What is is not necessarily good!
Even a person as certain about things as you must agree with that? No?
It's as good as it's good for fathers to do so. No more, no less.
What is is not necessarily good!
Even a person as certain about things as you must agree with that? No?
If I was Azarenka's brother that guys life would be a living hell.
Right, men and woman are really the same right?It's as good as it's good for fathers to do so. No more, no less.
I am not fully surprised it is inadequate for you!
Men and women are equally capable of parenting children.Right, men and woman are really the same right?
There is absolutely no difference between them!
Well, I suppose I never can tell what the future will bring, so in case of, thanks for the heartily good wishes!Good luck with looking after your future kids (as I am sure that you don't have any).
I think children need to be raised by both a mother and a father, and their combined capability will make this happen.Men and women are equally capable of parenting children.
You don't know s**t about me.You would make threads on online forums to berate him. That'll show him
Lol noMen and women are equally capable of parenting children.
Why does a mother that just had a baby travel the world to play tennis?
A mother needs to be home with her baby!
I think children need to be raised by both a mother and a father, and their combined capability will make this happen.
However I think the mother is more capable than the father when it comes to caring for babies.
Certainly some mothers are less capable, they could be on drugs, or dealing with a gambling or alcohol addiction, extreme career types, etc.Wrong. I've seen instances when fathers can be better/more capable than mothers in caring for babies.
This myth of mothers being better is perpetuated because oh well, they were not left with much choice and not too many fathers were willing to take on caring for babies. Women aren't born with any special skills in child care any more than men.
Certainly some mothers are less capable, they could be on drugs, or dealing with a gambling or alcohol addiction, extreme career types, etc.
Of course in those cases the father would have to do the best he can.
I disagree, they are!Women aren't born with any special skills in child care any more than men.
Yes I know, there are some women that are different, bless their hearts, something happened with their wiring, not their fault!There are completely sobre, non-drug addict, non "extreme career" type women who aren't wired to care of a child better than the father.
I disagree, they are!
How about you inform yourself about paternal versus maternal care in apes?
Well that substantive response sure knocked the wind out of me.Lol no
She's going to be such a bad mother!I am so going to laugh when Serena comes back after she gives birth.
Already looking forward to some people's poasts.
Newpball, babies do nothing but eat, sleep and have their diapers changed. The only woman-specific skill involved is breastfeeding, for couples that forego formula.
No, women do not have the magic touch when it comes to diaper changing. Or bottle feeding. Or getting the kid to sleep. So Azarenka is no less entitled to resume her career than Federer or Djokovic were.
Well that substantive response sure knocked the wind out of me.
Newpball, babies do nothing but eat, sleep and have their diapers changed. The only woman-specific skill involved is breastfeeding, for couples that forego formula.
No, women do not have the magic touch when it comes to diaper changing. Or bottle feeding. Or getting the kid to sleep. So Azarenka is no less entitled to resume her career than Federer or Djokovic were.
>Billy McGee
that cant be a real person
Two adults acting like children have a baby then tear each other part in court. Depressing...
Children raising children.
It's going on right now in my own family, and three grandchildren are suffering from the whole situation...The blind leading the blind man.
She must of done something really bad for the father to get custody
I know you are not meant to pry but they went from a happy couple at Wimbledon in July to separation in August after becoming parents last December.
Just tell me how this happened or do I have to wait for the movie!
Most women go back to work after having a baby. He's 7 months. It's not as though she gave birth two weeks ago or something.
Which is why Azarenka wanted the child to travel to New York with her and will not go now that the father refuses to agree to the travel.Except that the vast majority of mothers probably work no more than 1 hour away from their homes, so they get to home at night and see their child, and should anything come up, they can leave work and attend to the child. When you're in an entirely different city playing a tournament, you really don't have that luxury.
He didn't get custody; custody determinations have yet to be made. She simply cannot travel out of state with the child without his consent.It could just simply be her lifestyle/work. Because she travels so much for work and isn't able to be in the same place for more than a few weeks at a time, then that could be extremely problematic to the development of the child, and I doubt it's terribly practical to bring a small child under 2-3 years of age with you as you travel and play 25-30 different tournaments during the year. While the vast majority of custody cases ultimately end up going to the mother, there are special kinds of exemptions or cases in which the father is deemed the more suitable parent to raise the child.
He didn't get custody; custody determinations have yet to be made. She simply cannot travel out of state with the child without his consent.
Far from odd that the court would require that he be in agreement with the travel. He's the fellow parent after all. I'm pretty certain the requirement runs both ways.
Sure biology does not count in the imaginary worlds concocted by social justice warriors.
Sure biology does not count in the imaginary worlds concocted by social justice warriors.
The custody dispute may force her into retirement. She might miss the Aussie Open over this.
Offtopic, Azarenka seems like an imposible woman to live with.
Sure biology does not count in the imaginary worlds concocted by social justice warriors.
I disagree, they are!
How about you inform yourself about paternal versus maternal care in apes?
Azarenka has a problem with the human institution called law, not human evolution.
She wants to be with her child and the father wants to be with his child.
Once the child leaves America, as well, his legal position could be infinitely worse and he knows it.
With her not being American is the reason she is not allowed to leave the US with their son.
Wrong. I've seen instances when fathers can be better/more capable than mothers in caring for babies.
This myth of mothers being better is perpetuated because oh well, they were not left with much choice and not too many fathers were willing to take on caring for babies. Women aren't born with any special skills in child care any more than men.
No one--not you, or those who "liked" your post--know anything about the woman. Yet some of the same have defended players with the worst personal actions (and crimes) played out in their personal lives.
Not a surprise.
My opinion is based on what I have seen from her from interviews and on court behavior. I am not claiming that this is 100% true and I am not forcing my thoughts on anyone. And speaking about defending worse people, Azarenka is constanly bragging about something and abusing the rules. Not to mention her screaming which is affecting a lot of her opponents.
Apparently her "partner" saw that a bit differently at some point, no?