Comparing the Dunlop Aerogel 4D 200 with the Biometric 200

[winstonplum]

Comparing the Dunlop Aerogel 4D 200 with the Biomimetic 200

I'm in a long, hard-core demo phase and I haven't picked up a Dunlop since the late eighties and Graf's old stick. I'll probably demo the Biomimetic but TW doesn't have the Aerogel 4D 200 for demo? How would you describe the difference between the two, Dunlop lovers?

 

[steve260z]

Very similar, the Bio has a bit more pop and more plow through IMO. Better volleys but the 4d is a bit softer.

 

[Hidious]

Very similar, the Bio has a bit more pop and more plow through IMO. Better volleys but the 4d is a bit softer.

I somehow doubt that.

 

[jnd28]

I had not picked up a Dunlop since I played with the original 200G . Recently started playing with the Biomenetic Max 200G and absolutely love it. It is not the original 200 G but it sure reminds me of it!

Have not played with other Dunlops other than a frame I cannot recall what it was, so I cannot provide a pov on the comparison but if you are looking for a great volley stick with tons of control and enough power you dont need to look much further than the Max 200G

JMHO
JND28

 

[MomentumGT]

I'm in a long, hard-core demo phase and I haven't picked up a Dunlop since the late eighties and Graf's old stick. I'll probably demo the Biomimetic but TW doesn't have the Aerogel 4D 200 for demo? How would you describe the difference between the two, Dunlop lovers?

A few of my friends who use the 4D said the Bio200 was kind of a weird racquet for them lol. The 4D is just solid all around while the bio200 felt like it had more pop but also felt a considerable more flex. I own the ag200, 4D, and bio200Plus. I was debating between the bio200 vs the Plus but went with the plus since it felt more comfortable and had just a tad more pop then the regular 200.

I personally think the bio200 is still a very nice and solid racquet but 4d>bio200 imo.

-Jon