Guys you need to understand a few things...
1) quickstart actually allows players to learn faster and learn more
2) development of a tennis player takes over 10 years ... why are you in so much of a rush to play on an adult sized court
3) no country that has started Quickstart format player development has stopped doing it... it is used by all the GSlam nations plus over 100 more countries...
4) using it as a player development tool is a fairly new concept so the results of this programme will be seen in 10 years time .. not now.. and to argue that this is not the way todays pros learned is crazy arguement.. the real question is which players in 10 years wll be at the top wh did no use this approach...
5) there is a big diffrence between playing the game and hitting the ball.. QS allows players to "do" someting to the ball not just win the collision.. to say my kid can hit on this court is no a valid reason for them to be there... if they an tactically execute a plan and problem solve then your arguement is valid... QS allows players to develop faster technically and tactically
6) the list goes on...
The fact is QS is the wrong name for the programme .. it is a 5 year systematic player development programme.. you just dont realise yet...
Dont knock it till you really understand it.. you will change your mind.. I did ...
25 years in Performance Junior Development at High Performance Level..
Most tennis coaches start 3-4 year olds with softer balls and only playing a small part of the court. Thats been done forever.
Any "tactical" advantage of mini tennis is most likely irrelevant as kids can learn that very easily at 8-9-10-12-14....it is an ongoing process. No advantage is gained by doing that earlier.
This is what I think works better....the way Agassi and the Williams sisters and Roddick most likely learned. (In fact, we know Andre larned this way, it is in his dad's interviews) It is the way I am teaching my own kid.
1. Learn power and racquet speed and proper low to high wrap around first. Use low compression balls, ball machines, let the little ones blast away. Ignore where the balls go. In a few months they are hitting beautiful low balls with topspin from baseline to baseline. Rallying and strategy is irrelevant....proper strokes with top racquet speed is more important.
2. Once they have great power and racquet speed from both sides, introduce targets. Cones at various positions, etc. Let them naturally learn to hit those same pro looking shots at cones all over the court. Let them learn hard shots vs soft lobs with cones closer to the net. The control developes easily.
3. Introduce regular balls at an age appropriate for each kids ability.
4. Next introduce concepts while they hit of moving the opponent and constructing a point properly. This is a 5-10 year ongoing process.
I think developing great strokes and natural power and racquet speed at the earliest possible age is 1000000 times more important than having 3-8 year olds worrying about strategy and rallying with the tiny kid across the net....or whether the ball hits the net or goes out of bounds.
We have 4-5-6 year olds who hit low rockets or lobs from one baseline and can hit within 2 feet of a target placed anywhere on the opposite court. They can catch up and return short balls with ease. They can get from corner to corner and hit backhands and forehands. Tennis courts are not that big....5-6 year olds have the legs to cover it very well when properly trained on how to efficiently move.
They will learn strategy as they age....and will have brilliant, powerful, non moonballing shots to execute that strategy with.
Most ladies at any tennis club can rally back and forth all day long and have wonderful strategy. But they never developed the racquet speed or power and never will. I want my kids looking like mini Nadals rather than tennis club ladies.
Now in 10 years how do we determine if Mini Tennis works? Ask each Grand Slam champ if they played it, or every top 100 pro, or every pro and D-1 player? Seems to me it will be hard to prove mini tennis does any good unless someone interviews a ton of great players.