The attached pictures shows the Pro Staff Classic 85 is in the same geometry as 95 sq in. version (oval cross-section) but smaller head sized.
For almost two decades, tennis enthusiasts have been questioning about what Stefan Edberg actually used during the early 90's. Apparently he really used the Pro Staff Original 85 in Pro Staff Classic paintjob what is noticeable on many vintage photos of sports magazines but that is not the absolute correct answer. He had briefly used the Pro Staff Classic 85 indeed. The attached pictures shows the Pro Staff Classic 85 is in the same geometry as 95 sq in. version (oval cross-section) but smaller head sized.
How many Pro Staff Classic 6.1 85s do you own? How does it play?
Does anyone know WHY Wilson didn't release all those wonderful 85-sq.in.s from Edberg, Graf, Mandlikova, Hlasek, ...???
(At least not in Europe)
Congrats!I got one few days ago, bought by e bay in Japan.
PS original 85 with classic pj.
Weight 332 gr unstung, 346 full.
Nice babe.
L15
He played a racket this light???
I also purchased the Japan version a year back or so but I didn't string it up, just for collection.Edberg's personal PS Original with Classic paint job racket is 360g (unstrung) and 8pts head light.
The one what Love15 have bought from Japan should be the public version, it's not the same specs as Edberg actually used.
I'm also looking forward for the feedback of how that public verson plays by Love15.
Equijet, how could I get in touch with you? If possible, could you drop me an e-mail to 4144441@gmail.com
Thank you in advance, Andrei
I have two Pro Staff Original 85 with Classic paint job without bumper guards, three with bumper guards, three Pro Staff Classic 85, one Pro staff Classic 6.1 and two Pro Staff Classic 6.0.
The Pro Staff Classic 85 is a very maneuverable racket due to its head is very light weight and thanks for the oval cross section contributes the good aerodynamic condition but those are also the disadvantage conditions what compares with the legendary PS Original on the sensational feels from the ball impacts.
I was about to say the same! THANKS EquijetI was a huge Edberg fan and never even noticed this. I thought he used a Prostaff 6.0 with a 6.0 paintjob.
^^ let me rephrase
What string pattern is that 95, is it the euro version?
A buddy of mine has one of Edbergs frames.. he got it a the the Aussie Open one year from Stefan. I maybe can post a few pictures if you guys are interested.
The euro version is 18x20 string pattern and some of those says "Tour edition" on the frame.
Thanks again Equijet for your pics...
I remember having this discussion with a friend back in the early 90's on Edberg's racket. He had both the Pro Staff Classic as well as the PS Original. After looking at various photos in magazines back then, we were convinced that it was indeed an Original with the Classic PJ... Thinking back, it was my first exposure to "PJ" player-edition rackets...
So there isn't a difference between the Tour and the euro 18x20 version right?
I have two Pro Staff Original 85 with Classic paint job without bumper guards, three with bumper guards, three Pro Staff Classic 85, one Pro staff Classic 6.1 and two Pro Staff Classic 6.0.
The Pro Staff Classic 85 is a very maneuverable racket due to its head is very light weight and thanks for the oval cross section contributes the good aerodynamic condition but those are also the disadvantage conditions what compares with the legendary PS Original on the sensational feels from the ball impacts.
Equijet, could you please advise if I could get in touch with you via e-mail?
Thank you very much in advance,
Andrei