Grass GOAT

edmondsm

Legend
The reason this thread was missing is because most think it is a non-argument. It's Samp without question.

By the way, that is a sweet avatar. Very appropriate for a thread about grass.:)
 

fastdunn

Legend
sampras without a question so far. but i am not sure how good sampras would be on current slower bouncier grass courts.
 

gj011

Banned
The reason this thread was missing is because most think it is a non-argument. It's Samp without question.

By the way, that is a sweet avatar. Very appropriate for a thread about grass.:)

I thought claycourt GOAT is non-argument too.

Thanks :) I hope you can recognize who is on the picture.
 

kay87

New User
Who is GOAT, why is he GOAT,........

STOP the discussion, because I got him GOAT!

Here he is - GOAT:

GoatBoy.jpg


:)
 

zagor

Bionic Poster
Sampras in my opinion.I don't think I will change my opinion even if Federer were to somehow win 7 or 8 Wimbledons.
 

veroniquem

Bionic Poster
Sampras served like a machine on grass. Agassi was lucky in 91, he would never have beaten Sampras on grass!
 

ATXtennisaddict

Hall of Fame
Weren't a lot of older slams played on grass too? So you have to consider those greats who won non-wimby slams on grass.

But of course, Sampras takes the cake.
 

Lotto

Professional
Well Lads and Lassies. Sampras was a great on the grass no doubt and I believe he is the greatest. The thing is that if Federer wins 6 or 7 straight titles at Wimbledon and wins more Wimbledons then Sampras then he is the GOAT on grass because he beat him in 2001. Sampras has never beaten Fed on grass. But still Sampras is the best unless Federer cracks his record.
 

ninman

Hall of Fame
Well Lads and Lassies. Sampras was a great on the grass no doubt and I believe he is the greatest. The thing is that if Federer wins 6 or 7 straight titles at Wimbledon and wins more Wimbledons then Sampras then he is the GOAT on grass because he beat him in 2001. Sampras has never beaten Fed on grass. But still Sampras is the best unless Federer cracks his record.

Yes but Sampras's longest winning streak on grass was around 26 matches I believe, Federer is currently at 54. Sampras only ever managed 1 year unbeaten on grass, Federer has gone 5. Sampras won 3 in a row then 4 in a row at Wimbledon, Federer is at 5 in a row. Sampras was a great grass courter, and a brilliant serve and volleyer, but I think currently Federer's record is better.

I think for Federer to truly surpass Sampras, he needs to win Wimbledon 3 more times, i.e. the same years that Sampras won his last Wimbledon's.
 

superman1

Legend
Yes but Sampras's longest winning streak on grass was around 26 matches I believe, Federer is currently at 54. Sampras only ever managed 1 year unbeaten on grass, Federer has gone 5. Sampras won 3 in a row then 4 in a row at Wimbledon, Federer is at 5 in a row. Sampras was a great grass courter, and a brilliant serve and volleyer, but I think currently Federer's record is better.

I think for Federer to truly surpass Sampras, he needs to win Wimbledon 3 more times, i.e. the same years that Sampras won his last Wimbledon's.

I don't think it's exactly equal. The grass courts were faster when Sampras played, and a lot of his competition served big and volleyed well. Federer's grass court wins are mostly baseline battles against pure baseliners.
 

crawl4

Rookie
Yes but Sampras's longest winning streak on grass was around 26 matches I believe, Federer is currently at 54. Sampras only ever managed 1 year unbeaten on grass, Federer has gone 5. Sampras won 3 in a row then 4 in a row at Wimbledon, Federer is at 5 in a row. Sampras was a great grass courter, and a brilliant serve and volleyer, but I think currently Federer's record is better.

I think for Federer to truly surpass Sampras, he needs to win Wimbledon 3 more times, i.e. the same years that Sampras won his last Wimbledon's.

yeh true that

go fed
 

NLBwell

Legend
Laver
When people poke at him being the GOAT, they always say, "Well, 3 of the 4 slams were on grass then." Between 1962 (amateur) and 69 (open) he won 6 straight slam tournaments in a row on grass. He had a pretty impressive record in the intervening pro-only years, also.

He wasn't very big, but like Bobby Riggs, he used the grass to make his serve extremely difficult to return well. He was a better volleyer than Sampras and had better passing shots.
 
Last edited:

ej

Banned
I don't think it's exactly equal. The grass courts were faster when Sampras played, and a lot of his competition served big and volleyed well. Federer's grass court wins are mostly baseline battles against pure baseliners.

