travlerajm
Talk Tennis Guru
I tend to like racquets with stiffer upper hoops. A little give in the throat is ok.The feel is modernly classic because the top of the hoop is stiffer than the ones in the old classics.
I tend to like racquets with stiffer upper hoops. A little give in the throat is ok.The feel is modernly classic because the top of the hoop is stiffer than the ones in the old classics.
+1I tend to like racquets with stiffer upper hoops. A little give in the throat is ok.
The feel is modernly classic because the top of the hoop is stiffer than the ones in the old classics.
Cool, but the good thing about the top CAP is that split down the middle. Makes it easy to pull up a few grommets and add some lead. I just want the balance a little more HH and the SW in the mid 330s.
Precisely. That’s one of the reasons why I never got along with the PT280. The upper hoop was too soft robbing it of power unless you hit the ball closer to the throat.That sounds good to me. The classics are very tough to play with due to that soft upper hoop combined with the lower power and weight. But I still remember the feel of the sweetspot when hitting a big FH right on the middle. Probably one of the best feels of all time for me.
Cool, but the good thing about the top CAP is that split down the middle. Makes it easy to pull up a few grommets and add some lead. I just want the balance a little more HH and the SW in the mid 330s.
It's not capped.
J
not full cap down the side of the racquet but the design is similar.
So jelly! Very cool
That’s the hologram sticker logo on the butt-cap.
I know, I’m amazed it remained flawless after all the years. Compared to my PT630 or Bumblebee which have seen a lot of tennis action, the frame has barely hit a ball.That’s the hologram sticker logo on the butt-cap.
The hologram stickers do remain in good condition. It’s the nature of the black ink to wear away on the othersI know, I’m amazed it remained flawless after all the years. Compared to my PT630 or Bumblebee which have seen a lot of tennis action, the frame has barely hit a ball.
I might be in the minority but I actually liked the Touch Mid. Playtested it for TW here. I am not a Prestige purist, in fact I grew up on Babolats and more modern frames. For me it was a great fun racquet that was stable, precise and had good feedback. Very different from older Prestiges but not in a bad way, for me atleast.Damz. I pulled the trigger on the previous model (I couldn't resist the price point at $68 per); and it got a slight nod (although not over the new version (360+)) I just love traditional sticks like this. Thinking, if I can gel with this one a bit (string, lead, etc), I'll look forward to pulling the trigger on the new 360+ version. Time to get fit and be aggressive
Damz. I pulled the trigger on the previous model (I couldn't resist the price point at $68 per); and it got a slight nod (although not over the new version (360+)) I just love traditional sticks like this. Thinking, if I can gel with this one a bit (string, lead, etc), I'll look forward to pulling the trigger on the new 360+ version. Time to get fit and be aggressive
Excellent review. I grew up on old Head (even before prestiges), Ultra and Wilson. Perhaps if you hadn't started with non Babs/modern frames - you might have been more comfortable playing with these full time - as you background is certainly there. I do play more - and love old school doubles. And really glad it was solid on serves - where I could probably be more aggressive. Also want to mix in more S&V. Thanks!
As a side note, I've always wanted the newer P Pros to work, but they're just lacking pop and seem vague.
Great racquet, and a real MID!Not the Prestige Mid this thread was intended to talk about, but just picked up this beauty for $25.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Chopped liver compared to the 360+ prestige mid.Not the Prestige Mid this thread was intended to talk about, but just picked up this beauty for $25.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jelly. Nice Nice pick up. I played with the IG mid (the one after this one); and at the time was grinding too much to be effective with it. Marylin Monroe-esqueNot the Prestige Mid this thread was intended to talk about, but just picked up this beauty for $25.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A good mid is a complete weapon in doubles. Not that I play much of that, but even just coming to the net with the P93, I felt way more confident and executed volleys out in front a lot more often.
I think if you play singles with a mid, you have to follow your big shots to the net. That has to be your MO, but it's a great way to play, especially if you are dealing with a pusher.
MG -> YT -> IGYT -> later mids which I never triedJelly. Nice Nice pick up. I played with the IG mid (the one after this one); and at the time was grinding too much to be effective with it. Marylin Monroe-esque
I might be in the minority but I actually liked the Touch Mid. Playtested it for TW here. I am not a Prestige purist, in fact I grew up on Babolats and more modern frames. For me it was a great fun racquet that was stable, precise and had good feedback. Very different from older Prestiges but not in a bad way, for me atleast.
MG -> YT -> IGYT -> later mids which I never tried
all before the latest super prestige mid!
Your review and Jo11y’s are why I enjoyed the touch mid a ton...enough to buy up a 360+ as well.
I find this rev pro mold to be really interesting and I love the attention it gets now that it has good weight to it. I can even say that I saw pretty advanced juniors here in TX swinging the touch mid coming from blades and aeros. We’ve also seen a handful of pro dubs players using the mold as well.
