40 chances, LOL! Murray is turning 24 very shortly. He isnt going to play another 10 years, and if he does he will be a struggling journeyman in his 30s. Look at how much Federer is struggling before turning 29, not reaching a slam final for over a year. If that is happening to Federer, Murray will have NO chance at that age.
So lets by more realistic and say 14 more chances, lets say until the end of 2014. No chance he ever wins the French so cut that down to 11. I could easily see him not winning a slam in around 11 chances with better players than him around that whole time (most likely).
He will never in a slam. Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic will continue to win all the slams until the end of 2014 probably. Del Potro if healthy could win 1 or 2 more in that span. I know Murray owns Del Potro but Del Potro actually has the weapons and mental toughness to beat those 3 others in a slam final which Murray does not. And by then Murray will be 27, and the current pathetic generation of up and comers born 89-91 will be replaced by a likely better generation after that who will be ready to make their mark by then.
He will never in a slam. Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic will continue to win all the slams until the end of 2014 probably. Del Potro if healthy could win 1 or 2 more in that span. I know Murray owns Del Potro but Del Potro actually has the weapons and mental toughness to beat those 3 others in a slam final which Murray does not. And by then Murray will be 27, and the current pathetic generation of up and comers born 89-91 will be replaced by a likely better generation after that who will be ready to make their mark by then.
NadalAgassi will never win a Slam. I can say that for sure but to say a player who has been in the top 4 for 3 years and reached three Slam finals and two Slam semis and beaten all the top 10 players, will NEVER win a Slam, is absolutely ridiculous.
He will never in a slam. Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic will continue to win all the slams until the end of 2014 probably. Del Potro if healthy could win 1 or 2 more in that span. I know Murray owns Del Potro but Del Potro actually has the weapons and mental toughness to beat those 3 others in a slam final which Murray does not. And by then Murray will be 27, and the current pathetic generation of up and comers born 89-91 will be replaced by a likely better generation after that who will be ready to make their mark by then.
40 chances, LOL! Murray is turning 24 very shortly. He isnt going to play another 10 years, and if he does he will be a struggling journeyman in his 30s. Look at how much Federer is struggling before turning 29, not reaching a slam final for over a year. If that is happening to Federer, Murray will have NO chance at that age.
So lets by more realistic and say 14 more chances, lets say until the end of 2014. No chance he ever wins the French so cut that down to 11. I could easily see him not winning a slam in around 11 chances with better players than him around that whole time (most likely).
Just sign my name along side yours whenever you defend your perspectives on this Murray case.
Everything you wrote here is also what I think.
Just sign my name along side yours whenever you defend your perspectives on this Murray case.
Everything you wrote here is also what I think.
Just sign my name along side yours whenever you defend your perspectives on this Murray case.
Everything you wrote here is also what I think.
You'll have your answer on the third of July, but I can give you a sneak preview: it's "yes".
And LOL at Mainad accusing Buckethead of being me. The desperation and stuipdity of the worst of the Murraytards knows no bounds.
Just like even as Murray continues to fail to win even a single slam title Murraytards continue to pump how great he is. Hilarious some stupid Murraytards before the French Open semi were even complaining I was downplaying Murray to say he had no chance and would probably lose in straights. Of course inevitably he loses in straights just as I called.
Not to mention many of the stupid Murraytards who are in this exact thread saying the only one who can beat Murray is himself, and then calling anyone who says otherwise a hater. Yeah a slamless player in his mid 20s controls his own destiny vs people like a 16 slam winner, a 25 year old 9 slam winner, or someone who has lost only 1 match all year.
And LOL at Mainad accusing Buckethead of being me. The desperation and stuipdity of the worst of the Murraytards knows no bounds.
What is this weird term 'Murraytard' you like to lob in my direction? I'm not blind to his faults and weaknesses but unlike you I respect him as a player and can see his potential whereas you don't and can't! You are the exact opposite of a 'Murraytard' and therefore just as bad.
What has Murray ever done to you? Did he sleep with your boyfriend or girlfriend or something? Where does all this weird and disturbing hatred come from? What's it to you whether or not Murray wins a Slam or not? If he does he does,if he doesn't,he doesn't.End of story.If you don't like him as a player,which you clearly don't,then don't bother posting about him.Post about the people you DO like (Nadal & Agassi presumably). Try and be positive for them instead of wasting your time here and on other threads spewing your silly bile about Murray NEVER going to do this or Murray NEVER going to do that.Yadda yadda yadda!! Yawn yawn yawn!! Try adopting a little humility and modify your cast-iron certainties about what Murray may or may not do with a bit of reflection that you might JUST be proved wrong.But I guess that's just too much for you to take on board!
I suggest you stop posting and talking about Murray for the good of your mental health.Chill out,lighten up and try and develop a sense of humour.If you do,you may not actually end up in a mental ward screaming 'Murray will NEVER win a Slam' where only the warders and the other inmates will be able to hear you.
