Unprecedented, no?4 top 10 wins in row
I’m rooting for Khachanov tonight because I’m risk averse! I fear typical Nadalian brutality on Tsitsipas’ 1HBH tomorrow.Can’t believe you’re seriously asking this question here...
Even if Tsitsi doesn't win, his Toronto run has impressed me more than any of Zverev's masters titles.Probably not. You have to be unseeded for it to be possible, need 5 top 10 players to be in your part of the draw, need them to all win through. Then there's the small matter of actually beating them.
Don’t underestimate Khachanov. His game can give Nadal problems.Congrats to Tsitsi on a great win and campaign.
Nadal will most likely beat him tomorrow, but anyone but Anderson in the final.
I doubt it.
Probably not. You have to be unseeded for it to be possible, need 5 top 10 players to be in your part of the draw, need them to all win through. Then there's the small matter of actually beating them.
I am sure both of them will, but now I want to see Masters #33.Don’t worry, Khachanov will have many more chances to win Masters.
I'll believe it when I see it.Don’t underestimate Khachanov. His game can give Nadal problems.
Stephanos - after he shook Anderson’s hand he went straight to the court to cheer when Anderson went to shake the ump’s handWho didn't shake the ups and
defeated: Djokovic, Murray ,Dimitrov & Fedr, Then won the titleTsonga did the same in 2014 and also in Toronto
i'm a bit confused by this question... why would anyone want the nadal to win a point let alone a match ?So do you guys want Nadal in the final or Khachanov?
Even if Tsitsi doesn't win, his Toronto run has impressed me more than any of Zverev's masters titles.
ABACongrats to Tsitsi on a great win and campaign.
Nadal will most likely beat him tomorrow, but anyone but Anderson in the final.
I don’t think it was a deliberate slight though. He was just in the moment. I hope I’m not wrong about that.Stephanos - after he shook Anderson’s hand he went straight to the court to cheer when Anderson went to shake the ump’s hand
Let's not call him Tipsy. Reminds me of Tipsarevic who in his dreams would not achieve what Tsits has done.Well Tipsy beat both of the recent Wimbledon finalists and Zverev so that is more impressive than beating a broke back Federer, erratic Thiem, and famished Djokovic.
32 is plenty and I am humbled to have achieved so much, no?I am sure both of them will, but now I want to see Masters #33.
He doesn't have a plan B. Can't keep firing the whole match and when you cease playing your best then Nadal strikes. See the Cilic match. I would like to be proven wrong but I think Bull has this.Don’t underestimate Khachanov. His game can give Nadal problems.
Even if Tsitsi doesn't win, his Toronto run has impressed me more than any of Zverev's masters titles.
did he really said that?"He cracked at the end", says Tsitsi on Anderson
"I knew he would break down", Tsitsi on Djokovic
some will like this, they will be remembered by others
Why do you think I was so put off by the Cilic choke last night. Khachanov and Tsitsipas have gotten drubbed by Nadal. Absolutely clobbered. Neither has taken so much as a set.Y'all will so turn your backs on Tsitsi if he gets butchered by the Bull tomorrow.
I expect that to happen.Y'all will so turn your backs on Tsitsi if he gets butchered by the Bull tomorrow.
Because Nadal is...Why do you think I was so put off by the Cilic choke last night. Khachanov and Tsitsipas have gotten drubbed by Nadal. Absolutely clobbered. Neither have taken so much as a set.
Hyeon Chung hasn't done much really.Okay so there are two players I like from the next gen.
Hyeon Chung- Baby shadow Djoker.
Tsits- Baby Shadow Fedr.
Cause he’s the best and the cutesti'm a bit confused by this question... why would anyone want the nadal to win a point let alone a match ?
He’s under 25 so no way.@Meles you are done with hyping Z?
You can just say Thiem. He's always erratic.Well Tipsy beat both of the recent Wimbledon finalists and Zverev so that is more impressive than beating a broke back Federer, erratic Thiem, and famished Djokovic.
Hyeon Chung hasn't done much really.
Let's hope he's got some classic moves queued up. Lawnmower, shopping cart, running man, you name it. But these youngsters have got a thing or two to learn.
I know but I like him. He can play some real good tennis. His serve is poor but I love his groundstrokes and flexibility.Hyeon Chung hasn't done much really.
Rafa’s lessons are free of charge.Let's hope he's got some classic moves queued up. Lawnmower, shopping cart, running man, you name it. But these youngsters have got a thing or two to learn.
@Hitman
Zoning servebots have historically given Nadal problems. Khachanov is actually more than a servebot. He has a powerful ground game and, like Tsitsipas, just needs experience and increased confidence to become even more dangerous.He doesn't have a plan B. Can't keep firing the whole match and when you cease playing your best then Nadal strikes. See the Cilic match. I would like to be proven wrong but I think Bull has this.
But you are an old soul.He’s under 25 so no way.
Maybe will hype me as well since I’m under 25.
He has mostly played terrible this year. I can't remember one good match of his.