R
red rook
Guest
This frame/mold is getting a lot of love from the top 100 (auger, kecmanovic, ceccinato, sock, Ryan Harrison etc) so I had to take a peek.
Not that I am any authority but I have now played around 8 sessions (probably 12 sets or so) with the aero vs (4.5 aggressive baseliner). I now have four aero vs’s (these are the lighter, non-tour ones)
Having played the blade for so long (3-4 years) I am always interested those threads we always see: “blade-like with more spin/power.” Well, there are quite a few differences b/w the blade and vs. some good, some not so good, and some just different. I have 12 2015 18x20 blades. Yes, 12 (5 have cracked coming out of my sweaty hands on serves).
The vs is probably on the edge for me for the power of racquet I like. It gives me much more power and spin (kick especially). The stringbed is still fairly tight, which still gives control. This is not the pure aero and shouldn’t really be compared to one. This is a power/control racquet for people who like to hit big serves and forehand, but not so big you lose control a la regular pure aero. This sharing a name with the pure aero is kind of a misnomer. I’m able to “hit out” with my forehand and the ball stays in. I can see why ceccinato, auger, sock, kecmanovic, Harrison etc like it. I actually like to string it lower 43 lbs with 16 gauge cyclone and 16 gauge hyper g. Higher launch angle observed which was to be expected.
Now the not so good. The blade has much better feel and touch. The blade’s stability and plow is way better. The blade is actually more forgiving. The blade’s whole stringbed gives a similar ball flight no matter where you hit. Volleys are much more reliable. The blade’s feel is just more solid. I tuned up the lead on the vs such that the “calculated” twistweiggt was supposedly higher than the blade but the blade is just more stable on off center hits, particularly on volleys, touch shots, and overheads. The blade is solid. The vs is comparatively stiff, hollow-feeling, and not very forgiving.
But the bottom line is that I’m undefeated with this vs. The help on my serve and forehand kind of outweigh the detractions from leaving the blade. The way I play I have to be aggressive to keep up with these defensive youngsters. So for the first time in a while I will have an extended play test.
I did have to lead it a lot. Many people will probably scoff at all the weight I put on here but it’s still absurdly light for the swing weight I could achieve. 3 grams at 12, 3.5 grams at 3 and 9 (1.75 g each side), and 3 grams at tail. This, plus the 5 or 5.5 grams overgrip and I’m around 329 grams static, 336 swing weight, 4 pts headlight. I might add more static weight to get to 332-333 grams or so.
The VS is not the end all be all but it has control while hitting a big ball. I haven’t fully made up my mind but am enjoying the vs more than I thought I would.
Not that I am any authority but I have now played around 8 sessions (probably 12 sets or so) with the aero vs (4.5 aggressive baseliner). I now have four aero vs’s (these are the lighter, non-tour ones)
Having played the blade for so long (3-4 years) I am always interested those threads we always see: “blade-like with more spin/power.” Well, there are quite a few differences b/w the blade and vs. some good, some not so good, and some just different. I have 12 2015 18x20 blades. Yes, 12 (5 have cracked coming out of my sweaty hands on serves).
The vs is probably on the edge for me for the power of racquet I like. It gives me much more power and spin (kick especially). The stringbed is still fairly tight, which still gives control. This is not the pure aero and shouldn’t really be compared to one. This is a power/control racquet for people who like to hit big serves and forehand, but not so big you lose control a la regular pure aero. This sharing a name with the pure aero is kind of a misnomer. I’m able to “hit out” with my forehand and the ball stays in. I can see why ceccinato, auger, sock, kecmanovic, Harrison etc like it. I actually like to string it lower 43 lbs with 16 gauge cyclone and 16 gauge hyper g. Higher launch angle observed which was to be expected.
Now the not so good. The blade has much better feel and touch. The blade’s stability and plow is way better. The blade is actually more forgiving. The blade’s whole stringbed gives a similar ball flight no matter where you hit. Volleys are much more reliable. The blade’s feel is just more solid. I tuned up the lead on the vs such that the “calculated” twistweiggt was supposedly higher than the blade but the blade is just more stable on off center hits, particularly on volleys, touch shots, and overheads. The blade is solid. The vs is comparatively stiff, hollow-feeling, and not very forgiving.
But the bottom line is that I’m undefeated with this vs. The help on my serve and forehand kind of outweigh the detractions from leaving the blade. The way I play I have to be aggressive to keep up with these defensive youngsters. So for the first time in a while I will have an extended play test.
I did have to lead it a lot. Many people will probably scoff at all the weight I put on here but it’s still absurdly light for the swing weight I could achieve. 3 grams at 12, 3.5 grams at 3 and 9 (1.75 g each side), and 3 grams at tail. This, plus the 5 or 5.5 grams overgrip and I’m around 329 grams static, 336 swing weight, 4 pts headlight. I might add more static weight to get to 332-333 grams or so.
The VS is not the end all be all but it has control while hitting a big ball. I haven’t fully made up my mind but am enjoying the vs more than I thought I would.