I’m too dumb about equipment to know how this frame can be as user friendly, modern-performing, and classic feeling at the same time...but I love it when I’m not confused by why a counter puncher like me is playing well with it.
Your review and Jo11y’s are why I enjoyed the touch mid a ton...enough to buy up a 360+ as well.
I find this rev pro mold to be really interesting and I love the attention it gets now that it has good weight to it. I can even say that I saw pretty advanced juniors here in TX swinging the touch mid coming from blades and aeros. We’ve also seen a handful of pro dubs players using the mold as well.
I’m too dumb about equipment to know how this frame can be as user friendly, modern-performing, and classic feeling at the same time...but I love it when I’m not confused by why a counter puncher like me is playing well with it.
This is really promising to read. Do you mod yours at all?
What's vibration frequency? Lol, I haven't looked at these boards in ages it seems.I noticed today that the vibration frequency of the touch mid is 145 and this new one is 135. This is probably why people are loving the feel of this new one so much. That said, the last one was a pretty nice frame. My coach uses it now. He kind of likes it, but he says it feels a little stiff compared to his old prestige’s. I’m trying to convince him to get a 360+ that we can hit with this weekend.
I should also give you credit for why I had an Aero+ in the very same bag as the touch mids.
I had a bit lead at 3 &9 on the touch mid, but that was it...no mods on the 360+ yet because it’s really effective for me stock. I’m a 35 yr old 4.5, pretty scrawny/weak (can’t blame COVID), so I’ll need to put in work to earn any extra weight. In fact, today was the first day I played with the 360+ mid in a 1.5/2 hour match in the heat and the weight was tough for me. Somehow I was able to slice and roll my way to a three set win. I simply don’t have an aggressive game, unless you consider drop shots aggressive, but this stick & mold can work well for crafty players.
What's vibration frequency? Lol, I haven't looked at these boards in ages it seems.
I noticed today that the vibration frequency of the touch mid is 145 and this new one is 135. This is probably why people are loving the feel of this new one so much. That said, the last one was a pretty nice frame. My coach uses it now. He kind of likes it, but he says it feels a little stiff compared to his old prestige’s. I’m trying to convince him to get a 360+ that we can hit with this weekend.
Sorcery, I tell you. Sorcery!It seems counterintuitive that the new 360+ has lower vibration frequency, whatever that's useful for, when it has slightly higher stiffness than the GT and the weight between both racquets is nearly equal. Must be the magic 360+ fairy dust that makes it better.
It seems counterintuitive that the new 360+ has lower vibration frequency, whatever that's useful for, when it has slightly higher stiffness than the GT and the weight between both racquets is nearly equal. Must be the magic 360+ fairy dust that makes it better.
It correlates directly to arm comfort in my experience. I started using that chart years ago and it has been a big help in finding comfortable frames with good feel. Its a better indicator than just focusing on RA.
And yeah, it does seem counter-intuitive, but that's kind of the point : RA is not a great way to measure frame comfort. If you don't believe me, listen to the new TW podcast on it.
The touch mid is pretty nice until you try the g360+ mid which adds more power. Both pretty solid racquets and if you looking for a little more oomph go with g360+ mid.I noticed today that the vibration frequency of the touch mid is 145 and this new one is 135. This is probably why people are loving the feel of this new one so much. That said, the last one was a pretty nice frame. My coach uses it now. He kind of likes it, but he says it feels a little stiff compared to his old prestige’s. I’m trying to convince him to get a 360+ that we can hit with this weekend.
Oh I believe you, I've never cared too much about RA numbers. Some of my favorite racquets are ones with high RA ratings (PSC, n90, k90), but consequently they have vibe frequencies in the mid-high 140's.
The touch mid is pretty nice until you try the g360+ mid which adds more power. Both pretty solid racquets and if you looking for a little more oomph go with g360+ mid.
Yeah, thats one of the things that grabbed me about this new mid - low vibration but the RA is higher, which means we can lead with more edge on the ball and still get lots of power. The really soft frames feel so good but they are not very friendly to a strong SW grip. you will probably have a similar experience with the prior version.
How is the power for you compared to the Blade? If I can hit even bigger with the Prestige, that would be crazy.
If you using the same swing, I don't think it has the same amount of power. However because the beam width is thinner and smaller frame size, you can take the racquet further back without losing timing and generating more power that way.
If you are on push off the court and need to arm the shot, the blade still is the better racquet.
Overall one of the best mid out there because the sweet spot is consistent through the string bed and delivers more power than pro staff 90 while being less stiff.
I would keep one in my bag just for fun but it won't replace my Blade.
Yeah, I think adding a couple grams of lead at the tip may help me get the 2 frames closer.I will have to see how it goes.
I’ll also be interested in your feedback on serving with this mid...and w/ the lead. Hope you get out with it soon.