Federer at almost 33 won the same number of matches at the 2014 French Open as Sampras - a Tier 2 Great - won in his last 5 French Opens combined at the ages of 27-31.
Federer at almost 33 won the same number of matches at the 2014 French Open as Sampras - a Tier 2 Great - won in his last 5 French Opens combined at the ages of 27-31.
And Ken Rosewall, at age 33 at the 1968 French Open, won more than twice as many matches (7) as Federer won this year at the French. I guess that makes Fed something like a Tier 3 Great.
And Ken Rosewall, at age 33 at the 1968 French Open, won more than twice as many matches (7) as Federer won this year at the French. I guess that makes Fed something like a Tier 3 Great.
I don't know if you're trolling but it's silly to compare player's one specific year(rather than entire career) to draw a conclusion. Rosewall also has 1 FO title in the open era and plus most people place Roger higher than Roswall in all time greatest clay courter.
Federer at almost 33 won the same number of matches at the 2014 French Open as Sampras - a Tier 2 Great - won in his last 5 French Opens combined at the ages of 27-31.
I don't know if you're trolling but it's silly to compare player's one specific year(rather than entire career) to draw a conclusion. Rosewall also has 1 FO title in the open era and plus most people place Roger higher than Roswall in all time greatest clay courter.
Dumbest comment I have heard in awhile. Nadal is clearly the greatest player ever at the French Open, as well as, the greatest player at one grand slam in history. End of story.