D
Deleted member 762049
Guest
Or at least one per surface.
This. + WTF Final BO5 surely.I think the finals should be BO5, too. Maybe SF. But, there should also be a week off between all Masters.
ok boomer
"baby boomers" also called "boomers" are people born after WWII(1946-1964)Son, what does that even mean?
Old.Son, what does that even mean?
FedererSon, what does that even mean?
Well preserved.Old.
YE Final Best of Five should not have been stopped.
Rod Laver could give it a shot in this case, maybe even in a clash with Ken RosewallGrand Slams should just be a single set tiebreak, first to 5 points
Rod Laver could give it a shot in this case, maybe even in a clash with Ken Rosewall
Don't worry about it too much. It's the new catch-all response to anything. Even kids say it to other kids. You could think of it as the new "no you".Son, what does that even mean?
I hope you mean the "Sudden Death Tiebreak" with possible 5-4. Because who will watch if he doesn’t know when it ends? If they play for two points difference, they could play like forever.Grand Slams should just be a single set tiebreak, first to 5 points
Ok, snowflakeok boomer
Don't worry about it too much. It's the new catch-all response to anything. Even kids say it to other kids. You could think of it as the new "no you".
And you are the gold standard of sanity...This I agree with but people wanting Masters to go back to BO5 are nuts.
People playing the generational blame game when the answer comes down to one simple thing: There's too damn many people on this planet now compared to then.OK Boomer, OK Millennial, we need to talk
Who has ruined everything more? Millennial Jill Filipovic and Baby Boomer Paul Callan do battle over 'OK Boomer,' the two words used by Millennials, Gen X-ers and Gen Z-ers to cut down a heedless generation they say has pulled up the ladder on the youngs. But Boomers beg to differ.www.cnn.com
And you are the gold standard of sanity...
Yep....and you can fit every person on the planet into a 1 cubic mile spacePeople playing the generational blame game when the answer comes down to one simple thing: There's too damn many people on this planet now compared to then.
YE Final Best of Five should not have been stopped.
It was done to accommodate the top players! If they won one, it would be hard to follow it up with another if they got into a 5 set battle that wipes them out for a couple weeks! IW's was notorious for that even if not hot; sand and wind also made it brutal at times extending matches to 4+ hours! To me it was more an anomaly to have someone play and win some of those BO5 events back to back! I still have a mental picture of Agassi going down to Edberg in 4 long sets that just went on forever in both IW's and Miami in 1990! They'd never be able to get away with that today with how long matches drag on!
I get MS1000 change, but WTF/YE final. The only affect would be on Davis Cup Final.
A masters is a masters. Keep it best of 3. WTF's final should be best of 5.
Grand Slams should just be a single set tiebreak, first to 5 points
ok boomer
Ok, here's what I thinkk you should do. Take that overweight arse of yours back down to your mom';s basement. She already has a lover, anyway. And go **** yourself.
All I can think of is "who was in charge during these massive changes?" Fed was Prez and Nadal was his VP! They just made life easier for themselves and extended their careers to no end; and still going strong! Conspiracy that the ATP Council should look at?
I'd guess it was more the TV networks money became larger and the dominant revenue stream, so they were able to put pressure on tournaments. But no player's council would've resisted this change imo, as it benefits the players as well. The only ones losing are the fans.
It's still not playing for the most part! They might as well continue doing tape delayed and edited video playing at 1 am on ESPN! I can imagine most people "don't have" access to TCC! It's not part of a basic cable package! My building's made a deal so I get extras due to so many subscribers, but single families are probably going without and checking stream services! I grew up spoiled when tennis was regularly telecast on the networks! One day around '75, BJK was being shown on 3 channels at the same time; 1 live, 2 taped events! I'm not going to make a big deal about the change in format of tourneys! Even with how things have been laid out helping Fedalovic, the new crop won't have the same success even after their retirements! Medvedev was shocked by Tsitsipas at the YEC in their RR match! Perseus hadn't won in 5 matches! Upsets will occur with today's players that didn't happen much with Fed, Rafa, & Nole! They've been amazing like in no other era before!
Good point on the lack of coverage for ATP events, although I think they're better covered on European channels. I do think if there were a Sampras or Agassi, E!SPN (or maybe FSN or something) would've made a bid for some of these events (ATP Finals, IW, Cincy).
or a coin toss
ok boomer
And Sicilian at that.ok boomer
And Sicilian at that.
A bit touchy lately due to some misadventures on another site. Thankschill, it was a joke. I didn’t mean any offence, I don’t even know how old are you. No need to get mad over some internet comment, n’est-ce pas?
Horrible idea given the grueling nature of today's game. Perhaps at WTF with some reformatting, but almost some kind of punishment for the winners doing what you suggest.Or at least one per surface.