With today's slower surface, you also need a ground game. You need, say, a backhand. Pete is lucky he retired when you did.
 

leonidas1982

Hall of Fame
Can't really call Federer a grass GOAT since grass courts, especially Wimbledon, have lost their characteristics. Bjorn was great because he was able to change his baseline game to serve and volley for Wimbledon -- a real feat.
 

chiru

Professional
With today's slower surface, you also need a ground game. You need, say, a backhand. Pete is lucky he retired when you did.

its remarkable how many kids these days don't remember that once upon a time ppl thought sampras' one hander may have been the best at that time.
 

flyer

Hall of Fame
Greatness on grass is measured by Wimbledon trophies, as of now it is absolutely no debate, Fed I highly doubt will catch him either....Its Pete Sampras
 

vince916

Semi-Pro
I wonder how the courts are really like these days.

People say Wimbledon is slower. Then when Federer beat Nadal last year at Hamburg people mentioned it wasnt a true clay court since it played fast.
 

Zimbo

Semi-Pro
I don't think it's exactly equal. The grass courts were faster when Sampras played, and a lot of his competition served big and volleyed well. Federer's grass court wins are mostly baseline battles against pure baseliners.

I agree with you here but even if the grass didn't change I think Fed would still have won all his Wimbledon tittles. That said my vote would be Sampras. Behind Pete in no particular order would be Mac, Fed, Becker, Borg, and Edberg. I can't add the old timers (Laver etc......) cause I never saw them played.
 

superman1

Legend
With today's slower surface, you also need a ground game. You need, say, a backhand. Pete is lucky he retired when you did.

Lolz. I'm sure Agassi is kicking himself right now, thinking, "damn, I should have gone to Pete's backhand! Then I would have won every point!"

Sampras won the US Open 5 times. I'd say he was pretty damn good from the baseline.
 

superman1

Legend
I agree with you here but even if the grass didn't change I think Fed would still have won all his Wimbledon tittles. That said my vote would be Sampras. Behind Pete in no particular order would be Mac, Fed, Becker, Borg, and Edberg. I can't add the old timers (Laver etc......) cause I never saw them played.

We'll never know. Wimbledon is a neutral surface now, back then it was a polarizing surface. Even if you were great on the stuff, like Sampras, once in a while you could meet someone who could serve lights out and bring it down to a couple of points here and there.
 

kaiotic

Rookie
the fact that Sampras almost won Wimbledon 8 straight, to win 7 in the 8-yr span. I say Pete is the man. pretty F*cking amazing.
 

deme08

Professional
Federer's 5 straight Wimbledon tiltes and 54 matches (and counting) winning streak on grass are amazing accomplishments.
 

joeri888

G.O.A.T.
1. Sampras
2. Federer
3. Borg

Federer isn't the GOAT on any surface, but he might very well be the GOAT of tennis, because he's so good on every surface
 

Francella

New User
Smart - so smart

:cool:
This thread is missing after the other two.

My vote goes to Sampras too

My vote goes for Pete, too. I saw part of Philadelphia in 1990...and was totally caught up in his play. Then, saw his first US Open win...that little skinny kid beating MacEnroe, Lendl and Agassi...whoa. I was caught hook line and sinker and have been amazed at what he's done, and still live a decent life. Moms and point to him as a real sportsman for their kids...and that's great, too.:)
 

Francella

New User
Fed, a bit red?

Federer's 5 straight Wimbledon tiltes and 54 matches (and counting) winning streak on grass are amazing accomplishments.

He's terrific, but he's had a hard year so far....wonder if it's cause of Pete, or mono:shock:

Francella
 

Francella

New User
It's got to be Krajicek because he beat the grass King on his beloved surface and in his prime. :wink:


Yeap....I saw the match at Wimby when Krajicek won. boy was he cool that day. you could see it on his face..."ok, Pete, see if you can knock this tree over? So I wasn't happy at the end of that match....since Pete's #1 to me. But I always like Richard........more than Fed. Francella
 

Francella

New User
With today's slower surface, you also need a ground game. You need, say, a backhand. Pete is lucky he retired when you did.

But Pete's playing again...and he's going to do that round robin in London in December...that's competition, not just expos. But he showed well against Fed even if the overall score is now 3-1. I was at MSG, and Pete was tired that last set....but oh so painfully close to taking it at 5-3. It's still a real pleasure to watch him play; his style is just so so so beautiful on court. Guess you can tell I'm a real fan.:)
Francella
 

Francella

New User
Greatness on grass is measured by Wimbledon trophies, as of now it is absolutely no debate, Fed I highly doubt will catch him either....Its Pete Sampras

You don'think Fed will surpass Pete? He's still young, and only has to win 3 more? I don't like it, but I've accepted it; I just wish Fed had come along 10 years from now so that Pete could enjoy his GOAT longer.
Francella
 

Francella

New User
You don'think Fed will surpass Pete? He's still young, and only has to win 3 more? I don't like it, but I've accepted it; I just wish Fed had come along 10 years from now so that Pete could enjoy his GOAT longer.
Francella


p.s. There's still that 6 years#1 to overcome, too
 
Top