Third Serve
Talk Tennis Guru
Thread OP is completely correct, but most reasonable people already believe this. Trolls are just gonna keep trolling.
A man who eats such creatures for dinner is not to be trifled with...Something that will BOMB your FACE until you DIE.
Safin definitely messed up that one. Literally no one else would lose a slam final to Johansson.
But hey, better than losing a slam final to Gaudio at least. He is the worst slam winner to ever exist probably outside those early AO champs when AO wasn't as important as it became later.
Safin definitely messed up that one. Literally no one else would lose a slam final to Johansson.
But hey, better than losing a slam final to Gaudio at least. He is the worst slam winner to ever exist probably outside those early AO champs when AO wasn't as important as it became later.
LOL no.
Just exposing your false Fed had it tougher arguments and glorifying his competition.
Cause that is what you've been doing these days. Guy A was great, guy B was even better, and so on, while in reality the number of good matches they gave him over those 4 years is lolworthy. Often they either killed each other off on the way to Federer or were too busy losing 1st round matches. Hip butchered Guga showed them how it's done, tho.
Well, Johnasson did win a masters, reached another slam semi (where he dropped only one set en route) and another 2 slam quarters. I'd say he's not the worst, but fair enough.Level-wise Gaudio was better actually I think, he did destroy Hewitt and Nalbandian en route while TJ went 5 with J Novak in SF. I used to say Johansson was the worst real slam winner in OE, dummy AOs aside, but now Thiem rivals him with that pathetic USO final lol.
Well yeah, but Coria lost for different (sport related) reasons. Can't imagine any top 10 player today getting drunk on the eve of the final and bringing 3 "ladies" along.
A man who eats such creatures for dinner is not to be trifled with...
Safin himself denies he was drunk, actually was quite taken aback at the suggestion lol. It's in a Russian interview he gave a year ago, posted somewhere on sports.ru. He did admit he had some fun and went to sleep after 3 am, which had an obvious effect.
Man, in how many fields can you be this unprofessional and get away with it?Safin himself denies he was drunk, actually was quite taken aback at the suggestion lol. It's in a Russian interview he gave a year ago, posted somewhere on sports.ru. He did admit he had some fun and went to sleep after 3 am, which had an obvious effect.
Well, Johnasson did win a masters, reached another slam semi (where he dropped only one set en route) and another 2 slam quarters. I'd say he's not the worst, but fair enough.
He did get lucky with his side of the draw at the 2002 AO though. He doesn't even reach the final if he in placed on the other side that was packed with Federer, Haas and pre-final Safin.
Btw in that AO final Safin's lob on CP was absolutely in but I guess he would have lost anyway. That version of Safin was not ready for five sets lol
Thank you. OP is straw manning for responses/likesThe problem with Safin is not that he played well in 2 tournaments (what is the point of pandering to the stupidest argument imaginable by people who - if they actually exist - obviously don't know what they're talking about?), but that he clearly had the game and the nerve to go toe to toe with the best in the world on the biggest stages on the biggest days, and he spent most of his career whizzing that potential down the drain.
The 2008 Wimbledon run actually really infuriated me, because I spent those last years of his career after the injury in 2005 thinking his physical setbacks had totally derailed him, when that run suggested that this was, in fact, probably not the case.
Man, in how many fields can you be this unprofessional and get away with it?
The 2008 Wimbledon run actually really infuriated me, because I spent those last years of his career after the injury in 2005 thinking his physical setbacks had totally derailed him, when that run suggested that this was, in fact, probably not the case.
One great run from him didn't change his overall issues after 2005. The stars just aligned for one last great run where he rolled back the years on grass of all surfaces.The problem with Safin is not that he played well in 2 tournaments (what is the point of pandering to the stupidest argument imaginable by people who - if they actually exist - obviously don't know what they're talking about?), but that he clearly had the game and the nerve to go toe to toe with the best in the world on the biggest stages on the biggest days, and he spent most of his career whizzing that potential down the drain.
The 2008 Wimbledon run actually really infuriated me, because I spent those last years of his career after the injury in 2005 thinking his physical setbacks had totally derailed him, when that run suggested that this was, in fact, probably not the case.
