G A S
Hall of Fame
like he's only trying to get attention? could be, yeah.He's just a poser, why is everybody taking him so seriously?
like he's only trying to get attention? could be, yeah.He's just a poser, why is everybody taking him so seriously?
he seems to go further in tournaments named Wimbledon than the mighty GOAT.He's just a poser, why is everybody taking him so seriously?
Brah..are you serious? You said that you are a Roddick fan on the last page? You now look like a massive hypocrite. I have yet to see Kyrgios disrespect umpires and opponents the way Roddick did.What is a lot more?
Disrespecting umpires and opponents is not bad.
Disrespecting the sport is.
A rant is fine. A sanctimonious tirade admonishing a very young athlete? R i d i c u l o u s !Seriously, you wanna be 7 edgy 9 us? Ok, go there and put your nose up in the air.
You wanna say you don't fear anyone? Ok, do it.
You wanna discuss with every umpire in a match of yours? Ok
But saying he doesn't like tennis?
That he likes basketball better?
THAT HE STILL DREAMS OF BEING ON THE NBA?
Dude, honestly, go **** yourself
Agassi said that he hated Tennis, but he had several traumas with it. And even with all of it, he gave his life to the sport.
Kyrgios is just a spoiled piece of **** that had everything from Tennis Australia from the beginning, and now can make a living out of Tennis.
Saying things like that are extremely disrespectful to tennis fans, to the ones that play against him, and the thousands that gave everything to play tennis but didn't have the money or the talent to be successful.
I really hope he never accomplishes anything stellar in his career and eventually drops to -140 for him to learn to respect the sport that allows him to make a living and to be a little arrogant pretentious *********.
Kyrgios is trying to find that free-flowing mode by hurrying his serving etc. He plays his best in that free-flow mental state. He is NOT a fighter though. I think he will struggle a lot in the future with trying to survive on these off-days.Kyrgios just lost two points on Gasquet's serve, by not trying at all. Didn't move his feet and disinterestedly wafted at the ball. The entire crowd booed. The commentators struggled to explain it. They said "you can be box office, you can be a star, you can be a character, but you can't tank"
Disgusting behaviour.
I'd like to hear some Kyrgios apologists explain this!
Im with Trash. Kyrgios is really annoying to watch and I hope he fizzles. Its different from Mac and Connors etc. Those guys were arguing line calls...basically arguing for points so I can understand them getting upset and directing anger at officials. Federer, Nadal, Novak would all be throwing fits without Hawkeye deciding line calls. What is Kyrgios getting upset about? Linesmen reporting he is using foul language?...
Kyrgios just lost two points on Gasquet's serve, by not trying at all. Didn't move his feet and disinterestedly wafted at the ball. The entire crowd booed. The commentators struggled to explain it. They said "you can be box office, you can be a star, you can be a character, but you can't tank"
I'm sure Nick been playing tennis all of his life and for hours and hours every day. He was pushed by his parents and at a young 20, tennis has been his life for probably 15 years. I can easily see a man watching LeBron playing ball on tv and thinking, "that looks like way more fun. A team sport, all that showmanship, and no 7 day weeks in the sun, alone hitting forehand after forehand."
You have to enjoy something a fair amount though to succeed like he is. His showmanship and playing the crowd is just his way of emulating the basketball players he likes to watch.
Yes.'its different with Mac and Connors'
... oh, you mean they were caucasion
Disrespecting umpires (you've put it mildly in JMac's case) and opponents is BAD. Its part of disrespecting the Sport. Obviously, the game is an aggregate of players, officials, sponsors, organizers, in game behaviour , social behaviour (nowadays) , politics and finally, the sheer physical aspects.
Whatever the JMacs, Connors and Agassi did then, did not detract from their prowess as players. So they are still respected. As I said, NK is still starting out. It will be a different conversation if he majors into the top-5, stays there with multiple titles. Or he can be that proverbial flash in the pan.
Yes.
Everything is about race.
Whenever one criticizes someone who is not white, it's only because of their race.
