WildRevolver
Hall of Fame
I personally think the 2011 version of Novak was the most complete, all-surface player ever. But Novak has always been a bit of a jack of all trades, specialist of none (not a bad thing at all). So would he have gotten any of the grand slams in 2006 or 07? That period was dominated by Fed's and Nadal's surface mastery.
AO: He'd have a better chance in 2006 to beat prime Roger, but at this point, the AO courts were tailor made for Roger's game. And in 07', Roger didn't lose a set from the quarters on.
FO: No. Not beating that Rafa. A more interesting hypothetical is if he'd beat Roger, and since the 2011 version of Roger beat Novak in 2011, I doubt it.
Wimbledon: No for 2006 but maybe in 2007. I tend to think not since 2011 wasn't Novak's best grass game (best was yet to come)
USO: In 2006 and 07 there were many experts wondering if Fed was ever going to lose the last two grand slams. Novak might have a better chance in 06 since Roger actually lost a set here and there, but in 07 the maestro was in utter control.
Hard to see where the win(s) would come.
AO: He'd have a better chance in 2006 to beat prime Roger, but at this point, the AO courts were tailor made for Roger's game. And in 07', Roger didn't lose a set from the quarters on.
FO: No. Not beating that Rafa. A more interesting hypothetical is if he'd beat Roger, and since the 2011 version of Roger beat Novak in 2011, I doubt it.
Wimbledon: No for 2006 but maybe in 2007. I tend to think not since 2011 wasn't Novak's best grass game (best was yet to come)
USO: In 2006 and 07 there were many experts wondering if Fed was ever going to lose the last two grand slams. Novak might have a better chance in 06 since Roger actually lost a set here and there, but in 07 the maestro was in utter control.
Hard to see where the win(s) would come.