Big Berr not winning jack now that his BH has been exposed.AO: Djokovic
FO: Thiem
WC: Berrettini
USO: Medvedev
AO: Nadal
RG: Nadal
W: Nadal
USO: Juan Martin
9 months to work on it. You're not wrong though, that he's got a huge weakness to work on.Big Berr not winning jack now that his BH has been exposed.
Don't get me wrong, I love how that would play out, but Tsits winning WC?AO: Federer
RG: Thiem
W: Tsitsipas
USO: Medvedev
Don't get me wrong, I love how that would play out, but Tsits winning WC?
Don't get me wrong, I love how that would play out, but Tsits winning WC?
Lol what?!
Lol what?!
It's so weird that federer was actually closer to winning RG than he was at USO.You deserve us using Feder everywhere if he wins RG20. I seriously thought he had a chance in the SF against Nadl (and I'd favor him over Thiem in the finals), but then that friggin sandstorm happened.
Wishful thinking, especially about djoker.AO: Djokovic
F: Nadal
W: Djokovic
US: Djokovic
Wishful thinking, especially about djoker.
It's so weird that federer was actually closer to winning RG than he was at USO.
But maybe it's because he used all of his variety & natural surfaces reward that much better.
And strom or no storm, fed was not taking down rafa on clay BO5 at this advanced age. He had his best chances at Rome 2006, RG 2006/2007/2011 & blew them.
If not for strom, nadal would've won in 4/5 sets anyways with fed snatching one tiebreaker or 6-4 set with servebotting.
Don't get me wrong but Djokovic is not looking that much convincing after Australian open final. yes he has raised his level when needed, but the drop is significantWishful thinking that the world number 1 and holder of 2 of the current slams will win the slams that he is the favourite to win?
Fed had chances only in set 1&2, set no.3 was a completely wipeout because he gave up.I get what you're saying, but I think you're overestimating Nadl's form for RG19. Feder was in better form (beat a really good Stan in the QF) than Nadl before the match. The sandstorm forced Feder into just putting the ball in play, yet he still had chances in all 3 sets (I think?). Nadl's game is naturally higher margin, so it was punished less in those conditions, and by extension, Feder's game would be rewarded more than Nadl's in normal conditions. At WB19, I actually thought Nadl's form was better than Feder's before their match, but Feder took him out convincingly in 4. So, I think Nadl dodged one there with the help of the sandstorm conditions at RG19.
AO-Fed
FO- Thiem
W-Fed
US- Med
AO: Federer
RG: Thiem
W: Federer
USO: Medvedev
AO: Djokovic
RG: Nadal
Wim: Nadal
USO: Nadal
He lost only to Fedovic in Slams this year, which is also a new feat for him at 33 yo. With some decent luck, all is possible. He keeps getting into position with his new found consistency and it paid off already.If this happens, it will go down as Nadl's best year on tour considering he'll be 34yo .
AO: Murray
FO: Kyrgios
W: Fedr
USO: Murray
AO: Nadal
RG: Nadal
W: Nadal
USO: Juan Martin
AO: Nadal
FO: Nadal
WI: Djokovic
US: Nadal
HA HA HA, we're not talking about doublesAO: Murray
FO: Kyrgios
W: Fedr
USO: Murray
I mean yeah Lajovic is already waiting in the final.Ao- Medvedev
Rg- Rafa
Wimbledon- Djokovic
Uo- Rafa
That means either fred or djoko will lose to lajovic or worse next year again. Man some hard court greats they are.I mean yeah Lajovic is already waiting in the final.