Nadal is the only top 5 player that Murray doesn't have an edge over now

N

nikdom

Guest
Nadal is the only top 5 player not playing right now. That's the only relevant fact.
 

veroniquem

Bionic Poster
She means because he had to play Saturday, Sunday and Monday. But Saturday was just 2 sets and Sunday was 2 easy sets - and it's Djokovic we're talking about.

Apparently he can play five hours and 5 sets then come back and play another 5 sets and win, but he can't play 4 sets over 2 days then play another 5 sets and win.



The important thing is the day off in between. (He didn't play 2 5 setters back to back at AO, he had a day to recover). When your opponent is as good as Murray is and has a normal schedule and you need to come out 3 days in a row, of course it's gonna make a difference. At that level, everything matters. I'm sure it mattered for Murray at USO 2008.
 

Clarky21

Banned
She means because he had to play Saturday, Sunday and Monday. But Saturday was just 2 sets and Sunday was 2 easy sets - and it's Djokovic we're talking about.

Apparently he can play five hours and 5 sets then come back and play another 5 sets and win, but he can't play 4 sets over 2 days then play another 5 sets and win.

Ok, thanks. If Lance can play endlessly for hours and hours and then come back fresh as a daisy, I think he can manage to play a few short sets over a few days time. Didn't he have that 4 hour semi against Andy in Rome in 2011 only come back the very next day showing no signs of ever having played that match, beating Nadal in the final?
 

Fedex

Legend
Playing in the middle of a tornado isn't really Djoko's forte. FFS, he lost a set to Ferrer in those conditions and we all know how good Ferrer is against Djoko.

I'm not going to say Djokovic would've won if the weather conditions were perfect. But this, like Fed's win in the Madrid Ice Rink, has a bit of an asterisk on it.

I can come up with excuses for every one of Murray's slam final losses - bad scheduling, tough draws, exhaustion, injuries etc.
Does that mean there's an asterisk against every player who beat Murray in a slam final?
The fact is Murray wasn't good or strong enough to cope with it and his rivals were because, for instance, they maybe played better earlier rounds and deserved to be fresher for the final.
Apologies for the name calling btw but the wind stuff really gets on my goat and, if you've been watching Murray's progress over the years which I doubt you have from your comments then you'll know Murray's success is down to world class play on a par with the very best. Not down to the wind.
 

THE FIGHTER

Hall of Fame
Yep, the best the rest of the field can manage is a +1 match differential against Nadal (1-0 and 6-5). Barely a lead. I HOPE Nadal faces Rosol and Davydenko in 2013. :p

yes! sweet redemption. davydenko lost in straights i think in the Australian Open. rafa will dismantle him :p
 

tennisaddict

Bionic Poster
The semis against Berdych had horrendous wind conditions. Why is everyone making it as though there was wind in the finals ?

Novak was clearly the better player at the end of the 4th set and Murray was mentally out. At that juncture, Novak didnt have any more gas in him. If he had a better schedule, he definitely would have won. No doubt.

Compensates for the lucky forehands that he had against Fed in USO 2010 and 2011 SF.

When you have a long career, it will all even out. (except for Murray's easy draws)
 

Fedex

Legend
I'm saying that in a match with weather like that, luck becomes a bigger factor.

The luck that saw Murray lose a set to Berdych in the USO semi final because the wind blew his hat off a winning shot on break point.
 
D

Deleted member 307496

Guest
ferrer is tough. he has been a staple in the top 5 for years. the next best thing to the top 4. if it wasnt for rafa he would have multiple french opens by now.
No he wouldn't, Federer can beat him easily.
 

TheF1Bob

Banned
m1C1E.gif

Using my gif now are we? LOL jokes, this is the dedicated to NSK and to NSK only. 8)

No, you 'fail HARD'. I'm not NSK (I believe his actual username is nadal_slam_king, show some respect) and I'm certainly not talking to myself in this thread. Then again, you are a part of the most paranoid tennis forum in existence, Talk Tennis. :p

m1C1E.gif
 
Last edited:

The_Order

G.O.A.T.
If Djoker/Fed were to get Rosol'd every now and then on clay that H2H advantage wouldn't be there.

Not their fault if Humbalito fails to get to them outside of clay.

Nadal has a better record vs Murray on clay, grass and indoor hc. They're even in outdoor hc.

He also has a better record vs Novak on clay and grass.

He also has a better record vs Federer on clay and outdoor hc.

More importantly he leads h2h against all of them at majors.
 

THE FIGHTER

Hall of Fame
Nadal has a better record vs Murray on clay, grass and indoor hc. They're even in outdoor hc.

He also has a better record vs Novak on clay and grass.

He also has a better record vs Federer on clay and outdoor hc.

More importantly he leads h2h against all of them at majors.

nadal is better than all three of them. lets face it. the stats are astounding. GOAT
 

Seventeen

Rookie
Murray KILLED Federer at the Olympics 6-2 6-1 6-4.
Murray OUT-CLUTCHED Djokovic at the US Open 7-6 7-5 2-6 3-6 6-2
Murray OUT-CLUTCHED Ferrer at Wimbledon 6-7 7-6 6-4 7-6

Whereas Murray lost to Nadal at their last 3 slam meetings:
2011 US Open Nadal 6-4 6-2 3-6 6-2
2011 Wimbledon 5-7 6-2 6-2 6-4
2011 Roland Garros 6-4 7-5 6-4

Nadal has also defeated Federer, Djokovic and Ferrer at their last slam meetings.

And so begins the Murray-Nadal era, 2013-2016.

Roland Garros is a forgone conclusion, with Nadal winning 6-8 clay events between now and June. Wimbledon and the US Open should be closer.

_45677846_rafand_getty_282.jpg


Troll_TE.jpg
 
I would not overrate the olympics win. yes, the olympics are extremely important for fed and he was certainly at least as motivated as he is in a slam but he had the disadvantage of being tired due to that long DP match. If he was fresh that match would have been a lot closer.

I expect a very hard match today. fed might not be in his prime anymore but he is in very good shape for his age and hitting the ball very well. that will not be easy for murray, especially if fed has a good first serve percentage.
 

Soulie

Rookie
Nadal has a better record vs Murray on clay, grass and indoor hc. They're even in outdoor hc.

He also has a better record vs Novak on clay and grass.

He also has a better record vs Federer on clay and outdoor hc.

More importantly he leads h2h against all of them at majors.

Let's not forget Nadal leads 3-2 on slam H2H with Fed even without the roland garros matches
 
Top