Why did he lose the 2012 final, I never really hear about that one.Probably 2012 due to being the closest scoreline. And his great level pre-final.
After that, probably 2010 comes second.
2010. He was playing flawless tennis and just ran into Nadal possibly playig some of the greatest tennis in the Majors ever seen. 2007 he was still a puppy.Djokovic has lost 6 times in USO Finals, under different circumstances. In which year do you think was his best version that he lost in the final? You can consider form throughout the tournament or just in the final, or whatever else.
2012 should not be losing? Why?2013 Djokovic was a mental midget due to RG and many slam F loses but 2013 was his best level physically and he shouldn’t of lost the way he did.
He has 0-40 on Nadal serve at 4-4 in the 3rd lost the game and won 1 more game the whole match.
2016 he was awful.
2010. He was good but Nadal was the better player.
2021 Not the best but Med played well.
2007 good fight but Fed was better player than him.
2012. Shouldn’t be losing that
That Djokovic was better than Murray. Also after the 3rd and 4th it seemed he would win easily.2012 should not be losing? Why?
Djokovic is such a class act to this day he has never mentioned an injury issue but i am sure he had a leg problem the final set if memory serves me right. Ironically after this years Us Open that 5th set was preceded by an extended toilet break.That Djokovic was better than Murray. Also after the 3rd and 4th it seemed he would win easily.
Overall Murray deserved it but I feel Djokovic shouldn’t be losing that
Don’t think he had a injury just think it was cramps so it’s up too the players to not cramp so Murray deserved that way. No matter what it was the 5th set he was hampered no doubt.Djokovic is such a class act to this day he has never mentioned an injury issue but i am sure he had a leg problem the final set if memory serves me right. Ironically after this years Us Open that 5th set was preceded by an extended toilet break.
Injuries are frustrating.
The one i feel he was robbed was 2016. Basically he was undercooked due to 3 of his opponents retiring in matches against him. I like wawrinka but i actually do not think he is the albatross for Novak people make him out to be.
At the end of 2013, Djokovic had 6 slams, which does prove he was an ATG at that time, but just barely. In the Becker/Edberg league of ATG's. That would change...2013. He had all the Mojo from 2011 and was a boba fide ATG.
Yes Wawrinka was error prone that dayDon’t think he had a injury just think it was cramps so it’s up too the players to not cramp so Murray deserved that way. No matter what it was the 5th set he was hampered no doubt.
2016 version was a poor Djokovic. Draw falling apart aside he was awful and that Wawrinka was the worst one he faced yet he still lost.
Well that was because he only hit his elite level in 2011.At the end of 2013, Djokovic had 6 slams, which does prove he was an ATG at that time, but just barely. In the Becker/Edberg league of ATG's. That would change...
I bet that Wawrinka couldn’t believe his luck as RG 15 he peaked and his level AO 14 was great with AO13 being his best, US16 he didn’t play well at all and still wonYes Wawrinka was error prone that day
Wawrinka a solid 5th the last era behind fedalovic and Murray but i do feel Del Potro was a better player.I bet that Wawrinka couldn’t believe his luck as RG 15 he peaked and his level AO 14 was great with AO13 being his best, US16 he didn’t play well at all and still won
Too many failures. Shame on him.2007 was a bit choke-y and he wasn't super good anyway
2010 was actually a perfectly solid performance; not much bad with it but of course his game wasn't as refined as it would be in 2011
2012 was really, really good pre-final, but his final performance was pretty crap; however, this was largely the fault of the windy conditions
2013 was quite choke-y and he was downright bad for some stretches; still pretty good overall but not that great
2016 was kinda bad; Stan didn't really have to bring a godly level or anything in that match
2021 goes without saying
I think the answer's 2010, followed by 2013, 2012, 2007, 2016, and 2021 in that order I think.
2010 was his best performance if you look at it from his overall level perspective. In 2010 he wasn’t the player he is now and Nadal was having his best season. Nadal was just a better player than him.2007 was a bit choke-y and he wasn't super good anyway
2010 was actually a perfectly solid performance; not much bad with it but of course his game wasn't as refined as it would be in 2011
2012 was really, really good pre-final, but his final performance was pretty crap; however, this was largely the fault of the windy conditions
2013 was quite choke-y and he was downright bad for some stretches; still pretty good overall but not that great
2016 was kinda bad; Stan didn't really have to bring a godly level or anything in that match
2021 goes without saying
I think the answer's 2010, followed by 2013, 2012, 2007, 2016, and 2021 in that order I think.
