Lilguy1456
Semi-Pro
At 3 bucks, I gotta wonder how good this string is. Is it a great poly, or just great for being only $3? Is polylon at 3 dollars a better deal than Cyclone at 8?
TW's summary really does "sum it up" IMO-----
"Gosen Polylon is a good old-fashioned polyester string. Unlike the emerging crop of high tech co-polys, it isn't loaded with extravagant chemical additives. Nor does it have a cadre of professional players who swear by it. What it does have, according to our playtesters, is remarkable control, especially at the highest swing speeds. It also has tremendous spin potential. This is partly because Polylon's response is so predictable and low powered that it enables big hitters to attack the ball at extreme upward angles. As for comfort, this string surprised our team by offering a feel commonly found in more elastic (and more expensive) co-polys. Of course this doesn't mean that Polylon is for everybody. It's a firm string designed for advanced players. Ultimately, though, once you factor in the price, which is less than a couple of vibration dampeners, Gosen Polylon is one of the all time best options for big hitters on a budget."
http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/reviews/GPLY17/GPLY17Review.html
I appreciate the cut and paste. Clearly, I saw what TW had to say prior to coming to the forums. I come to the forums to get a view from people not in the business of selling the product i'm inquiring about...
It's one of the worst in terms of tension maintenance though.
Yes the pattern shows it's dead by design. Zero elasticity after it deformed under tension. Now you can cut in the middle and see very little movement, like if you cut electric wire.Im starting to believe
I think this string (Polylon 16) loses the lion' share of its tension almost immediately.
Examples using Raquet Tune----
Strung at 59, an hour or less later it reads 48
Strung at 65, an hour or less later it reads 48
Strung at 67, an hour or less later it reads 48.
In all of these cases, not a ball was struck.
Hmmmmm.......me thinks me sees a pattern here!
Yes the pattern shows it's dead by design. Zero elasticity after it deformed under tension. Now you can cut in the middle and see very little movement, like if you cut electric wire.
That will be a good test. If I cut these out before they break, Ill take a note of how much the string moves after being cut.
Im starting to believe
I think this string (Polylon 16) loses the lion' share of its tension almost immediately.
Examples using Raquet Tune----
Strung at 59, an hour or less later it reads 48
Strung at 65, an hour or less later it reads 48
Strung at 67, an hour or less later it reads 48.
In all of these cases, not a ball was struck.
Hmmmmm.......me thinks me sees a pattern here!
For those of you posting racquettune numbers here you say what you strung it at but not what it read immediately after stringing. Unless you give that, the number 4 hours later (or however much time) is pretty meaningless.
I have actually measured within a few minutes after stringing and the values are pretty much the same as after an hour. So, either the string instantaneously loses tension, or the RT reading and the string machine reading just don't match. It doesn't matter much to me either way as all I care about is a relative number, if you know what I mean.
Relative to how the stringbed feels as I play with it and how the RT number changes with time.Relative... to what? That was gmatheis' point, to a certain degree. The second data point is important if you want to compare it to anything.
Im starting to believe
I think this string (Polylon 16) loses the lion' share of its tension almost immediately.
Examples using Raquet Tune----
Strung at 59, an hour or less later it reads 48
Strung at 65, an hour or less later it reads 48
Strung at 67, an hour or less later it reads 48.
In all of these cases, not a ball was struck.
Hmmmmm.......me thinks me sees a pattern here!
I dont take the strung tension to be a numerical match with the RT tension, but just to be used as a tool to judge drop. Who know....maybe it does drop 15+ lb in a hour!
My desire to string higher has been to experiment with tension maintenance (such that if I start higher, it will presumably play longer in the desired range). For me, I seem to like this string in the 99S frame when it reads 44-45. This string will play a decent amount of time in that range, as in my RT measurements at least, it is a slow drop down from the initial big drop. I think I got ~12 sets out of the last stringbed before it was ~40 on RT, which starts to feel a little too mushy to me.
I did a crude pseudo elasticity testing with this string today.
Before applying any load to the string, I mearked off 36" on the string (my apologies to the metric folks). I applied a 52 lb load to the string and then watched for elongation.
Immediately after the load was applied, the string had stretched to 37 3/8" and 15 minutes later was very slightly longer at 37 1/2". Readings taken at 30 and 45 minutes after load applocation showed the same 37 1/2" length.
I removed the 52 lb load at the 45 minute mark and watched to see how much of the elongation of the string was permanent. It was almost all of it, as the string slightly shortened back to 37 3/8".
I then applied the 52 lb load again, and the string once again measured 37 1/2".
High level results seem to indicate that in this test the string elongated ~4% and once set, it does not approach any sort of return back to its original length.
Has anyone else ever made a similar assessment of other polys? Or nat gut? Id be curious if gut would return almost to its original length?
Out of curiosity, how are you applying the load? Is it just a weight hanging by the string with a fixed end on the other side? 3 feet is a long length to be tensioning on a stringing machine. Just curious what your setup looks like.
ok so i got this guy breaking black code in a day. polylon should last him 2 days hopefully?
This string is one of the harder ones to break IMO. Another poster compared it to "electric wire", and that may not be far off!
This string is one of the harder ones to break IMO. Another poster compared it to "electric wire", and that may not be far off!
Yes....1.30 is the Polylon I use.yea its pretty darn stiff. tough to string too. this kid is breaking it every day!
so today i told him to switch to 1.30 next time
I bought a pack of 17 natural and 17 ice based on customer reviews.
Now I wonder if I should bother to try it.
Yes....1.30 is the Polylon I use.
He breaks it in a day? I wouldn't think DelPotro with that big sweeping TTTTWWWWWHACK could break this stuff that fast.....it is literally like wire! Even shanked balls don't seem to faze it.
It was crap four years ago--still crap today.
this string offers great control and unique durability for sure.if you can bring your own power, its quite nice actually, full bed, 17 guage.