Yep.Safin is the most successful player with the sort of injury record he had.
2000, 2002 and 2004 only injury free seasons. 2005 knee injury ended him. Never won a title after 2005 AO and only reached one final in Moscow in 2008.
2003 could have been a great year for him but fell on his wrist at the AO - the man he had to withdraw against went on to reach the final in Schuettler.
He was not the same Safin from 2006 onward, but still played in some dramatic matches as a shadow.
I already responded with the example of Wim 08 SF.
The 2nd part is the joke being on you. shows your utter saltiness+cluelessness, boy.
If we're just considering good as the level and in slams ->
AO 04 Hewitt/Nalby (&even Ferrero played well)
RG 04 Guga
Wim 04 Hewitt/Roddick
USO 04 Agassi
AO 05 Safin (&even Agassi played some good ball, though not great)
RG 05 Nadal
Wim 05 Hewitt
USO 05 Hewitt&Agassi
AO 06 Davy, Haas (&even Baggy)
RG 06 Nadal
Wim 06 Ancic/Nadal
USO 06 Blake/Roddick
AO 07 Gonzo
RG 07 Davy/Nadal
Wim 07 Nadal
USO 07 Lopez, Roddick, Davy, Djoko
Safin showed how it is done to Djokovic in Wim 08, LMAO. atleast guga was 3 time RG champion rolling back the years and playing very well to take out fed.
I have no problem admitting 2006 was relatively weak/weak however you want to term it (Safin gone, Agassi gone, Hewitt off his prime and Roddick in a slump in 1st half, Djokovic not yet in).. Its just when people bunch in years like 2004,05 and 07 as weak that I call out the BS.
ROFLI already responded with the example of Wim 08 SF.
The 2nd part is the joke being on you. shows your utter saltiness+cluelessness, boy.
If we're just considering good as the level and in slams ->
AO 04 Hewitt/Nalby (&even Ferrero played well)
RG 04 Guga
Wim 04 Hewitt/Roddick
USO 04 Agassi
AO 05 Safin (&even Agassi played some good ball, though not great)
RG 05 Nadal
Wim 05 Hewitt
USO 05 Hewitt&Agassi
AO 06 Davy, Haas (&even Baggy)
RG 06 Nadal
Wim 06 Ancic/Nadal
USO 06 Blake/Roddick
AO 07 Gonzo
RG 07 Davy/Nadal
Wim 07 Nadal
USO 07 Lopez, Roddick, Davy, Djoko
Safin showed how it is done to Djokovic in Wim 08, LMAO. atleast guga was 3 time RG champion rolling back the years and playing very well to take out fed.
I have no problem admitting 2006 was relatively weak/weak however you want to term it (Safin gone, Agassi gone, Hewitt off his prime and Roddick in a slump in 1st half, Djokovic not yet in).. Its just when people bunch in years like 2004,05 and 07 as weak that I call out the BS.
Well, I'm not saying it's definitive, just that it seems likely. Kuerten had hip surgery, which has totally derailed the careers of numerous tennis players for the last 20 years. From 2002 on he missed chunks of time all over the shop and was barely winning matches at the top level. Safin from 2006-09 played near enough a full schedule. Kuerten's last miracle run was also on his favourite surface, not his least favourite where Safin barely had a winning record prior to that 08 run.eh, 1 or 2 runs here and there don't prove what you are saying.
Kuerten also had that run in RG 04 (incl. beating Fed). doesn't mean injuries didn't affect him significantly from 2002 onwards.
Hey, I'm not denying the guys physical problems, obviously he had them all his career, I just no longer bought that the 'shadow of his former self' argument was purely a physical thing. Hewitt had surgery on BOTH his hips by like the age that Safin retired, he was barely playing tennis those last years, and his twilight period still had way more highlights than Safin's did.One great run from him didn't change his overall issues after 2005. The stars just aligned for one last great run where he rolled back the years on grass of all surfaces.
Safin's other main issue was getting some really tough draws like USO 2006 (Nalbandian and Haas before QF), AO 2007 (Roddick in R3) and Wimb 2007 (Federer in R2 or R3) among others.
Yep.
USO 2006 against Nalby and Haas.
