Kyrgios is a disgrace to Tennis

Serve&Bash

Semi-Pro
What is a lot more?
Disrespecting umpires and opponents is not bad.
Disrespecting the sport is.
Brah..are you serious? You said that you are a Roddick fan on the last page? You now look like a massive hypocrite. I have yet to see Kyrgios disrespect umpires and opponents the way Roddick did.

If Kyrgios starts yelling "I'm giving you a warning!" and "FU*CK YOU!!!" at umpires, I will reconsider this. I have seen Roddick do both, unfortunately.
 

Russeljones

Talk Tennis Guru
Seriously, you wanna be 7 edgy 9 us? Ok, go there and put your nose up in the air.
You wanna say you don't fear anyone? Ok, do it.
You wanna discuss with every umpire in a match of yours? Ok

But saying he doesn't like tennis?
That he likes basketball better?
THAT HE STILL DREAMS OF BEING ON THE NBA?

Dude, honestly, go **** yourself

Agassi said that he hated Tennis, but he had several traumas with it. And even with all of it, he gave his life to the sport.

Kyrgios is just a spoiled piece of **** that had everything from Tennis Australia from the beginning, and now can make a living out of Tennis.

Saying things like that are extremely disrespectful to tennis fans, to the ones that play against him, and the thousands that gave everything to play tennis but didn't have the money or the talent to be successful.

I really hope he never accomplishes anything stellar in his career and eventually drops to -140 for him to learn to respect the sport that allows him to make a living and to be a little arrogant pretentious *********.
A rant is fine. A sanctimonious tirade admonishing a very young athlete? R i d i c u l o u s !
 

accidental

Hall of Fame
I don't hold it against him for saying that. Most of us don't end up doing what we dream about for a living, but end up doing something we are good at and can make money from.

With him he probably wasn't anywhere near as good at basketball as he was at tennis, despite basketball being what he loves. For all his arrogance it doesn't seem like he doesn't work hard to me.

Pretty sure a few players have made similar statements in the past. Youzhny comes to mind as one
 

junior74

Talk Tennis Guru
The disgrace for tennis is all the young talents that CAN'T win against top players. Kyrgios has shown that he can! His manners are annoying, but they will take a more mature form soon enough, and he has already established himself as a real contender against any player.
 

The Green Mile

Bionic Poster
Sounds like a bit of jealousy from you, OP. That he whinges about not liking tennis, dreams of playing NBA, but still makes a very great living off tennis. Not sure how it's disrespectful to not really like the sport you play, while interested in another.

But seeing the emotions Kyrgios had in the Raonic match, makes he believe he really wants it. I'm not to sure if he actually believes he dislikes tennis. His on court rants are another thing entirely. Entertaining and great to watch, I want him at the top of the game.
 
K

King Fed WW

Guest
What he is doing right now is a disgrace to tennis and Wimbledon.

Just disgusting to not make any attempt to return a serve.

If it is only temporary and actually a tactical tank then I'll give him a pass.
 

falstaff78

Hall of Fame
Kyrgios just lost two points on Gasquet's serve, by not trying at all. Didn't move his feet and disinterestedly wafted at the ball. The entire crowd booed. The commentators struggled to explain it. They said "you can be box office, you can be a star, you can be a character, but you can't tank"

Disgusting behaviour.

I'd like to hear some Kyrgios apologists explain this!
 
Kyrgios just lost two points on Gasquet's serve, by not trying at all. Didn't move his feet and disinterestedly wafted at the ball. The entire crowd booed. The commentators struggled to explain it. They said "you can be box office, you can be a star, you can be a character, but you can't tank"

Disgusting behaviour.

I'd like to hear some Kyrgios apologists explain this!
Kyrgios is trying to find that free-flowing mode by hurrying his serving etc. He plays his best in that free-flow mental state. He is NOT a fighter though. I think he will struggle a lot in the future with trying to survive on these off-days.
 

DRII

G.O.A.T.
Im with Trash. Kyrgios is really annoying to watch and I hope he fizzles. Its different from Mac and Connors etc. Those guys were arguing line calls...basically arguing for points so I can understand them getting upset and directing anger at officials. Federer, Nadal, Novak would all be throwing fits without Hawkeye deciding line calls. What is Kyrgios getting upset about? Linesmen reporting he is using foul language?...