Do you think if the weather was fair Djokovic would 100% win it? He and Murray played a very close match that year at AO, and Murray was in a good stretch of his career, maybe he would win even without the wind?2012 obviously. He rolled through that tournament over Wawrinka, Del Potro and Ferrer and only lost one set before the final. His points dominance and games dominance was higher than Murray's that tournament and no way should he have lost that to anyone in the draw. Out of all his Slam final losses, that's the worst one because it's the one he definitely should have won.
I would say 2010.
Nadal was just too good in the final with his aggressive groundstrokes and that serve (it was like a Sampras/Roddick hybrid just for that tournament), that was the best match on HC that Nadal has played against Djokovic so far.
2012 obviously. He rolled through that tournament over Wawrinka, Del Potro and Ferrer and only lost one set before the final. His points dominance and games dominance was higher than Murray's that tournament and no way should he have lost that to anyone in the draw. Out of all his Slam final losses, that's the worst one because it's the one he definitely should have won.
2013. He had all the Mojo from 2011 and was a boba fide ATG.
2010 Nole was basically still the third wheel.
2013 wasn't one of his best forms.2012 and 2013 , he had no business losing those finals. Others are understandable. He should not have been in 2016 finals in the first place.
Excuses that I don’t like to give as a Djokovic fan (unlike most nadal fans here)2013 wasn't one of his best forms.
You shouldn't say it was his best form just because he was in his prime.Excuses that I don’t like to give as a Djokovic fan (unlike most nadal fans here)
Excuses that I don’t like to give as a Djokovic fan (unlike most nadal fans here)
Exactly. Nadal was crispy af and hadn't lost a HC match all year at that point. The excuses about 2013 are as stale as bread from September.
Wow completely forgot about Nadal not losing a hc match till then Don't think even peak Fed at Us open would have beat him then (imho, maybe 2004/2006 would go to 5).
P.S
2010 US open Nadal was probably even better. ( 2010 Serve wise, speed, aggression but groundies slight edge 2013...)
P.S.S
Djokovic 2013 was a better player than 2010 in the U.S finals and overall a much better player in general.
You shouldn't say it was his best form just because he was in his prime.
Wow completely forgot about Nadal not losing a hc match till then. Don't think even peak Fed at Us open would have beat him then (imho, maybe 2004/2006 would go to 5).
P.S
2010 US open Nadal was probably even better. ( 2010 Serve wise, speed, aggression but groundies slight edge 2013...)
P.S.S
Djokovic 2013 was a better player than 2010 in the U.S finals and overall a much better player in general.
2013 was great Djokovic. He should not even have lost the third set. It was huge effort from Nadal to win that set and then he streamerolled. Fair play to Rafa for playing amazing.
2012 was close but the final was very weird with wind affecting the first 2 sets to that extent.
The Djokosmash gets memed but it let him down at crucial junctures in
I like this one too.
All the losses in 2013 do not make much difference. He lost many close matches but was in peak form. Reaching 3 finals in slams, winning AO and WTF, and only reason he didn't reach 4th final was because Nadal's ranking was down. He beat Wawrinka 2 times (second last time he beat Wawrinka in slam ever), Murray, in slams and his real problem that year was Nadal just like how he was the problem for Nadal. Without Nadal, he would have 3 slams and a final that year.2013 - The great Djokovic lost to his pigeon Del Potro in IW, was blasted off the court in the only time he didn't reach the Miami final between 2011 and 2016 to old man Haas, choked away a match in epic fashion to his other pigeon Berdych in Rome, went into mental meltdown against Dimitrov in Madrid....laid a massive egg in the W final, getting crushed in straights in his only loss in a W final, loses to Isner in Cincinnati....but yeah, 2013 Djokovic was great.
In my opinion results are what they are. But giving excuses you are just undermining a legitimate victory of the opponent. But Djokovic worked his *** off, came back mentally strong and won the Wimbledon 2014. We all know about his golden run after that. Win or lose Everything is a lessonExactly. Nadal was crispy af and hadn't lost a HC match all year at that point. The excuses about 2013 are as stale as bread from September.