AO 2007 against Roddick.
His Wimb 2008 run.
I think Safin in 2009 probably had a moment of "you don't know how much you'll miss it unless it's gone".The match against Haas at the US Open was sickening. The one against Roddick even worse because it was Roddick. Safin barely got past Becker and Sela in 5 each and after he won the second set 6-2 I thought he had a great chance and he let up. He was incredibly slow in that match and 2007 was the worst tennis he played in his career. Safin of 2002, 2003, 2004 or 2005 kills that Roddick.
The most painful year as a fan was 2009, though, because of the Masters Series mainly. He really fought his heart out in many matches that year.
IW - outplayed by Isner, didn't have much of a problem with that.
Miami - Had to beat Monfils to play Roddick in next round. Safin battled to match point in third, missed a forehand clean winner by about 2mm. Monfils behaving like a jackass throughout. I think he lost another MP, too. Wanted it too much.
Monte Carlo - Match against Lapentti was ridiculous. Third set lost in tie break after having battled like crazy to get back into the match, managed to lose.
Rome - Another choke against Robredo. Tight 3 setter.
Madrid - beaten comprehensively by Tsonga who rushed the slow Safin. Fine.
Canada - Lost to Monfils again in 3 set epic. Another match should've won.
Cincinnati - Cruising against Stepanek, but was a very hot day and I think Safin just wanted off the court.
Shanghai - Choked vs Berdych after Berdych took MTO, started running like a rabbit again. Refused to shake hands.
Bercy - Physically dead vs del Potro. Already body in retirement mode and nearly lost against Ascione who was fat and basically retired himself. Still saved face vs del Potro.
The Ouanna match at RG was also a sickening 5 set loss. I was present at the Wimbledon loss vs Levine where he was screwed by line judge from clean backhand down the line winner that would've gave him set point...
As a fan 2004 AO is my favourite Safin event. Because it was the year his fans knew he was back for good (at least for a while) after 2003 disaster. Beat 5 Americans in the event. Vahaly, Martin, Blake, Roddick and Agassi (other was Nieminen).
That's my blabbering.
gaudio and johansson were easily playing well enough to beat Zverev and co.Safin definitely messed up that one. Literally no one else would lose a slam final to Johansson.
But hey, better than losing a slam final to Gaudio at least. He is the worst slam winner to ever exist probably outside those early AO champs when AO wasn't as important as it became later.
i mean obviously he wasn't drunk IN the final lmao, but he definitely woke up with a hangover and likely even further drained of fluids and such...Safin himself denies he was drunk, actually was quite taken aback at the suggestion lol. It's in a Russian interview he gave a year ago, posted somewhere on sports.ru. He did admit he had some fun and went to sleep after 3 am, which had an obvious effect.
Wasn't RG 2004 a meme final in between as well?2002 AO final was probably the biggest meme of a final till the 2020 USO.
Hangover Safin and One-Slam Wonder Johansson sound like nicknames 90’s Clay would come up with but they’re 100% true lol.
Safin OWNS little Rios in Canada 2002
Two of the most eccentric players on tour put on 3 set show for the Canadian crowd at the 2002 Toronto Masters Series.www.youtube.com
Did Safin even have any weaknesses beyond his mental strength? Massive serve, ATG BH, underrated FH with plenty of attacking power, beast at the net, best mover I've ever seen for his height.
RG 2004 was just tragic. Not gonna call an injury-marred match a meme final. But you can if you want.Wasn't RG 2004 a meme final in between as well?
well he hated playing on grass and didn't have the discipline for clay to be consistent on it. But then again plastic hip titanium knee liver cirrhosis Safin decided to try at Wimbledon for once instead of retire and demolished peak Djokovic, Deliciano, and Stan so maybe it was all just in his head.
lmao he said that? mad ladin 2008 he said “thank you to whoever has been slowing down the grass“ when asked about his success at Wimbledon.
Djokovic was in pretty good grass form at the time. He had just played that epic match against Nadal at Queens.
Safin is a lot like Stan, His ideals surface is a mid paste, mid bounce. Gives him time to set up his strokes and use his power advantage vs the field, but not so slow that he can’t get through the court.
