Frying Pan Forehand
Rookie
He ain't making the final, could have lost more than 1 set to baghdatis.If he is lucky to make it past Del Potro will get finished by tsonga anyway.
Murray, with his 5-1 head to head, will be extremely lucky to get past Delpo.
But that's all moot anyway - he's got to get past Cilic fisrt.
Del Potro has enough power to hit murray of the court. Wimbledon grass helps Del Potro and so does the british press which hypes Murray to the likes of Nadal, Djokovic, Federer.
Murray is the prototype of a loser, had 3 chaces to win a GS and didn't even take a set.
Del Potro has enough power to hit murray of the court. Wimbledon grass helps Del Potro and so does the british press which hypes Murray to the likes of Nadal, Djokovic, Federer.
Murray is the prototype of a loser, had 3 chaces to win a GS and didn't even take a set.
1. Delpo may have the power, but he certainly doesn't have the stamina or footwork to keep up with murray on grass.
2. Murray lost 3 GS finals, 2 to Federer and 1 to Djokovic, who were all playing brilliantly throughout the entire tournament.
You don't need footwork when you dictate the play as Rosol showed us.Del Potro can play like Rosol on steroids and Murray for sure ain't the one to stop that.
Yawn! H2H: Murray 5 -1 Del Potro! So, of course, Murray has no chance against him, has he?
And just when is Del Potro going to start playing like Rosol on steroids whenever he comes up against the top 4 players? He choked away a 2 set lead against Fed at RG a few weeks ago. 2009 USO is nearly 3 years ago now!
Let's see how he fares against #6 seed Ferrer, first. Even HE has a 4-2 H2H lead on him!
You don't need footwork when you dictate the play as Rosol showed us.Del Potro can play like Rosol on steroids and Murray for sure ain't the one to stop that.
Well to be fair, Murray is not exactly notorious for clutch play (opposite of choke) at Grand Slam level.
At least Del Potro has proven that if goes into berserk mode he's damn near unplayable. If they do meet, and Del Potro is slapping the ball silly I like his chances a lot.
Sure, but that doesn't exactly mean Murray doesn't have a chance either, does it? Del Potro has proven he can do this just that ONE time and, as I say, that is nearly 3 years ago now.
Given Delpo's losing track record against the top 4 ever since that 2009 USO win, it's far from certain that he will be able to repeat the performance. With him, fitness issues are never far from the surface for starters. .
LOL what hype??? Nobody in England likes the chump.
Murray will win Wimbledon.
LOL what hype??? Nobody in England likes the chump.
Del potro and murray didn't play after 2009.
Nice profile pic BTW.
Well, if there's no hype, what's the problem and why are we having this thread?
And maybe certain English types (like you?) are just jealous because they haven't got any tennis players worth talking about. Unlike Scotland!
He dates Mr.Blobby and looks like a donkey. Why in the blue hell would I be jealous of that?
BTW, Oliver Golding is the future on British Tennis.Comprende?
Del Potro has enough power to hit murray of the court. Wimbledon grass helps Del Potro and so does the british press which hypes Murray to the likes of Nadal, Djokovic, Federer.
Murray is the prototype of a loser, had 3 chaces to win a GS and didn't even take a set.
Murray, with his 5-1 head to head, will be extremely lucky to get past Delpo.
But that's all moot anyway - he's got to get past Cilic fisrt.
LOL what hype??? Nobody in England likes the chump.
Ah, personal abuse. The surest signs of plain jealousy when you can't think of anything better to say!
And when Oliver comes up with the goods, I'll be rooting for him. Incidentally, I note he's 18 years and 9 months old now. At that same age, Murray won his first main-tour ATP title!
And you were invited to play challengers in Europe, right?
Del potro and murray didn't play after 2009.
Are you okay Morpheus, you can't take the blue pill in the world ahhhh sh** too late.
Taking class and coherent argument to new heights as ever, eh Bob?
You're nothing buy a Johnny come lately glory hunter - to paraphrase the famous terracing chant - where we you when Noel was sh1t?
Because you certainly weren't posting on here.
Murray will win Wimbledon.
Ah, personal abuse. The surest signs of plain jealousy when you can't think of anything better to say!
And when Oliver comes up with the goods, I'll be rooting for him. Incidentally, I note he's 18 years and 9 months old now. At that same age, Murray won his first main-tour ATP title!
It seams someone forgot to take their medication today?
And so will I.
The Little Englanders like Bob really are a poisonous lot are they not? Bob's post is most informative - there's clearly one reason and one reason only why Murray gets abuse. I wouldn't mind if their precious football team didn't make Murray look like the epitome of the most mentally strong, clutch slam player ever.
Murray is a loser, 3 slam finals not even a set.
Ooooh - someone douse me with a bucket of water. Bob's comebacks are just flaming me alive.
So Mr Hunter - did you start supporting Noel when you realised exactly how sh1t the Ingerlund football team were?
i play recreational tennis for fun and health, you got me confused.What does that make you then Challenger Dude?
No captain, I supported Novak back about hhmmm 2007 when he was kicking a** and taking names, unlike a scrawny little turd who wouldn't know the meaning of "offense" if it was read right in front of him... sir.
i play recreational tennis for fun and health, you got me confused.
And yeah, murray is still a loser.
You, like Bob, have taken cogent argument to a new height on this thread - give yourself an 'I don't care what the data says' badge - it'll lok nice on you.
1-5 Delpo for the win! It's so obvious to those with proper tennis knowledge.
Murray no set in 3 gs final, Del potro won at first try. You know what they say about guyz who lose their first gs final?
They will never be great, and in this case murray is just another loser.
Really - so how come it took you until he was winning everything in sight before posting on here?
You're a glory hunter who hates Murray because he doesn't love the Ingerlund football team enough.
People can see wha tyou are - there's no need dress it up. If Oli the Ingerlishman was any good you'd drop Noel like a stone.
You're just a tennis version of a Manu fan form Surrey.
You, like Bob, have taken cogent argument to a new height on this thread - give yourself an 'I don't care what the data says' badge - it'll lok nice on you.
1-5 Delpo for the win! It's so obvious to those with proper tennis knowledge.
Lendl isn't g8?
dayyuuumm..
I like you batz, I really do but this, this.. rudeness has to stop my friend.
I will accept your apology in the foreseeable future.
ofcourse there are exceptions Lendl, Djokovic and other. But the british loser lost 3 times.
Here's some more data for you to mull over - every loser who lost their first 3 slam finals ended up winning a slam. Every single one.
Murray is a loser, 3 slam finals not even a set.
But THREE slam finals! That's TWO more than anybody else ranked #5 and below have ever made and THREE more than any other player on the tour ranked #10 and below with the exception of the slam veterans Roddick, Ferrero and Hewitt who are all now on the point of retiring! That's SOME loser!!!
Sorry mum! Loser Murray becomes first ever player to not win a set in THREE Grand Slam finals after defeat in Melbourne
So who are those and how many sets did they not win?
Tell us when you win a Challenger in Europe or "earn some extra cash"Murray will win Wimbledon.