Forehanderer
Professional
If you didn't want to respond, why respond thenIt's not a question. It's an ad hominem attack. I don't respond to such provocations.
If you didn't want to respond, why respond thenIt's not a question. It's an ad hominem attack. I don't respond to such provocations.
If you didn't want to respond, why respond then
Why do you have to have the last word in. Does it satisfy your ego that "I told him". If that's what you want, go aheadI didn't respond to his question.
Why do you have to have the last word in. Does it satisfy your ego that "I told him". If that's what you want, go ahead
What is "irrelevant" to the topic is your ignorant snub to the notion that those players may have worked extraordinarily hard to prepare for the tournament to see conditions beyond their expectations. Many of those fine pro athletes may not be in the position to just "skip the tournament". Would you not come to your office for the day, if you knew the floor was wet? Would you not come to work, if that meant you would not make money for that day?The surface has been approved by authorities as mentioned in the article. So wimbledon has no liabilities. If players find it not suitable for their game, they can skip the tournament rather than play with their HC/Clay technique. Your point about insurance and the topic of playing on ice is irrelevant.
""The slipping around we see now was unheard of in previous generations of tennis players accustomed to grass.""
Yes, older generations were more used to playing on grass, and there were far more grass courts and events to practice on. But take a look at old videos of them. They were far slower moving and less agile and athletic than today's players. It's a different game now with better equipment and far greater skills. The players have changed. The grass? Some, but not that much.
Wet grass is slippery . Oh my we should put a disclaimer on the big screen that it is slippery out there. Gimme a break. This is how it was and it will continue to be. Deal with it. Even Djokovic and Federer didn't blame Wimbledon on this issue. I'm more likely to take tennis related information from them than arm chair experts like you. As usual, you are resorting to different tangents. First it was playing on ice and now work place is wet. Stick to tennisWhat is "irrelevant" to the topic is your ignorant snub to the notion that those players may have worked extraordinarily hard to prepare for the tournament to see conditions beyond their expectations. Many of those fine pro athletes may not be in the position to just "skip the tournament". Would you not come to your office for the day, if you knew the floor was wet? Would you not come to work, if that meant you would not make money for that day?
Now, I believe that just about every pro tennis player has an insurance policy as much as the Wimbledon has one for itself. The authorities that approved Wimbledon's lab grass must have one fine carefully drafted insurance policy as well. Who is liable for the embarrassingly slippery grass conditions should not be decided by us.
So @Bartelby , how much grass court tennis have you actually played?
Unintelligent! Here is your break. Wet grass is wet, as you say, but it dries in a timely fashion as the water gets absorbed. On the other hand, some lab grass does not dry well for it is genetically modified not to accept as much water as some other (more natural) grass does. Having GM grass that does not need regular watering is very convenient but also risky as this kind of grass may not only keep the natural moisture or drizzle on itself, it may differ in its consistency. Ignoring those facts about such GM grass is despicable, given that we have our great heroes and the finnest sport on the planet Earth affected to a dangerous extent.Wet grass is slippery . Oh my we should put a disclaimer on the big screen that it is slippery out there. Gimme a break.
Unintelligent! Here is your break. Wet grass is wet, as you say, but it dries in a timely fashion as the water gets absorbed. On the other hand, some lab grass does not dry well for it is genetically modified not to accept as much water as some other (more natural) grass does. Having GM grass that does not need regular watering is very convenient but also risky as this kind of grass may not only keep the natural moisture or drizzle on itself, it may differ in its consistency. Ignoring those facts about such GM grass is despicable, given that we have our great heroes and the finnest sport on the planet Earth affected to a dangerous extent.
Hey intelligent one, check your spelling first. Rest of your post is just mind numbing nonsense. FailUnintelligent! Here is your break. Wet grass is wet, as you say, but it dries in a timely fashion as the water gets absorbed. On the other hand, some lab grass does not dry well for it is genetically modified not to accept as much water as some other (more natural) grass does. Having GM grass that does not need regular watering is very convenient but also risky as this kind of grass may not only keep the natural moisture or drizzle on itself, it may differ in its consistency. Ignoring those facts about such GM grass is despicable, given that we have our great heroes and the finnest sport on the planet Earth affected to a dangerous extent.
Bart playing tennis?
with so much arguing on this board, I'd expect that Bart doesn't play ANY tennis in real life
I haven't played since covid. And not only do I play tennis, but I paid for all my own tennis lessons. I didn't have parents funding me.
Players have always slipped at Wimbledon, nothing new. The only thing new is that, now they can play when the air is full of moisture, because of the roofs.
They are adults, who know full well of the risks involved, and are handsomely compensated. If the risks are too great for them, then don't play. Many others are only too willing to replace them, and assume the risks.
Athletes playing numerous other sports on grass fields also assume the same risks, even in pouring rain. The amateurs among them are not even paid a penny. Jesus, need everyone be treated like babies?
And if there is moisture in the air, then it will also fall onto the grass.
The idea of 'voluntary responsibility of risk' is no excuse for irresponsible management.
should clay courts be banned?