Any and all criticism of someone who happens to be non-white, non-male, or non-hetero is discrimination.
Also, on an unrelated note, spelling, grammar, and punctuation are all things.
I ask only that you recognize this.
Kyrgios' poor attitude has nothing to do with race, absolutely nothing.how about you recognize this is a message board, a discussion forum. the point being discussion! not punctuation and proper prose construction!
spelling and grammar queens like yourself represent the biggest waste of space and characters on any forum.
obviously you got my point, hence your myopic, apathetic, and sarcastic reply. i suggest you look and try your best to decipher (although i realize this is hard for someone who lacks empathy and never deals with wholesale discrimination themselves) racial/near racists posts/phrases in this and other threads about N.K.! such as "he's a wanna-be 'soul brother'...rap-NBA scene", or thug, brown **** on my shoe, and many others.
open your eyes and pay attention to context as much as you seemingly do to commas
Tell us how you really feel.Seriously, you wanna be 7 edgy 9 us? Ok, go there and put your nose up in the air.
You wanna say you don't fear anyone? Ok, do it.
You wanna discuss with every umpire in a match of yours? Ok
But saying he doesn't like tennis?
That he likes basketball better?
THAT HE STILL DREAMS OF BEING ON THE NBA?
Dude, honestly, go **** yourself
Agassi said that he hated Tennis, but he had several traumas with it. And even with all of it, he gave his life to the sport.
Kyrgios is just a spoiled piece of **** that had everything from Tennis Australia from the beginning, and now can make a living out of Tennis.
Saying things like that are extremely disrespectful to tennis fans, to the ones that play against him, and the thousands that gave everything to play tennis but didn't have the money or the talent to be successful.
I really hope he never accomplishes anything stellar in his career and eventually drops to -140 for him to learn to respect the sport that allows him to make a living and to be a little arrogant pretentious *********.
LULzhow about you recognize this is a message board, a discussion forum. the point being discussion! not punctuation and proper prose construction!
spelling and grammar queens like yourself represent the biggest waste of space and characters on any forum.
obviously you got my point, hence your myopic, apathetic, and sarcastic reply. i suggest you look and try your best to decipher (although i realize this is hard for someone who lacks empathy and never deals with wholesale discrimination themselves) racial/near racists posts/phrases in this and other threads about N.K.! such as "he's a wanna-be 'soul brother'...rap-NBA scene", or thug, brown **** on my shoe, and many others.
open your eyes and pay attention to context as much as you seemingly do to commas
Kyrgios' poor attitude has nothing to do with race, absolutely nothing.
No-one here is suggesting it does either, I have read the thread over.
Grammar and context are not mutually exclusive.how about you recognize this is a message board, a discussion forum. the point being discussion! not punctuation and proper prose construction!
spelling and grammar queens like yourself represent the biggest waste of space and characters on any forum.
obviously you got my point, hence your myopic, apathetic, and sarcastic reply. i suggest you look and try your best to decipher (although i realize this is hard for someone who lacks empathy and never deals with wholesale discrimination themselves) racial/near racists posts/phrases in this and other threads about N.K.! such as "he's a wanna-be 'soul brother'...rap-NBA scene", or thug, brown **** on my shoe, and many others.
open your eyes and pay attention to context as much as you seemingly do to commas
I forgive McEnroe and Connors (to an extent) because they were champions who proved themselves and weren't just a brats with no achievements.you continue to be blind or play dumb!
and i'm not referring to N.K's 'poor attitude', but the reaction to it from some vs reactions to players with similar if not worse attitudes/actions throughout their careers!
If you don’t know, ask somebody
But I think they were, overall, good for the sport, as they contributed more than they harmed.If it's a question of behaviour that you are worried about you just can't excuse it based on success.
But I think they were, overall, good for the sport, as they contributed more than they harmed.
Kyrgios hasn't done any contributing yet.
