You beat me to this.I'm not sure.
Murray has the huge disadvantage of never getting to return vs Murray.
Other than that, Djokovic.
Imagine posting this, every single time, every single time without context, while everyone knows how dumb it is to look at without context. Like seriously how did you pass the Turing test?The answer is here
Leaderboard | ATP Tour | Tennis
Statistical measures of the best-performing players in three key categories in men's professional tennis.www.atptour.com
ATP Leaderboard of ROS of all time
ATP Leaderboard of ROS last 52 weeks
Q. Who is the best returner now or of all time.Imagine posting this, every single time, every single time without context, while everyone knows how dumb it is to look at without context. Like seriously how did you pass the Turing test?
Wrong. Novak is 6th of all time.Novak
Is clay not a surface? There are far more opportunities to move up the board on hardcourts which form the majority of the tour. Clay or no clay, what's Novak\s excuse for being 6th of all time?Novaxx, Nishikori
Lol at the top ROS Leaderboard where all the clay rats are.
Which other ATP statistic is out of context? As long as posters appear uninformed, I will continue to post the facts.Imagine posting this, every single time, every single time without context, while everyone knows how dumb it is to look at without context. Like seriously how did you pass the Turing test?
So, tell me where the boundary is behind the baseline for return of serve. Standing far away from the baseline obviously works. Just watch how many players are now copying Rafa's ROS position including Djokovic.Nadal shouldn't be in the poll. A guy returning from the stands with the goal to just get the ball back in play is not part of this conversation.
I think it's close between Djovak and Murray, Agassi is there as well. But overall it's Djoko. Ferrer is very underrated as well.
Nadal is teaching the likes of Thiem, Zverev, Tsitsipas, Medvedev and the rest very well with when it comes to returning from the stands. It has proven very effective for the NextGen so far.
As the question suggests.
Agassi due to the court conditions he played intoAs the question suggests.
Nadal shouldn't be in the poll. A guy returning from the stands with the goal to just get the ball back in play is not part of this conversation.
I think it's close between Djovak and Murray, Agassi is there aswell. But overall it's Djoko. Ferrer is very underrated aswell.
Agassi by some distance.As the question suggests.
Just no.Wrong. Novak is 6th of all time.
Yup, who can forget that beast Guillermo Perez Roldan and his monstrous return.
Connors was very good also, he was considered the best before Agassi came onto the scene. But yes, Djokovic is overall the greatest runner of all time as it stands now.
Yeah basically all those in the poll are skilled aggressive returners and there isn't much difference between them either. But I personally would choose Djokos. Maybe cause I've seen him play the most but the stuff he is capable off on the return is mindboggling. Just latest against Medvedev. You can just tell how huge of a weapon it is.
If someone was compiling a quiz show and one of the questions was 'who is the best returner of serve in men's tennis', they would go to the the official ATP leaderboard for the answer not to a tennis forum for opinions from fans.Just no.
Hold on. If clay is that easy why can't all players capitalise on it. It's not as if only those players who do well on clay play on it. Everyone plays on clay.The problem with return stats based on points/games won is that they don't tell you only about the return. The top clay court players typically have inflated return stats because it's an easier surface for them to return on.
The point is we are not on a quiz show and we are on a tennis forum where opinion is everything.If someone was compiling a quiz show and one of the questions was 'who is the best returner of serve in men's tennis', they would go to the the official ATP leaderboard for the answer not to a tennis forum for opinions from fans.
You need to be a game show host to answer that question.What is a "return rating" and how is it calculated?
So you disregard the facts.The point is we are not on a quiz show and we are on a tennis forum where opinion is everything.
Btw - I rest my case....
No way Murray's return is anything close to Djokovic's.Nadal shouldn't be in the poll. A guy returning from the stands with the goal to just get the ball back in play is not part of this conversation.
I think it's close between Djovak and Murray, Agassi is there aswell. But overall it's Djoko. Ferrer is very underrated aswell.
At this point, you're no better than Lew.
At this point, you're no better than Lew.
At this point, you're no better than Lew.
At this point, you're no better than Lew.
Obviously winning matches on clay isn't easy. But returning serves on clay courts is undeniably the easiest of the 3 surfaces. So the more opportunities you get to play clay matches, the better your return numbers are going to look. And likely the worse your serving numbers will too.Hold on. If clay is that easy why can't all players capitalise on it. It's not as if only those players who do well on clay play on it. Everyone plays on clay.