historical perspective.
If you ignore tradition, you cannot make any historical comparisons or claims.
 

Cupcake

Hall of Fame
All the words in the world will not make playing on grass for todays elite, exceptionally athletic players any less dangerous.

And now, more rain and showers predicted for the next 5 days. That will really help, lol.

That said, grass at Wimbledon won't change in my life-time. Since the grass wears down so quickly anyway, let people play doubles on the succulent grass for a week or so before the tournament starts. Let them flatten and bruise it a bit. Instead of what they do now - one set of light ladies'doubles.
 

Cupcake

Hall of Fame
A great tennis player is incomplete if he cannot play on grass, the surface which was used by the great players of the recent past and distant past.
If today's greats want to be mentioned in the same category as the historic greats, they need to develop some basic tennis skills for tennis surfaces.

It's all well and good to say players should learn to play on grass. But reality prevents that. Exactly where are today's current pros and up-and-comers supposed to learn to play on grass? And when? And who is going to pay for it? Ivan Lendl had a grass court built at his home so he could win Wimbledon. Didn't work. Nadal has those in Mallorca. And a few others places have local grass courts, and some academies. But for the most part, for the rest of the world, there are fewer and fewer grass courts in existence. It's a dying surface, in more ways than one. We had 6 in our tennis-oriented, wealthy community, but those were bulldozed a couple decades ago. (they were fun, but the upkeep :eek: ). We have at least 7 private tennis clubs in town, some quite hoity-toity, plus several public court enclaves. There is not a single grass court at any of them. Not one.

Where are younger players who don't live in moist areas (where grass can grow in summer) going to practice. And when? The grass court season is about a month long, all the other events are clay or hardcourt. The thought is pretty that grass will still be important in decades to come. But the truth is it's an anachronism.
 

"Did you know that the architecture of your feet is similar to that of your hands? Your feet actually have the ability to grip, bend and reach quite a bit! Or, should we say, had the ability, because wearing shoes all the time causes your feet to lose their ability to support themselves, making them dependent on artificial support."

"Your feet have around 72,000 nerve endings, but they start to die when you wear shoes for too long."

"Your feet are covered with perioreceptors, which communicate with your brain and give it feedback about your body’s position and alignment. Wearing shoes hampers these receptors and restricts the movement of the muscles and joints in your feet and legs as well. "

"...allowing your feet to come in contact with the floor will improve your stability, increase your range of motion..."
 
Last edited:

Dan Lobb

G.O.A.T.
It's all well and good to say players should learn to play on grass. But reality prevents that. Exactly where are today's current pros and up-and-comers supposed to learn to play on grass? And when? And who is going to pay for it? Ivan Lendl had a grass court built at his home so he could win Wimbledon. Didn't work. Nadal has those in Mallorca. And a few others places have local grass courts, and some academies. But for the most part, for the rest of the world, there are fewer and fewer grass courts in existence. It's a dying surface, in more ways than one. We had 6 in our tennis-oriented, wealthy community, but those were bulldozed a couple decades ago. (they were fun, but the upkeep :eek: ). We have at least 7 private tennis clubs in town, some quite hoity-toity, plus several public court enclaves. There is not a single grass court at any of them. Not one.

Where are younger players who don't live in moist areas (where grass can grow in summer) going to practice. And when? The grass court season is about a month long, all the other events are clay or hardcourt. The thought is pretty that grass will still be important in decades to come. But the truth is it's an anachronism.
The use of hard rubber on cement is also a tough surface to endorse, the almost universal leg/knee injuries of the pros attest to that. I would not play on a hard rubber/cement surface.
I recommend doing the right thing, bring back grass. Money is not the only consideration.
 
I recommend doing the right thing, bring back grass. Money is not the only consideration.
HEAR, HEAR! Yup! Baseball, football, soccer, golf are all played on grass! Tennis players and club owners are generally too cheap and shortsighted to support grass courts--it's a shame most players will not experience the joy of playing barefoot on grass courts.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
The market has spoken. The lawn is dead. But artificial products have taken over. Now if you want to get rid of them due to AGW, then please do. Grass is good for the climate!!!
 

Crazy Finn

Hall of Fame
Old-time players had greater touch and were nimble, but the skill set of the modern player is wider than that. Precision with speed is harder to execute when you're grass-surfng.
Here's the skill set of modern players: Forehand, Backhand (probably), 1st Serve.

Older players practiced this thing called footwork that is in fairly seriously short supply on the current tours. It doesn't matter as on hardcourts, and you can slide your way around a clay court without it, but grass in unforgiving in that way.
 

Raul_SJ

G.O.A.T.
Here is the problem. The Wimbledon's organizer's statement does not consider the genetic modifications scientists have done to the new grass and does not look at the shoes the pro players are wearing. Obviously, the powers want no liabilities, do they?

Player's Union should be required to sign off on these court conditions before playing.
That way, we will all be spared Kyrgios' incessant whining.
 
The complaint showed us that they needed more warm-up tournaments or longer grass court season to gain more experience on this surface. 2-3 weeks of warm-up tournaments is not enough. You'll need more time with match play rather than practice. I think that Wimbledon needs to be flexible with their tournament schedule. A mid-July start rather than end of June start would be ideal. Grass court tournament is the only surface that provides variety on this court and most often showed shots of the year on this surface more so than other surface.
 
Top