Tennis Channel at 2017 Roland-Garros - D. Goffin Retires From ... | Heavy heart for David Goffin, as he is forced to retire from 2017 ROLAND-GARROS due to injury. Horacio Zeballos to play the winner of Dominic... | By Tennis ChannelFacebook
Heavy heart for David Goffin, as he is forced to retire from 2017 ROLAND-GARROS due to injury. Horacio Zeballos to play the winner of Dominic...www.facebook.com
The courts should not be as slippery as they are, so they did not make enough allowance for inclement weather.
@Bartelby , how much grass court tennis have you actually played?
Open stance strokes is contemporary tennis. That's what is currently taught to everyone as the preferred stroke.
And not only do I play tennis, but I paid for all my own tennis lessons. I didn't have parents funding me.
No, the older generations of players were very athletic, quick as rabbits. Take a look at the footspeed of the great players of the fifties, very quick movers, Gonzales, Sedgman, Hoad, Rosewall, Laver, Gimeno, Olmedo, Segura, they knew how to get around. The Aussies under Hopman practiced sprints and long distance running.""The slipping around we see now was unheard of in previous generations of tennis players accustomed to grass.""
Yes, older generations were more used to playing on grass, and there were far more grass courts and events to practice on. But take a look at old videos of them. They were far slower moving and less agile and athletic than today's players. It's a different game now with better equipment and far greater skills. The players have changed. The grass? Some, but not that much.
No, the older generations of players were very athletic, quick as rabbits. Take a look at the footspeed of the great players of the fifties, very quick movers, Gonzales, Sedgman, Hoad, Rosewall, Laver, Gimeno, Olmedo, Segura, they knew how to get around. The Aussies under Hopman practiced sprints and long distance running.
The weight-lifting regimes of Sedgman and Hoad were legendary.
The players were as small as rabbits but as slow as snails. Their whirring little legs just gave the impression of speed. Grass court tennis required nimbleness but not speed.
thanks for enlightening us
can I ask you what meds are you on?
or what are you smoking?
I would like to try that stuff as well
I've seen many old time matches. Those guys weren't quick. They were nimble, that's all. Newcombe used to win matches with a hangover, not even Krygios can do that.
Far greater skills? You must be joking.""The slipping around we see now was unheard of in previous generations of tennis players accustomed to grass.""
Yes, older generations were more used to playing on grass, and there were far more grass courts and events to practice on. But take a look at old videos of them. They were far slower moving and less agile and athletic than today's players. It's a different game now with better equipment and far greater skills. The players have changed. The grass? Some, but not that much.
Someone who listens to German romantic music with their jumbo-sized orchestras has no right to complain about jumbo-sized racquets.
We need the tennis instructors to teach their students how to play on grass.Ymer just slipped in the backcourt - trainer on the way. Seems serious. Walking but limping... Being assessed...
Happened in the 3rd set, one set each, vs FAA.
A great tennis player is incomplete if he cannot play on grass, the surface which was used by the great players of the recent past and distant past.This is the bottom line - the courts are too slippery for today's elite players.
Tne players are more important than the pretty green grass.
If today's greats want to ignore tradition, I do not want to hear them or their supporters making any claims about how they rank in historical perspective.Grass is dangerous time to get rid of it screw tradition.
A great tennis player is incomplete if he cannot play on grass, the surface which was used by the great players of the recent past and distant past.
If today's greats want to be mentioned in the same category as the historic greats, they need to develop some basic tennis skills for tennis surfaces.
The use of hard rubber on cement is also a tough surface to endorse, the almost universal leg/knee injuries of the pros attest to that. I would not play on a hard rubber/cement surface.It's all well and good to say players should learn to play on grass. But reality prevents that. Exactly where are today's current pros and up-and-comers supposed to learn to play on grass? And when? And who is going to pay for it? Ivan Lendl had a grass court built at his home so he could win Wimbledon. Didn't work. Nadal has those in Mallorca. And a few others places have local grass courts, and some academies. But for the most part, for the rest of the world, there are fewer and fewer grass courts in existence. It's a dying surface, in more ways than one. We had 6 in our tennis-oriented, wealthy community, but those were bulldozed a couple decades ago. (they were fun, but the upkeep ). We have at least 7 private tennis clubs in town, some quite hoity-toity, plus several public court enclaves. There is not a single grass court at any of them. Not one.
Where are younger players who don't live in moist areas (where grass can grow in summer) going to practice. And when? The grass court season is about a month long, all the other events are clay or hardcourt. The thought is pretty that grass will still be important in decades to come. But the truth is it's an anachronism.
HEAR, HEAR! Yup! Baseball, football, soccer, golf are all played on grass! Tennis players and club owners are generally too cheap and shortsighted to support grass courts--it's a shame most players will not experience the joy of playing barefoot on grass courts.I recommend doing the right thing, bring back grass. Money is not the only consideration.
That's actually an excellent example of terrible footwork.
Here's the skill set of modern players: Forehand, Backhand (probably), 1st Serve.Old-time players had greater touch and were nimble, but the skill set of the modern player is wider than that. Precision with speed is harder to execute when you're grass-surfng.
Here is the problem. The Wimbledon's organizer's statement does not consider the genetic modifications scientists have done to the new grass and does not look at the shoes the pro players are wearing. Obviously, the powers want no liabilities, do they?
Player's Union should be required to sign off on these court conditions before playing.
That way, we will all be spared Kyrgios' incessant whining.