'its different with Mac and Connors'

... oh, you mean they were caucasion :rolleyes:
 

mightyrick

Legend
Kyrgios just lost two points on Gasquet's serve, by not trying at all. Didn't move his feet and disinterestedly wafted at the ball. The entire crowd booed. The commentators struggled to explain it. They said "you can be box office, you can be a star, you can be a character, but you can't tank"

I've seen Fognini do this on several occastions. I've seen Monfils do it before. It's not great sportsmanship, but honestly, who cares? I personally don't like a lot of Kyrgios' antics, but I do like his raw, unfiltered expression. He isn't a bad person, he's just young, unfiltered, and expressive.

People can say what they want about the guy, but he is at least genuine.
 

The_Racketeer

Professional
I'm sure Nick been playing tennis all of his life and for hours and hours every day. He was pushed by his parents and at a young 20, tennis has been his life for probably 15 years. I can easily see a man watching LeBron playing ball on tv and thinking, "that looks like way more fun. A team sport, all that showmanship, and no 7 day weeks in the sun, alone hitting forehand after forehand."
You have to enjoy something a fair amount though to succeed like he is. His showmanship and playing the crowd is just his way of emulating the basketball players he likes to watch.
 

mightyrick

Legend
I'm sure Nick been playing tennis all of his life and for hours and hours every day. He was pushed by his parents and at a young 20, tennis has been his life for probably 15 years. I can easily see a man watching LeBron playing ball on tv and thinking, "that looks like way more fun. A team sport, all that showmanship, and no 7 day weeks in the sun, alone hitting forehand after forehand."
You have to enjoy something a fair amount though to succeed like he is. His showmanship and playing the crowd is just his way of emulating the basketball players he likes to watch.

I think this is actually pretty accurate. Although, James and any other NBA player also spends hours every day playing basketball, shooting jumpshots, running drills... over and over again. In the end, you're just putting a ball in a hoop. But the nice thing about basketball is that on court personalities are allowed to run free. In fact, it is one of the greatest things about the sport. Since it isn't a sport that comes from England, it doesn't have the snooty, aristocratic heritage. It is a sport from the common people.

Regardless, Kyrgios' tanking on points would not give him success in any sport -- let alone basketball. In basketball, the swings between momentum come so fast that you cannot afford to have an emotional breakdown where you tank and don't even bother playing defense or covering the floor. In tennis it loses you a couple of points. In basketball, that can easily lose you the game.
 
D

Deleted member 688153

Guest
'its different with Mac and Connors'

... oh, you mean they were caucasion :rolleyes:
Yes.
Everything is about race.

Whenever one criticizes someone who is not white, it's only because of their race.
Any and all criticism of someone who happens to be non-white, non-male, or non-hetero is discrimination.

Also, on an unrelated note, spelling, grammar, and punctuation are all things.
I ask only that you recognize this.
 

JonC

Banned
He is petulant spoiled brat - but that blonde streak in his hair is just fabulous don't you think guys?
 

JonC

Banned
Disrespecting umpires (you've put it mildly in JMac's case) and opponents is BAD. Its part of disrespecting the Sport. Obviously, the game is an aggregate of players, officials, sponsors, organizers, in game behaviour , social behaviour (nowadays) , politics and finally, the sheer physical aspects.
Whatever the JMacs, Connors and Agassi did then, did not detract from their prowess as players. So they are still respected. As I said, NK is still starting out. It will be a different conversation if he majors into the top-5, stays there with multiple titles. Or he can be that proverbial flash in the pan.


No, not trying on the court is disrespect - he's a wanna-be soul-brother who wants to be in the rap-NBA scene. I hope he leaves tennis.
 

DRII

G.O.A.T.
Yes.
Everything is about race.

Whenever one criticizes someone who is not white, it's only because of their race.
Any and all criticism of someone who happens to be non-white, non-male, or non-hetero is discrimination.

