jim courier
Agassi had a good forehand and a great backhand.
All Courier had was a forehand, movement, and stamina. His serve was average when it was on. And his backhand was a decent rally shot at best. I'd certainly hope Courier's forehand was better than Agassi, otherwise Agassi should be embarrassed that he ever lost to a guy that he was better than in every single way.
So yea, Courier's Forehand >> Agassi's Forehand.... but....
Arias' Forehand > Courier's Forehand
Actually Courier had a dynamite serve at his peak when he was no 1.
Fired off quite a few unreturnables and aces, and when he didn't he smacked a few forehands to finish the point. He was relentless.
Sure, it might not be as good as Pete/Boris/Goran, but I'd hesitate to call it average.
Thank you! Courier's serve was big, with a huge kick. His backhand was big, too! A very short wind-up, wrist snap, and shoulder turn made it a devastating return of serve, as well. Nevertheless, IMO, Agassi's groundies were better on both sides. The reason Agassi lost to Courier at the FO was because Courier was mentally tougher and ready to win, and Agassi wasn't.
Actually Courier had a dynamite serve at his peak when he was no 1.
Fired off quite a few unreturnables and aces, and when he didn't he smacked a few forehands to finish the point. He was relentless.
Sure, it might not be as good as Pete/Boris/Goran, but I'd hesitate to call it average.