My team lost one regular season match under circumstances that I still consider bothersome. We played at a very nice club near Harrisburg and the team used practice balls for the match.
They were unmarked so the captain identified the balls with a magic marker. Worse than their lack of markings, these things were extremely spongy. They really compressed against the string bed on impact and they seemed to stay on the racquet forever.
After the match, I checked and these balls were not on the USTA approved list. Our captain mentioned this to an official who told him the balls were the home team's choice. If that's true, why does the USTA publish a list of approved balls? And where do you draw the line? Could they issue racquet balls or those multi-colored kiddie balls?
http://www.usta.com/2011_usta_approved_tennis_ball_list/
BTW: We faced Team Spongy Balls in the playoffs and the USTA provided tour balls for the tournament. Revenge was ours....
They were unmarked so the captain identified the balls with a magic marker. Worse than their lack of markings, these things were extremely spongy. They really compressed against the string bed on impact and they seemed to stay on the racquet forever.
After the match, I checked and these balls were not on the USTA approved list. Our captain mentioned this to an official who told him the balls were the home team's choice. If that's true, why does the USTA publish a list of approved balls? And where do you draw the line? Could they issue racquet balls or those multi-colored kiddie balls?
http://www.usta.com/2011_usta_approved_tennis_ball_list/
BTW: We faced Team Spongy Balls in the playoffs and the USTA provided tour balls for the tournament. Revenge was ours....