Over the next 6 years, someone is going to beat him. He barely won this year, and then lost to Murray at the US Open.
Again, Nadal THIS year alone, won RG far more convincingly than Djokovic won the AO. He lost ONE set because of rain, compared to Djokovic having to come back from 2 sets to 1 down vs Murray and a break down in the 5th against hard court mug, Nadal. He almost got beaten but a total hardcourt mug playing his worst muggiest tennis ever. Nadal has never ever had that much problems at RG except the one year he was beaten which is 3 years ago.
How exactly can Nadal be beaten at RG more easily than Djokovic at The AO when he hasn't been beaten there in 3 years, has one loss in 8 appearences and aside from that only one erson has taken him the distance? Djokovic doesn't come close at any point in his career.
Seriously, you're not even trying to troll in a clever way anymore :lol:
By the way, who was the dude who actually skipped the olympics?
But somehow when Nadal cruises to the RG title, he IS beatable? According to your logic, Nadal winning 60-58 in the 5th is still proving he is unbeatable, but even if he won 6-06-0 6-0 you would stillclaim he isn't.