Also, on an unrelated note, spelling, grammar, and punctuation are all things.
I ask only that you recognize this.

how about you recognize this is a message board, a discussion forum. the point being discussion! not punctuation and proper prose construction!

spelling and grammar queens like yourself represent the biggest waste of space and characters on any forum.

obviously you got my point, hence your myopic, apathetic, and sarcastic reply. i suggest you look and try your best to decipher (although i realize this is hard for someone who lacks empathy and never deals with wholesale discrimination themselves) racial/near racists posts/phrases in this and other threads about N.K.! such as "he's a wanna-be 'soul brother'...rap-NBA scene", or thug, brown **** on my shoe, and many others.

open your eyes and pay attention to context as much as you seemingly do to commas :rolleyes:
 
LOL, this thread just shows up the real truth of many individuals. They are filled with HATE, they spread out HATE all around them, most all the energy they give out is HATE, and they make the society full of HATE. What a disgrace, for the whole of human race!
 
D

Deleted member 688153

Guest
how about you recognize this is a message board, a discussion forum. the point being discussion! not punctuation and proper prose construction!

spelling and grammar queens like yourself represent the biggest waste of space and characters on any forum.

obviously you got my point, hence your myopic, apathetic, and sarcastic reply. i suggest you look and try your best to decipher (although i realize this is hard for someone who lacks empathy and never deals with wholesale discrimination themselves) racial/near racists posts/phrases in this and other threads about N.K.! such as "he's a wanna-be 'soul brother'...rap-NBA scene", or thug, brown **** on my shoe, and many others.

open your eyes and pay attention to context as much as you seemingly do to commas :rolleyes:
Kyrgios' poor attitude has nothing to do with race, absolutely nothing.
No-one here is suggesting it does either, I have read the thread over.
 

hoodjem

G.O.A.T.
Seriously, you wanna be 7 edgy 9 us? Ok, go there and put your nose up in the air.
You wanna say you don't fear anyone? Ok, do it.
You wanna discuss with every umpire in a match of yours? Ok

But saying he doesn't like tennis?
That he likes basketball better?
THAT HE STILL DREAMS OF BEING ON THE NBA?

Dude, honestly, go **** yourself

Agassi said that he hated Tennis, but he had several traumas with it. And even with all of it, he gave his life to the sport.

Kyrgios is just a spoiled piece of **** that had everything from Tennis Australia from the beginning, and now can make a living out of Tennis.

Saying things like that are extremely disrespectful to tennis fans, to the ones that play against him, and the thousands that gave everything to play tennis but didn't have the money or the talent to be successful.

I really hope he never accomplishes anything stellar in his career and eventually drops to -140 for him to learn to respect the sport that allows him to make a living and to be a little arrogant pretentious *********.
Tell us how you really feel.

*******
 

ArcspacE

G.O.A.T.
how about you recognize this is a message board, a discussion forum. the point being discussion! not punctuation and proper prose construction!

spelling and grammar queens like yourself represent the biggest waste of space and characters on any forum.

obviously you got my point, hence your myopic, apathetic, and sarcastic reply. i suggest you look and try your best to decipher (although i realize this is hard for someone who lacks empathy and never deals with wholesale discrimination themselves) racial/near racists posts/phrases in this and other threads about N.K.! such as "he's a wanna-be 'soul brother'...rap-NBA scene", or thug, brown **** on my shoe, and many others.

open your eyes and pay attention to context as much as you seemingly do to commas :rolleyes:
LULz
 

DRII

G.O.A.T.
Kyrgios' poor attitude has nothing to do with race, absolutely nothing.
No-one here is suggesting it does either, I have read the thread over.

you continue to be blind or play dumb!

and i'm not referring to N.K's 'poor attitude', but the reaction to it from some vs reactions to players with similar if not worse attitudes/actions throughout their careers!

If you don’t know, ask somebody :rolleyes:
 

hoodjem

G.O.A.T.
how about you recognize this is a message board, a discussion forum. the point being discussion! not punctuation and proper prose construction!

spelling and grammar queens like yourself represent the biggest waste of space and characters on any forum.

obviously you got my point, hence your myopic, apathetic, and sarcastic reply. i suggest you look and try your best to decipher (although i realize this is hard for someone who lacks empathy and never deals with wholesale discrimination themselves) racial/near racists posts/phrases in this and other threads about N.K.! such as "he's a wanna-be 'soul brother'...rap-NBA scene", or thug, brown **** on my shoe, and many others.

open your eyes and pay attention to context as much as you seemingly do to commas :rolleyes:
Grammar and context are not mutually exclusive.
 
