Yea, definitely on the thicker end, but I like it way more than the stirrup style. Way more stable, and this is a lot faster to put on. I might just grab a pair of the Babolat SFX3 since I know those fit pretty well, and they're only $55 right now. Pretty insane deal. If Adidas is having as much trouble selling the Stycon as it seems then the price should drop further. I'm honestly pretty disappointed with how fast the sole is wearing out on my SCB.
Hi Slvr, I would recommend the SFX3 over the Stycon as far as fit with braces is concerned so you made the right move pulling trigger on SFX3. I am not a fan of the Stycon anyway and I have a pair of the regular original colorway, and the BOA version that came recently as well. You will have issue with the fit with braces with either version. And if you have feet on wider side, I wouldn't recommend Stycon in the first place.
As for the SFX3, I playtested those for TW and have also ended up buying a couple more pairs over the years. The price is great right now and while they aren't going to be more durable, they will have a better fit with your brace than Stycon. My feet like the fit too. Very comfortable shoe, no issues in any particular department except for maybe durability on outdoor courts.
For the sole durability on SCB, it is going to wear the same for Stycon. If you aren't satisfied with SCB sole durability, the Stycon isn't going to last any longer, honestly. I would be far more concerned with the fit and feel of Stycon if you are comfortable with SCB. Opposite end of spectrum, really.
I think it came as COVID came. The buzz wasn't the greatest, and more unfortunately, it seems the pros wearing something matters to most. If you read the most of the reviews here, it's a lot of 2nd hand info relayed and much of that is 'feeling' of dislike or negativity, vs actual flaws of the shoe. I suppose mentally it matters, just as it does for the pros, who can have shoes pretty much custom made for them to a point. But the negativity around this shoe by people who haven't tried it on a court extensively, is frankly astounding. I'm rotating 2 pairs of Stycon right now and stocked up on another 3, the original one is near worn out. 2.5 mths is pretty good.
Mostly agree about sole wearing out versus the SCB, but I am not sure about rest of the reasoning you gave for dislike around the Stycon.
Most of the Stycon criticism is fairly warranted and you will find the majority of reviews in this thread come from posters who have first hand experience with the shoe, including myself. It isn't second hand relayed info if posters tell you they have the shoe and they didn't like it, for whatever xyz reason. Before the lockdown I played pretty regularly with college players and have Stycon a good run as best as I could. Then you have the TW review as well which wasn't exactly spectacular where I think 3 of them gave a thumbs down.
Fact is the shoe comes with issues, specifically the touted
stability giving way to bulkiness and lack of maneuverability and lack of comfort etc due to the fit. How does one expect someone to wear the shoe
extensively if it is a bad fit to begin with? That is a design flaw and needs a tweak. If one out of 10 people aren't liking the constricting fit and feel, the shoe will obviously end up on sale, fast which happened in this case here. And also, small note: Stycon was released well before the Covid-19 situation. It was launched in early Jan and went on sale shortly after whereas atleast in the US, we didn't start worrying about lockdowns till mid March. Same time ATP Tour suspended. Stycon was on sale in Feb.
Now the BOA version is a recent release, sure. But given how unpopular regular Stycon was, I don't foresee BOA selling too well either regardless.