If the final is Djoko v. Murray, then I don't care to watch it

Anyone else not care to watch a real-life game of pong?


pong.gif
 

mistik

Hall of Fame
You have a point. I wont watch it either.Ultimate choker Murray against Lance.I have better plans on Sunday.
 

Ico

Hall of Fame
I concur. I'll catch some highlights but that's it. I'd wake up at 3 AM for Fed (or Delpo or Tsonga).
 

underground

G.O.A.T.
It will be so boring. It's just 2nd after Djokovic-Nadal. Gosh even I sometimes rather watch a bit of loopy FHs and lefty play, rather than 2 players who literally play the same game with 1 slightly better than the other.
 
N

nikdom

Guest
I'll watch it. But if they get into defensive, retriever mode, I'll probably go back to bed. Will definitely read a match recap.
 

kishnabe

Talk Tennis Guru
I will watch it with some grass to take the pain away.

If it was Federer in the final...then no need.
 

stoo

Semi-Pro
I'll get up to watch it. But as soon as the bordem factor goes up, I'll be drifting back off to zzzzzzz on the couch. A couple of single malts might make it more interesting from the start.
 

90's Clay

Banned
Murray will play Nole a lot harder then Fed will and he has a better chance to beat Nole.

Fed hasn't managed even ONE set off of Nole at the AO in 5 years. Fed can't hang with Nole o this surface. Murray can though
 
K

Kilco

Guest
I would love a djoko murray final. With their ridiculous defence and consistent power from the baseline, it will be a treat. Like a boxing match :) Long rallies, burning lungs, a real physical grind with some serious fight from both players.
 

Warmaster

Hall of Fame
I'll go with plan B:

1) record
2) start watching when they've played for 1-2 hours
3) skip time between points
4) finish just in time to see the last games live

It worked for the Djokovic-Nadal matches!
 

Mike Sams

G.O.A.T.
Seems like most people on here are fans of players and not fans of the sport. Anybody who isn't going to watch Djokovic/Murray in the final (if Murray gets through) is not a real fan of tennis.:)
Especially after that awesome AO 2012 semifinal match!
 

ctoth666

Banned
I can honestly say that this will be the first major final that I will not watch since I've started watching tennis religiously in 2004. And, sadly, it's because I simply do not care about the result, and I am not interested in watching Murray and Djokovic play a best-of-five match. I'm not really interested in either player's game or personality, tbh. I'd much rather watch Federer play Djokovic, even if it's not that competitive...
 

mariecon

Hall of Fame
I won't watch either. I'll pvr it in case something controversial happens and then I can take a peek but I don't care for either player so I won't watch.:cry:
 

ctoth666

Banned
You would find this boring?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpQ9v-0hUPM

Why do you follow tennis?

It's not that it isn't high quality tennis. In fact, it has nothing to do with it. For me, it boils down to two things:

-A lack of contrast or diversity between the players.
-Predictability. Not so much the result, but the rallies themselves.

It's like when I watch pornography. It could be a great scene with a beautiful woman and fantastic camera work, but sometimes it get's old, and that's why compilations can be a much better viewing experience. Some of the clips might be terrible, but it's the variety that maintains my interest.
 

zagor

Bionic Poster
Not my absolute favourite match-up on tour (due to the combination of both of them having such amazing court coverage on HC and playing high % tennis) but If I'm able you bet your *** I'll watch it, the drama/not knowing who will win will be enough for me (maybe I'm shallow but that's how I feel, if the match has great drama it's entertaining for me).
 

mattennis

Hall of Fame
It's not that it isn't high quality tennis. In fact, it has nothing to do with it. For me, it boils down to two things:

-A lack of contrast or diversity between the players.
-Predictability. Not so much the result, but the rallies themselves.

It's like when I watch pornography. It could be a great scene with a beautiful woman and fantastic camera work, but sometimes it get's old, and that's why compilations can be a much better viewing experience. Some of the clips might be terrible, but it's the variety that maintains my interest.

Beautiful analogy. I concur.
 

Legend of Borg

G.O.A.T.
I'll watch it, but I will miss the shotmaking of Fed when the match inevitably shifts into a "who will retrieve the most balls" mode.
 

Fedex

Legend
Yeah

Actually I'm not really that interested in knowing more. Thanks anyway.

You ask the question you get the answer.

About 1500 years ago the Celtic Picts merged with Celtic Scots and a couple hundred years later merged with the Viking Norse.
That in a nutshell are the Scots.
In the USA, give it a 1000 years when the Spanish, British, Blacks, Chinese, other Europeans etc have merged into one big melting pot and you will have the race of Americans whatever that will look like.
 

THUNDERVOLLEY

G.O.A.T.
OP: if Murray and Djokovic are in the final, it will be fascinating to see them fight to draw "first blood" at the majors, and see how it forces the rest of the big four to scramble to take him down (always a bad strategy--if one player is the focus).

I won't even watch the highlights.

someone is bitter....
 

Fedex

Legend
OP: if Murray and Djokovic are in the final, it will be fascinating to see them fight to draw "first blood" at the majors...

Of course it will be fascinating and a fantastic match. Unfortunately the two current best players on the planet also happen to be the two most unpopular.
 
N

nikdom

Guest
Of course it will be fascinating and a fantastic match. Unfortunately the two current best players on the planet also happen to be the two most unpopular.

That would be current #1 and #2 right? Novak and Federer. Even in the last official tournament where Murray and Federer were in, Federer went further.

I don't understand this logic. Murray fans are ready to pull rank where the RLA night match issue came up (#3 not getting a single match on show court), but for saying two current best players somehow #2 doesn't count??
 
Top