D

Deleted member 688153

Guest
you continue to be blind or play dumb!

and i'm not referring to N.K's 'poor attitude', but the reaction to it from some vs reactions to players with similar if not worse attitudes/actions throughout their careers!

If you don’t know, ask somebody :rolleyes:
I forgive McEnroe and Connors (to an extent) because they were champions who proved themselves and weren't just a brats with no achievements.
Not because they are white.

Like, how does that even come into it?

I'm pretty sure the same people who dislike Kyrgios also dislike Tomic.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
If it's a question of behaviour that you are worried about you just can't excuse it based on success.
 
D

Deleted member 688153

Guest
If it's a question of behaviour that you are worried about you just can't excuse it based on success.
But I think they were, overall, good for the sport, as they contributed more than they harmed.
Kyrgios hasn't done any contributing yet.
 

DRII

G.O.A.T.
But I think they were, overall, good for the sport, as they contributed more than they harmed.
Kyrgios hasn't done any contributing yet.

even accepting your premise, that its ok for them because they were succesful, you haven't given N.K. enough time to show his success.

actually he's already shown alot of promise compared to his top peers. he's defeated former #1s and made it to the 1/4s of slams as a teen.
 
D

Deleted member 688153

Guest
even accepting your premise, that its ok for them because they were succesful, you haven't given N.K. enough time to show his success.

actually he's already shown alot of promise compared to his top peers. he's defeated former #1s and made it to the 1/4s of slams as a teen.
That is true.
I've said before though that if he starts contributing more (winning), and maybe matures a little too, which will probably happen, then I will be able to tolerate him more.
It's all about overall contribution.
 

Wilander Fan

Hall of Fame
you continue to be blind or play dumb!

and i'm not referring to N.K's 'poor attitude', but the reaction to it from some vs reactions to players with similar if not worse attitudes/actions throughout their careers!

If you don’t know, ask somebody :rolleyes:

Connors, McEnroe etc...they were arguing line calls because there was no Hawkeye back then. You can still see now in every match there are some bad calls but they get challenged. Also, both those particular guys went for lines so it was a good tactic for them to keep the umpire and the lines people at attention.

Really, there is no excuse for getting into it with the chair anymore. Maybe those rare calls whether to replay a point or give a point...and Nadal and his time violations...but that is it. Krgios arguing with every chair umpire is idiotic.
 

HouTex

Rookie
He's not bad for tennis any more than Nastase, McEnroe, Connors and others were bad for tennis. McEnroe acted like a complete spoiled brat with no manners or class early in his career. Now he is respected.
 

Gtech

Rookie
I would not compare McEnroe or Connors to this to thug wannabe. This guy Kyrgios is a massive tool.
 
N

Nathaniel_Near

Guest
Kyrgios is the pride of Malaysia, but all commentators ever comment on is his Greek and Australian origin. Pure racism.

Kyrgios has a wonderful and beautiful mother.

Take a moment to grant her your blessings.

733715-6d06c952-01e3-11e4-aaf7-dc6e5517e581.jpg


The pride of Malaysia is the future of Asian tennis. Adje.
 

Russeljones

Talk Tennis Guru
Kyrgios is the pride of Malaysia, but all commentators ever comment on is his Greek and Australian origin. Pure racism.

Kyrgios has a wonderful and beautiful mother.

Take a moment to grant her your blessings.

733715-6d06c952-01e3-11e4-aaf7-dc6e5517e581.jpg


The pride of Malaysia is the future of Asian tennis. Adje.
I love the fact that she stuck to wooden frames. It shows her passion for the history of the game. Lovely woman.
 

Inanimate_object

Hall of Fame
That is true.
I've said before though that if he starts contributing more (winning), and maybe matures a little too, which will probably happen, then I will be able to tolerate him more.
It's all about overall contribution.
That's not at all consistent with your previous arguments. In such a case, Kyrgios' could start beating women, but if he won 18 slams he would be "good for the sport". Your problem is with his behaviour, and you sidestep the fact that such logic would lead one to indict the champions of attitude in McEnroe and Connors.
 

