Are we forgetting that the time span includes injuries and tragedy? Or is it simply convenient to do so?
That cracks me up how the "number" means so much. Which of those listed is considered the greatest? It sure isn't Court who has the most, which makes me wonder what indeed is the criteria. It seems they apply it to whomever they want, but the game that they played doesn't fit into today's game, therefore I will not take old stats and apply them to today's game. That is illogical to me. Even Evert said yesterday today's game doesn't even slightly resemble the game they played, so how can their numbers even apply?
Less than half what Henin did when Henin was on the tour playing and Serena was off due to injury. That's fair. LOL! How cool the way you omit that right before 3 QF's she was done a set and a break to Justine and came back and took the match. Then, after coming back again administered a 0-2 beatdown which makes the h2h 2-3, which doesn't support superiority either. Never mind Serena only played four tournaments one year as opposed to Justine's how many? If you're going to make an argument please include all the particular. I love how you all only report what you think supports your case and leave out so much pertinent information.
The game being different doesnt make it better. In Evert's day they played with wood raquets so of course the game was different. Do you think Serena would have been crushing the ball like she and others do if she were born to be in her prime in the 70s and played with wood in her hands. Graf won her 22 slams in the modern game anyway though, and Navratilova even won alot of her slams in the modern game. What are you going to argue, todays womens field is tougher then before, ROTFL!! Todays womens field sucks, it is a mess of injuries, inconsistency, early retirements, choking queens, a complete joke. Yet even with a field like that Serena still cant come close to these players in slam count somehow.
Yes you are right most dont rate Court on top but it is that whole Australian Open factor which would be another topic altogether. Because of this she really is more an 18-slam winner in most peoples estimation then a 24.
So you want to point out Serena had to come from way behind to beat Justine in her 1 win last year before her 3 quarterfinal losses. OK so you brought that up, how is that an argument in Serena's favor vs Justine. Her 3 losses were in the slams, the slams are by far the most important events and Justine won each. Also you are basically showing Serena needed Justine to choke away a big lead in order to get 1 of her 2 wins over Justine in the last couple years as well. I actually didnt bring that match up and the circumstances of her win since it would have been seen as a way of diminishing Serena if I did, but you brought it up on your own accord anyway.
Serena was not off "most" of the last 4+ years to injury. There have been 17 slams. Serena has played the vast majority of them. Look for yourself:
2004 Australian - did not play
2004 French - lost to Capriati in quarters
2004 Wimbledon- lost to Sharapova in final
2004 U.S Open- lost to Capriati in quarters
2005 Australian- won
2005 French- did not play
2005 Wimbledon- lost to Craybas in 3rd round
2005 U.S Open- lost to Venus in 4th round
2006 Australian- lost to Hantuchova in 3rd round
2006 French- did not play
2006 Wimbledon- did not play
2006 U.S Open- lost to Mauresmo in 4th round
2007 Australian- won
2007 French- lost to Henin in quarters
2007 Wimbledon- lost to Henin in quarters
2007 U.S Open- lost to Henin in quarters
2008 Australian- lost to Jankovic in quarters
So she only missed 4 of the 17 slams with injury. That is not "most". As her results show she is so far from dominant it is not even funny. Justine has also missed some slams with injury, similar to Serena. When you consider Justine's mono and other injuries she only has been about as healthy as Serena these last 4+ years:
2004 Australian- won
2004 French- lost 2nd round to Golovin
2004 Wimbledon- did not play
2004 U.S Open- lost 4th round to Petrova
2005 Australian- did not play
2005 French- won
2005 Wimbledon- lost 1st round to Daniilidou
2005 U.S Open- lost 4th round to Pierce
2006 Australian- lost final to Mauresmo
2006 French- won
2006 Wimbledon- lost final to Mauresmo
2006 U.S Open- lost final to Sharapova
2007 Australian- did not play
2007 French- won
2007 Wimbledon- lost semi to Bartoli
2007 U.S Open- won
2008 Australian- lost quarters to Sharapova
So Justine has missed 3 of 17 slams events with injury, almost the same # as Serena who missed 4 of 17. She has had her rough spots too but as one can plainly see her record in slams over the last 4+ years shows far better success then Serena by a long shot.
Justine has dealt with a serious case of mono, injuries, a divorce, an unstable family situation. If Serena played some of those slams not fully healthy so did Justine. She was certainly not healthy for the 2004 French Open, 2004 U.S Open, 2005 U.S Open, given that she took considerable time off soon after to deal with it. So she has had just as much as Serena these last 4+ years.