Exactly. Straight is the gameplan (can get the most power); but sometimes Reality gets in the way and 'whatever it takes'.I hit straight, but if I am out of time, I focus more on the control of the racket head. And a lot of those times I am sure i hit bent arm.
This. Mostly straight, but the resulting shot is the priority, not the form.I hit straight, but if I am out of time, I focus more on the control of the racket head. And a lot of those times I am sure i hit bent arm.
I hit straight, but if I am out of time, I focus more on the control of the racket head. And a lot of those times I am sure i hit bent arm.
Exactly. Straight is the gameplan (can get the most power); but sometimes Reality gets in the way and 'whatever it takes'.
Exactly.This. Mostly straight, but the resulting shot is the priority, not the form.
all the fastest recorded Fhs have been bent arms to my knowledge....I hsed to think that straight is more powerful, but I'm not so sure anymore, after watching Kyrgios..
Blake, Murray, Monfils...all have double bend.all the fastest recorded Fhs have been bent arms to my knowledge....
Blake, Murray, Monfils...all have double bend.
But I would asterisk that since it's questionable whether it is causation as being suggested here or merely correlation--straight arm FHs aren't very common, and Fedal don't hit big forehands often because they don't need to. Verdasco is a different animal however.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Right, and I'm not trying to say the double bend for sure means a bigger Fh, but that clearly a double bend allows for the biggest Fhs we see in tennis history. My main point is that the DB doesn't inhibit available power.Blake, Murray, Monfils...all have double bend.
But I would asterisk that since it's questionable whether it is causation as being suggested here or merely correlation--straight arm FHs aren't very common, and Fedal don't hit big forehands often because they don't need to. Verdasco is a different animal however.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's just another way of saying "bent arm forehand". It's when your elbow is a little bent at contact.What is double bend? Any pic to illustrate?
Right, and I'm not trying to say the double bend for sure means a bigger Fh, but that clearly a double bend allows for the biggest Fhs we see in tennis history. My main point is that the DB doesn't inhibit available power.
Big Fh no doubt, but no bigger than the fastest recorded DB Fhs and Imo he sort of mixes the 2 types a bit. He doesn't seem to go straight quite as early or stay straight quite as long with his Fh Imo.I've seen quite a few players play live. Del Potro has the biggest forehand I've ever seen. Straight or bent?
I've seen quite a few players play live. Del Potro has the biggest forehand I've ever seen. Straight or bent?
My question related to him being a SA (not saying he is not, but) it gets close to straight later Imo and doesn't stay straight that long because he seems start bending pretty early. Do you see it that way at all?I'd class him as part of the straight forehand camp (my arm still looks slightly bent when fully straight, and I don't think my arm ever looked as straight at contact as DelPo's does), though the racket-face on the takeback doesn't look like Federer or Nadal. I didn't realize how old-school eastern fh his grip is, wow!
More important than how you should hit it is how you CAN hit it.
Less than 30% of player's hit with straight elbows.
Less than 10% of WTA hit's with straight elbows.
Where do YOU stand?
My question related to him being a SA (not saying he is not, but) it gets close to straight later Imo and doesn't stay straight that long because he seems start bending pretty early. Do you see it that way at all?
I hit straight and use bent arm only when I'm jammed (I think).Exactly. Straight is the gameplan (can get the most power); but sometimes Reality gets in the way and 'whatever it takes'.