FD3S

Hall of Fame
I laughed out loud when I saw those couple of points. I mean, tanking in tennis (whether it be strategic or not) is a thing, and not likely to go away soon. I think that's the first time I've seen someone be so blatant about it though; normally there's an effort made to at least camouflage it, but that's not the way Kyrgios rolls.

Shine on, you controversial diamond.
 

Rubens

Hall of Fame
People need to realize that villains make the sport more exciting to watch. For example,
, today, most of us were on the edge of our seats during the whole match, and his defeat was thoroughly enjoyable. And then the fun extended into our post-match discussions, which consisted of gleefully crapping on him. When was the last time we had such a good time watching a 4th round match?
 
People need to realize that villains make the sport more exciting to watch. For example,
, today, most of us were on the edge of our seats during the whole match, and his defeat was thoroughly enjoyable. And then the fun extended into our post-match discussions, which consisted of gleefully crapping on him. When was the last time we had such a good time watching a 4th round match?
I don't think being a villain is bad. I just think he doesn't deserve to be there if he does not love tennis AND would rather play basketball
 
D

Deleted member 688153

Guest
That's not at all consistent with your previous arguments. In such a case, Kyrgios' could start beating women, but if he won 18 slams he would be "good for the sport". Your problem is with his behaviour, and you sidestep the fact that such logic would lead one to indict the champions of attitude in McEnroe and Connors.
Yes, criminal assault is entirely on the same level as swearing.
 

Inanimate_object

Hall of Fame
Yes, criminal assault is entirely on the same level as swearing.
An extreme example to illustrate how you are conveniently sidestepping implications of your own arguments. You are saying Kyrgios has bad behaviour, and this makes him a bad player and bad for the sport. However, you then realize the folly of labelling the most important tennis player in history as a player who was bad for the sport so then conveniently add some random caveat that you can have bad behaviour but as long as you win you are good for the sport. That's rather forced and illogical.
 

cjs

Professional
Krgios is a disgrace. An embarrassment to my country.

I hope they fine him the 20k for tanking yesterday.

His parents failed. Someone needs to teach him how to act like a man instead of a spoiled man-child.
 
D

Deleted member 688153

Guest
An extreme example to illustrate how you are conveniently sidestepping implications of your own arguments. You are saying Kyrgios has bad behaviour, and this makes him a bad player and bad for the sport. However, you then realize the folly of labelling the most important tennis player in history as a player who was bad for the sport so then conveniently add some random caveat that you can have bad behaviour but as long as you win you are good for the sport. That's rather forced and illogical.
I see what you're getting at, but I have consistently maintained that my chief objection to cockiness and poor behaviour is when it's done by players who haven't "earned" the right to any latitude.
No player should behave badly, but yeah, where players have otherwise contributed enormously to the sport, I am willing to cut them some slack.
This may become true for Nick in the future too, but right now, he is arrogant with no justification.
 

Inanimate_object

Hall of Fame
I see what you're getting at, but I have consistently maintained that my chief objection to cockiness and poor behaviour is when it's done by players who haven't "earned" the right to any latitude.
No player should behave badly, but yeah, where players have otherwise contributed enormously to the sport, I am willing to cut them some slack.
This may become true for Nick in the future too, but right now, he is arrogant with no justification.
No one "earns the right" to behave better or worse - that's completely ridiculous. Those who watched tennis prior to the 21st century know that Connors was angry long before he was successful. And McEnroe was McEnroe long before he was a champion. That didn't change when they won titles. So was Connors bad for the sport then became good for the sport? Nonsense. His personality made him good for the sport, just as Kyrgios' personality is good for the sport now. It's a kick in the balls to the fans who have only ever known this generation of players. When there's a new player on the block that can actually evoke emotions from fans whatever they may be, most will always go into anaphylactic shock as to how someone would dare disturb them from their day-dream. But Kyrgios isn't especially controversial or especially rude. He's nothing new at all. We just haven't seen him for a while.
 
Top