Agassi vs Nalbandian Backhand

Better Backhand

  • Agassi

    Votes: 42 59.2%
  • Nalbandian

    Votes: 29 40.8%

  • Total voters
    71

King No1e

G.O.A.T.
2 of the greatest backhands ever in our sport. Relentless precision vs effortless elegance. Who has the better BH?
 

sredna42

Hall of Fame
Watch highlights of their matches. Nalbandian generally got the better of the backhand to backhand exchanges and was much bolder in pulling the trigger down the line. Nalbandian was better down the line and his slice was superior.
This. What the hell are some people smoking here.
 

Dan007

Hall of Fame
As much of an Agassi fan I am, I gotta say Nalbandian had the best 2-hander ever, even better than Djoker's. Agassi and Djoker's is much more of a consistent shot that does not break down with no weaknesses but Nalbandian was just as solid off that wing but much more lethal. The angles and the down the line shot winners he would rip during mid rally effortlessly was something special.
 

gqnelly

Rookie
Agassi the more consistent but it was more of a set up shot than hitting out and out winners. Similar to Djokovic, Borg, etc. Nalbandian was a bit more offensive with it. Both were world class.
 

metsman

G.O.A.T.
Watch highlights of their matches. Nalbandian generally got the better of the backhand to backhand exchanges and was much bolder in pulling the trigger down the line. Nalbandian was better down the line and his slice was superior.
they only played 1 match...
 

travlerajm

Talk Tennis Guru
Andre was better on the return. So he gets the nod.

On the other hand, Andre was vulnerable to players who were not afraid to take the backhand dtl, as he would keep trying the go cross-court too predictably. I recall Coria burning him repeatedly on hard court circa 2003.
 

skaj

Legend
Andre was better on the return. So he gets the nod.

On the other hand, Andre was vulnerable to players who were not afraid to take the backhand dtl, as he would keep trying the go cross-court too predictably. I recall Coria burning him repeatedly on hard court circa 2003.

Nalbandian was great on the return, he is not behind Agassi there.
 

King No1e

G.O.A.T.
Just compare win %, height and ELO ratings.
s-l400.jpg
 

Druss

Hall of Fame
I don't see any conclusion to this debate as they are both very close. For me it's obvious who i'd say is better (though only slightly). Their BHs alongside Djokovic and Safin are top 5 OE BHs.
If I had to rank them, albeit we're splitting hairs:
1) Djokovic
2a) Safin
2b) Agassi
4) Nalby.
 

King No1e

G.O.A.T.
I don't see any conclusion to this debate as they are both very close. For me it's obvious who i'd say is better (though only slightly). Their BHs alongside Djokovic and Safin are top 5 OE BHs.
If I had to rank them, albeit we're splitting hairs:
1) Djokovic
2a) Safin
2b) Agassi
4) Nalby.
I'd put Connors up there too. He was the OG 2-hander and he did it like no other.
1. Djokovic
2. Agassi
3. Nalbandian
4. Connors
5. Safin
would be my personal list
 

am1899

Legend
There’s something about Djokovic’s 2HBH follow through that looks unnatural to my eye. No doubt it works for him, and his results speak for themselves.

The others mentioned in the thread are all excellent IMO - Safin, Nalbandian, Agassi, Connors. I would also add Nishikori as an honorable mention.
 

FD3S

Hall of Fame
AA for the day to day, Nalby when he was really in the zone could probably do more with that shot than anyone.
This is what I think too. Nalbandian could produce breathtaking angles/pace and change directions effortlessly and at will when he was on , but much like the rest of this game it could be erratic on occasion - only on occasion, mind. In contrast, Agassi's BH didn't quite rise to the same insane heights but its ground floor was never any lower than 'very good'. It simply wasn't going to cough up sloppy errors or short balls unless serious, consistent heat was coming at it, and even then you were going to have to move him around first.
 

JackGates

Legend
2 of the greatest backhands ever in our sport. Relentless precision vs effortless elegance. Who has the better BH?
A bit unfair to compare, because they aren't the same tier level in overall skills, so Agassi would probably find a way to win backhand exchanges due to other things. It's much fair to compare it with someone on the same level as Nalbandian like Davydenko, in this case Nalbandian is nr.1 in his goup of the skill level.
 

travlerajm

Talk Tennis Guru
Right, and Sampras was a better returner then both of them, he has 14.
He was a better server. But Andre wasn’t exactly known for serving. Given Andre played with a standard length OS, and Nalbandian used a 28” midplus, I give the serve edge to the guy with better leverage.
 

skaj

Legend
He was a better server. But Andre wasn’t exactly known for serving. Given Andre played with a standard length OS, and Nalbandian used a 28” midplus, I give the serve edge to the guy with better leverage.

What does this have to do with the topic?
 

am1899

Legend
Not as outstanding as the aforementioned, but I also admired the 2HBH’s of Kafelnikov, Rios, and Fish as well...
 

Sysyphus

Talk Tennis Guru
I'd say no player in tennis history has probably gotten as much sheer value out of their backhand as Andre Agassi. Maybe you could put Connors in there.
 

Zoid

Hall of Fame
for me there is a spectrum of offensive abilities to defensive and consistency.

Offensive/catching fire_____________________________________________________________________________Defensive/Consistent


......Nishikori..........Safin...........................Agassi...........................Djokovic................Murray...................Medvedev
..........Nalbandian.......Gulbis.............................Davydenko
............Benoit Paire



This was done hastily and makes no claims as to whose is the 'best'. It's my opinion and probably reflects a mindset/overall style of a player more so than their isolated backhand capabilities.

To be clear, if I had to select a backhand for myself (rank them) I would have to do so in the context of their overall game - eg. you can't separate Djok's amazing open-stance defensive end-range backhand from a regular backhand, it's all part of the same package. So for me I rank them as follows (I haven't included connors as I have not seen enough of him).

1 - Djok - this is pretty clear for me - day in day out the most rock solid backhand in history. An absorbing wall of rubber - can change direction on a whim, defuse offensive serves and shots, incredible end range, very handy drop shot disguise off this side too.

2 - Agassi - again - can't seperate it from his overall style of taking it early, taking time away, constant pressure. I can still remember watching him live v Schuettler at the AO and was amazed how much of his body he put into that shot on every ball. Crushed.

3 - Murray - let's remember that Murray has some of the all-time great results with clear holes in his game - poor second serve, non ATG forehand. His return of serve stats are off the charts, incredible anticipation. Great variety and feel off the backhand side, can really mix it up well. Obviously can inject pace too. Right up there and only a hair between him and Djok.

4 - Safin - No one before or since has wielded the Prestige like it was a spoon and crushed two'ies. Was the rock of his game when everything else could fall off shallow tracks. Two parts swashbuckling three parts Fort Knox.

5 - Nishikori - honestly I think massively under-rated. Probably the best of this era in terms of sheer ability to change direction, create angle, inject pace. Had a little more pop than Djoker's but less overall consistency and end range ability.

6 - Nalbandian - could easily be higher but I think of Bandicoot's 2'y similar to that of Nishikori. Both smaller guys who could really take it early and punch well above their weight. Great disguise and pace injection. Had the angle, feel, etc. Technically my favourite to model in terms of grip, take back efficiency.
 
Top