The serves seem a bit abbreviated, but other than that I don't see why not. But I would call them low 4.0s.
I wish I could play in an NTRP tournament like that. Honestly, I think I could easily beat them.
Most if not all of the time, only 3.5 and 4.0 USTA rated players can play USTA 4.0 matches so they are either 3.5 or 4.0 unless they are sandbagging.
They are 4 levels from being a pro so I'm not sure why people are saying their strokes don't look pretty. If they look gorgeous now, how much prettier are they going to look at 4.5? Besides, a great looking stroker at the 3.0 level will never beat a special olympics stroker at the 4.0 level because how good you are depends on who you beat in a match, not in a beauty contest!
Why does it say they are #2 4.0's? Not nationally for sure? I clicked on the side on the number 1 singles guy and he looked worse than them???
They might be good enough for 4.0, but I doubt they're even solid 3.5's right now in tournament play.
It's not only the serve and strokes, it's your mental play that gets you your highest levels.
What's their tournament RESULTS?
If they haven't played, they are 2.5's until they can prove otherwise.
... No, just no.the NTRP ratings on the website can be interpreted in many ways
for me, 4.0 would be very good
the people in that video look 3.0
if these guys are 4.0 then i am 5.5
most people on this forum wont beat these guys, it takes more than good strokes and top of the line gear to win a match...
I wish I could play in an NTRP tournament like that. Honestly, I think I could easily beat them.
the NTRP ratings on the website can be interpreted in many ways
for me, 4.0 would be very good
the people in that video look 3.0
if these guys are 4.0 then i am 5.5
if they're 4.0 i must be a 5.5-6.0 :S ahah
yes... it takes good fitness, concentration and most importantly - skills...
these guys are old... (they cant move very fast) and movement is a killer
they should resort to other sports like ... golf or something
I don't know why people post stuff like this. We are talking 4.0 tennis here. The vast majority of adult league and tournament tennis is played by 30-50 year olds. I have seen a ton of NTRP matches and players in their 20s at this level get beaten by the older players all the time.
most people on this forum wont beat these guys, it takes more than good strokes and top of the line gear to win a match...
They might be good enough for 4.0, but I doubt they're even solid 3.5's right now in tournament play.
It's not only the serve and strokes, it's your mental play that gets you your highest levels.
What's their tournament RESULTS?
If they haven't played, they are 2.5's until they can prove otherwise.
Raiden...
At the end of my competitive tennis days, I was still officially ranked 4.5 according to the powers to be....
I had just won 4 rounds qualifying in my second TranAmerica attempt, losing in the 5th round, to some 6'4" Aucklander. RusselSimpson.
The inter bay league people invited me to play A league.
The BATL (BayAreaTennisLeague), different from the first, said I had to play A or Open only.
I was still ranked 4.5 !!
JohnLucas invited me to sit in on local TeamTennis practices, and hit with the players. I was hoping for a spot!
I was still ranked 4.5!:evil:
And 30 years later, I still claim 4.0 because I regularly hit with 5.5 or higher Mens players or top 18 Junior Mens'.
NO, they'd kick my butt in a match, but even they need practice against a real lefty serve.
I suspect the opposite!
For league play around here, Berkeley, California, I could easily play 5.5 and be somewhat competitive.
For an actual sanctioned tournament, I know real 4.5's who can beat me up pretty badly.
But I was ranked 4.5, never higher officially.
So maybe it depends on the region, the state, and the whims of the tournament directors.
FYI, in like '86, 7 years after NO tennis, the MtTam racket club made me play 6.0 singles. I lost first round.
Skillwise, I should have made the FINALS. I lost to the #1 seed in 3 sets who WON the finals his third time in a row.
Still, I lost in the first round, making me what....maybe a 4.5?
Post your videos and then if you really are better then you guys can keep talking trash.
I suspect the opposite!
For league play around here, Berkeley, California, I could easily play 5.5 and be somewhat competitive.
For an actual sanctioned tournament, I know real 4.5's who can beat me up pretty badly.
But I was ranked 4.5, never higher officially.
So maybe it depends on the region, the state, and the whims of the tournament directors.
FYI, in like '86, 7 years after NO tennis, the MtTam racket club made me play 6.0 singles. I lost first round.
Skillwise, I should have made the FINALS. I lost to the #1 seed in 3 sets who WON the finals his third time in a row.
Still, I lost in the first round, making me what....maybe a 4.5?
Raiden...
At the end of my competitive tennis days, I was still officially ranked 4.5 according to the powers to be....
I had just won 4 rounds qualifying in my second TranAmerica attempt, losing in the 5th round, to some 6'4" Aucklander. RusselSimpson.
The inter bay league people invited me to play A league.
The BATL (BayAreaTennisLeague), different from the first, said I had to play A or Open only.
I was still ranked 4.5 !!
JohnLucas invited me to sit in on local TeamTennis practices, and hit with the players. I was hoping for a spot!
I was still ranked 4.5!:evil:
And 30 years later, I still claim 4.0 because I regularly hit with 5.5 or higher Mens players or top 18 Junior Mens'.
NO, they'd kick my butt in a match, but even they need practice against a real lefty serve.
trash? i dont claim to be the worlds best tennis player, but im gettn better everytime i play... and i can easily distinguish my skill level from others, i know alot of you guys on this forum would be better than me and alot of you would be worse, but i can clearly see im much better than these guys, and i would rate myself a 4.5-5.0 based on the vids u guys post up