Take it as a friendly warning!
blah blah blah idiot. Very few of my posts here are about your beloved Murray. I have posted far more posts about Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, Sampras, Agassi, Serena, Henin, Venus, Graf, Seles, and many others than I have about Murray. If you are so desperate to find out for yourself just do a search on my posts. I am free to give opinions about both players I like and dont and will do that and do so without any qualms. Usually I ignore the bandit of idiots like yourself, this is one of the only times I waste my time even acknowledging your sorry existence. And you are the one obviously worked up about my opinions or how Murray does than I am. I just give my opinions and laugh at those who get so bothered by them.
What is the highest number of slam finals someone's been in, without winning one ?
There were six men (Frank Riseley, Frank Hunter, Harry Hopman, Bunny Austin, Eric Sturgess and Andy Murray) who were runner up in three Grand Slams and never won one.
Lol...laugh?? You don't laugh! You don't have a sense of humour in your entire body. Who's interested in your opinions about a player you don't like? Because we know you don't like him so we don't need you clogging up board space here with your endless,boring,repetitious litanies of why and how you don't like him! Nobody's interested.Go away and talk about all those players you DO like.You have nothing valuable,informative or anything remotely interesting to contribute to this particular thread.You're just a joke.We all laugh at you! And if you're really not bothered about my opinions,then you won't waste any more of my and your time by bothering to reply to this will you??
For a person criticizing another about his behavior, you come off as incredibly bitter...hostile. Are you that new to TW? I ask because anyone finding anything unusual about members criticizing players must not be all that familiar with the routine here.
That said, Murray is not above criticism--he has been hyped by fans and talking heads alike for years--always promising a major was right around the corner. Well, that corner has been circled a few times, which leads anyone to (objectively) observe that he has problems with making the big move. That is not a crime...though the overreactions of some Murray fans would lead one to think some were wishing a grave illness on the guy.
If you want to be pissed off at anyone, aim that anger at the talking heads like Gilbert and Cahill, or some of his most vocal fans, who keep that "he's about to break through" song playing year after year, in the face of no results.
Guys - if NadalAgassi gets too full of himself, just threaten to report him to the mods for his multiple IDs. He'll soon STFU and get back in his box - wontcha Davey?
So that's why there are so many pr*cks on the forum.
The number of pr*cks on the forum usually increase when Nadal wins another major (seen recently), someone questions Federer's status, or Serena simply breathes. At that point, a boatload of aliases appear, all claming to be "lurkers," but conveniently appear to attack the same players, like clockwork.
Pretty much. One of which is always TMF. The individual who accuses me of having multiple aliases in those particular threads to detract from what he/she probably is no doubt really doing. I imagine he/she has trouble functioning with daily life when so much as Federer loses a match or when Serena wins one.
PS- as for the talking heads in this thread I have only one username. Any idiot who wants to suggest something or complain can go right ahead and it will prove pointless.
blah blah blah idiot. Very few of my posts here are about your beloved Murray. I have posted far more posts about Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, Sampras, Agassi, Serena, Henin, Venus, Graf, Seles, and many others than I have about Murray. If you are so desperate to find out for yourself just do a search on my posts. I am free to give opinions about both players I like and dont and will do that and do so without any qualms. Usually I ignore the bandit of idiots like yourself, this is one of the only times I waste my time even acknowledging your sorry existence. And you are the one obviously worked up about my opinions or how Murray does than I am. I just give my opinions and laugh at those who get so bothered by them.
It's interesting that,to you,I'M the one who comes across as incredibly hostile and bitter when I wasn't the one who said this (about me),quote:
"blah blah blah idiot. Usually I ignore the bandit of idiots like yourself, this is one of the only times I waste my time even acknowledging your sorry existence."
In other exchanges he/she has frequently referred to me as 'stupid' or 'ignorant' for daring to defend Murray's abilities against his own caste-iron certainties to the contrary.When attacked and provoked on a personal basis like that I admit I tend to reply in kind.I don't see why I should just roll over for those kind of personal attacks.I am never the one to initiate them. Please check any of my other posts if you don't believe me.All I wish to do is discuss tennis players and their performances without being subjected to these kind of personal attacks.I have no objection whatsoever to people taking a different view to mine about Murray or any other player.What I object to is people like this poster who pronounce opinions as if they are the Pope making an infallible statement and then launch scathing attacks on me personally if I dare to challenge them in any way.It is downright rude,discourteous and totally unnecessary and I will defend myself against them.
Others,like yourself,may disagree but no one has the right to say with cast-iron certainty what he will do and will not do.All we have are our opinions which may differ but should always be expressed in a courteous manner that doesn't try to belittle or disparage someone else for daring to think differently.
Well they're tennis experts and they have the right to their opinion as well.The rest is just run of the mill hype and media talk.Every country likes to talk and hype up their own players' abilities especially when they have just the one top player like Britain has with Murray. It's as natural and inevitable as night and day.
The more cautious and sensible of us recognise the difference between hype and reasoned assessment. But why should you care one way or the other? Either Murray will finally justify the hype by winning a Major or he won't and you and others will have the satisfaction of knowing that what you suspected was right all along.
And I'm beginning to wonder how many usernames that his close friend thundervolley has on this board.
Dude, they're ganging up on you.
Just let the Murraytards be happy thinking the Chewpa cabbra can win a major. LOL.
I hate Murray. I hope he loses first round. Murray will never win a Slam and I hope all his fans here are miserable and I wish bad will on all mankind.
Happy?