Novak is just goat, deal with that fact... He beat Nadal and Federer and he won't others? Really?
The issue with this reasoning is that outside of 9 months in 2011, Djokovic didn't dominate Federer and Nadal while they were still physically in their primes. Even Wawrinka and Murray were able to beat him in the middle of his prime. Federer's physical prime ended after 2012 with his 2013 injuries, Nadal's after 2013 and even Murray after 2013 due to his back surgery. 5 and 7 years after their physical primes ended respectively, Nadal and Federer were still by far the toughest competition for Djokovic in recent years at Wimbledon 2018/19 and RG20.
Three generations of young guys don't even come close. Stef went up two sets at RG and collapsed so thoroughly that the outcome was NID once the 3rd set started. Z immediately crumbled after winning each of his sets at the USO. Remember, Djokovic at 34 is still the
youngest elite talent and multi slam winner on tour. While Federer, Nadal, Murray all had physical issues start creeping in around 27-28, consistent with historical norms, Djokovic has conversely put up 13/20 slams and counting from that age onwards. For a guy that broke through at an elite level at age 19, that's pretty unusual. The only younger slam winners than Djokovic are:
1) Del Potro, who won his slam
13 years ago, only a year after Djokovic won his first. Their slam count was 1-1 for more than another full calendar year after this win and as we know injuries totally derailed Delpo's career within months of his breakthrough.
2) Cilic,
8 years ago, who was not far removed from a doping ban
3) Thiem, in a fluke win where Djokovic was DQ'd, a bunch of players didn't show up, and Z pulled off a Gasquet-tier choke in the final.
Trying to sugarcoat the younger generations by saying that they're just playing the GOAT wildly obfuscates the reality of the situation.
