Check the Wikipedia page regarding big four

[Zain786]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Four_(tennis)

The stats are crazy..absolutely crazy. Some may disagree with Murray being part of the dominant trio in Fed, Nadal and Djokovic but please check the page out. This is truly unparalleled in men's tennis.

 

[beltsman]

Two GOATs, one faker, and one pretender. Big Two and that's it.

 

[Rebel-I.N.S]

Murray's H2H record in Masters finals >>>>

 

[Zoolander]

I find it disturbing that someone is apparently so obsessed by the "big 4" that they would write what amounts to a four million word essay on them on wiki, stats included. I didnt have the time to scroll, never mind read, through it all.

Was that you, OP? Is that your handiwork?!

 

[Adv. Edberg]

Who can write up the Weak Era wiki? It's needed apparently.

 

[Zain786]

I find it disturbing that someone is apparently so obsessed by the "big 4" that they would write what amounts to a four million word essay on them on wiki, stats included. I didnt have the time to scroll, never mind read, through it all.

Was that you, OP? Is that your handiwork?!

Haha, no..I have been keeping an eye however. Wiki can be edited by anyone anywhere, there are many out there who may be obsessed with the so called big four including many on this forum.

 

[tacou]

Six years running they were the top four ranked players in the world.

 

[Deleted member 688153]

I find it disturbing that someone is apparently so obsessed by the "big 4" that they would write what amounts to a four million word essay on them on wiki, stats included. I didnt have the time to scroll, never mind read, through it all.

Was that you, OP? Is that your handiwork?!

To be fair, the articles on Bieber and Kim Kardashian are probably longer.

 

[torpantennis]

Andy was lucky with what happened with Soderling and Del Potro, the two players who were a much bigger threat for Big 3.

 

[Slice'n'dice]

Andy was lucky with what happened with Soderling and Del Potro, the two players who were a much bigger threat for Big 3.

Nah, no evidence for that I'm afraid.

 

[Mainad]

Andy was lucky with what happened with Soderling and Del Potro, the two players who were a much bigger threat for Big 3.

If they had they been a much bigger threat to the Big 3 then they, and not Andy, would have been considered members of a Big 4 or Big 5. But they never were quite simply because they weren't.

Soderling and Del Potro have a combined H2H of 16-62 vs the Big 3 (Soderling, 4-28 and Del Potro 12-34). Murray alone is 26-51 and has won 2 Slams, an Olympic gold medal and 7 Masters titles against the Big 3. Del Potro and Soderling combined have managed to win 1 Slam. Need I say more?

Incidentally, Soderling and Del Potro have a combined H2H of 4-8 vs Murray.

 

[NatF]

Murray has won a lot of masters.

 

[Deleted member 21996]

Two GOATs, one faker, and one pretender. Big Two and that's it.

I agree. Nadal the 5th has no place in there

 

[mike danny]

The article is wrong. In 2013 Federer wasn't in the top 4.

 

[ArcspacE]

@Mainad - was that you?

 

[mike danny]

Also the Big 4 did not dominate as a group in 2010.

 

[OhYes]

Two GOATs, one faker, and one pretender. Big Two and that's it.

When "faker" slides easily under 2 GOAT's radar for so many years, what that means for GOAT level of those 2 ?
2 GOATS not been able to stop GOAT in the process.

 

[Mainad]

@Mainad - was that you?

Was what me?

 

[ArcspacE]

Was what me?

The article author?

 

[Mainad]

The article author?

You must be joking. I'm far too lazy to do all that work putting an article of that length together!

I suspect it was the work of several authors anyway.

 

[jm1980]

You must be joking. I'm far too lazy to do all that work putting an article of that length together!

I suspect it was the work of several authors anyway.

486 different users edited the page

https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/wikihistory/wh.php?page_title=Big_Four_(tennis)

 

[Deleted member 688153]

486 different users edited the page

https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/wikihistory/wh.php?page_title=Big_Four_(tennis)

It's Wiki though.
Half of them are probably some IP schmo adding a full stop and a subsequent 3-month edit/reversal war, some prepubescant kid blanking the page in the name of 1337 hax, or most likely, a guy correcting some spelling in the references section so that his name is recorded as the most recent editor.

 

[nolefam_2024]

I find it disturbing that someone is apparently so obsessed by the "big 4" that they would write what amounts to a four million word essay on them on wiki, stats included. I didnt have the time to scroll, never mind read, through it all.

Was that you, OP? Is that your handiwork?!

I have read that page so many times. I love the stats. They dominate tennis for so long time, its nice to read.

 

[Jaitock1991]

It's Wiki though.
Half of them are probably some IP schmo adding a full stop and a subsequent 3-month edit/reversal war, some prepubescant kid blanking the page in the name of 1337 hax, or most likely, a guy correcting some spelling in the references section so that his name is recorded as the most recent editor.

Weak era.

 

[Tennease]