That is true.even accepting your premise, that its ok for them because they were succesful, you haven't given N.K. enough time to show his success.
actually he's already shown alot of promise compared to his top peers. he's defeated former #1s and made it to the 1/4s of slams as a teen.
you continue to be blind or play dumb!
and i'm not referring to N.K's 'poor attitude', but the reaction to it from some vs reactions to players with similar if not worse attitudes/actions throughout their careers!
If you don’t know, ask somebody
I love the fact that she stuck to wooden frames. It shows her passion for the history of the game. Lovely woman.Kyrgios is the pride of Malaysia, but all commentators ever comment on is his Greek and Australian origin. Pure racism.
Kyrgios has a wonderful and beautiful mother.
Take a moment to grant her your blessings.
The pride of Malaysia is the future of Asian tennis. Adje.
That's not at all consistent with your previous arguments. In such a case, Kyrgios' could start beating women, but if he won 18 slams he would be "good for the sport". Your problem is with his behaviour, and you sidestep the fact that such logic would lead one to indict the champions of attitude in McEnroe and Connors.That is true.
I've said before though that if he starts contributing more (winning), and maybe matures a little too, which will probably happen, then I will be able to tolerate him more.
It's all about overall contribution.
Perhaps, if you like rabies....Kyrgios is the most infectious player to watch on tour.
....and syphilis......Perhaps, if you like rabies....
#GrannyIlluminati
I don't think being a villain is bad. I just think he doesn't deserve to be there if he does not love tennis AND would rather play basketballPeople need to realize that villains make the sport more exciting to watch. For example,, today, most of us were on the edge of our seats during the whole match, and his defeat was thoroughly enjoyable. And then the fun extended into our post-match discussions, which consisted of gleefully crapping on him. When was the last time we had such a good time watching a 4th round match?
Yes, criminal assault is entirely on the same level as swearing.That's not at all consistent with your previous arguments. In such a case, Kyrgios' could start beating women, but if he won 18 slams he would be "good for the sport". Your problem is with his behaviour, and you sidestep the fact that such logic would lead one to indict the champions of attitude in McEnroe and Connors.
An extreme example to illustrate how you are conveniently sidestepping implications of your own arguments. You are saying Kyrgios has bad behaviour, and this makes him a bad player and bad for the sport. However, you then realize the folly of labelling the most important tennis player in history as a player who was bad for the sport so then conveniently add some random caveat that you can have bad behaviour but as long as you win you are good for the sport. That's rather forced and illogical.Yes, criminal assault is entirely on the same level as swearing.
I see what you're getting at, but I have consistently maintained that my chief objection to cockiness and poor behaviour is when it's done by players who haven't "earned" the right to any latitude.An extreme example to illustrate how you are conveniently sidestepping implications of your own arguments. You are saying Kyrgios has bad behaviour, and this makes him a bad player and bad for the sport. However, you then realize the folly of labelling the most important tennis player in history as a player who was bad for the sport so then conveniently add some random caveat that you can have bad behaviour but as long as you win you are good for the sport. That's rather forced and illogical.
No one "earns the right" to behave better or worse - that's completely ridiculous. Those who watched tennis prior to the 21st century know that Connors was angry long before he was successful. And McEnroe was McEnroe long before he was a champion. That didn't change when they won titles. So was Connors bad for the sport then became good for the sport? Nonsense. His personality made him good for the sport, just as Kyrgios' personality is good for the sport now. It's a kick in the balls to the fans who have only ever known this generation of players. When there's a new player on the block that can actually evoke emotions from fans whatever they may be, most will always go into anaphylactic shock as to how someone would dare disturb them from their day-dream. But Kyrgios isn't especially controversial or especially rude. He's nothing new at all. We just haven't seen him for a while.I see what you're getting at, but I have consistently maintained that my chief objection to cockiness and poor behaviour is when it's done by players who haven't "earned" the right to any latitude.
No player should behave badly, but yeah, where players have otherwise contributed enormously to the sport, I am willing to cut them some slack.
This may become true for Nick in the future too, but right now, he is arrogant with no justification.