Haas was underrated as a player. Who knows how he would have done without his injury troubles.As someone who likes Gaudio, always makes me laugh when he gets labeled worst slam winner. Dunno if I'd disagree though
Also for anybody who hasn't watched highlights of the Safin Haas 2002 AO match, just go do it. That's the source of my favorite tennis gif that I post all the time. Pretty high quality stuff in that one I think.
He was the mad lad before it became popular.lmao he said that? mad lad
Whateva and lol at good matches list...
... It does not matter if this or that year was weak or not. What matters is that in your numerous posts and threads you re implying that if:
strength of the field in a random Fed's prime year > strength of the field in a random Novak's prime year
means
Fed had it tougher, therefore Fed>Djoker,
while in fact all of that god tier depth competition hardly ever gave him a real fight, (for this reason or another which is irrelevant). Not to mention deliberate choice of years 2004-2014, 2005-2015 etc).
So, yeah, your drivel is obviously malicious and agenda driven and not to be taken seriously.
Safin is a lot like Stan, His ideals surface is a mid paste, mid bounce. Gives him time to set up his strokes and use his power advantage vs the field, but not so slow that he can’t get through the court.
the 2nd one was 03I did mention the 00 one (he beat both Norman and Ferrero there). not sure how good Ferrero was in 05 tbh - maybe I should check.
the 2nd one was 03
Why bother so much? Federer only played him 12 times. There are 29 players Federer met more times than Safin.
Maybe if Safin was more consistent he'd have troubled him more than Roddick/Hewitt.
Why bother so much? Federer only played him 12 times. There are 29 players Federer met more times than Safin.
Maybe if Safin was more consistent he'd have troubled him more than Roddick/Hewitt.
Many around here seem to be harbouring the myth that Safin played well in only 2 tournaments. - USO 2000 and AO 2005. That's utter and complete bollocks
Short version : Apart from the 2 slams, guy made 2 more slam finals, played well at YEC 2004, won 5 masters titles, made semis of all slams and reached #1 in 2000
Getting into detail
One way to look at it:
Lets start with :
the slams:
1. AO 2004 - beat peak Roddick in 5 sets and very high level Agassi in 5 sets. Spent in the final (esp in set 3). But it was an amazing tournament after almost a year back from injury
2. Wim 2008 - on his worst surface, Safin beat #3 seed Djokovic in straights and made the semi
3. and yes AO 2002 - definitely not a great tournament and final was below par. But he did make the final beating Sampras and Haas. Not something to be pooh-poohed away
4. only lost in a tight 4-set match to eventual finalist Norman (also Rome 2000 winner) in RG 2000 QF. Also reached RG 2002 SF (though he didn't play well in the semi)
5. beat defending champion Kuerten and Agassi at RG in 1998
6. beat Ljubicic, Arazi and T Johansson on the way to semi in USO 01. granted he didn't play well in the semi.
YEC 2004:
beat Coria and Henman convincingly. Only lost in a tight 2 TB match vs Roddick in RR. Played well vs fed in the semi (this was the match with the epic TB)
masters tournaments:
1. won not 1 or 2 masters tournaments, but frigging 5 Masters tournaments:
2. beat Sampras and Ferreria on the way to winning Canada 2000
3. beat Phillipoussis, Grosjean, Corretja and Ferrero on the way to winning Paris 2000. The Paris 2000 final was a classic, high quality encounter.
4. beat Escude, Moya and dominated Hewitt in Paris 2002 win.
5. beat Agassi in straight sets and dominated Nalbandian in Madrid 2004 win
6. beat Hewitt, Canas and Stepanek in Paris 2004 win.
7. made final of Hamburg 2000. Took peak Kuerten to a 5th set TB there.
8. made final of Hamburg 2002 - losing to a fed playing his very best tennis.
Other tournaments:
1. beat Norman (Rome 00 winner and RG 2000 finalist) in Barcelona 2000. Also beat Ferrero there
2. Helped Russia win Davis Cup in 2002. (beat Grosjean&Paul henri Mathieu)
3. Helped Russia win Davis Cup in 2006.
4. won Tashkent & St.Petersburg in 01 beating Kafelnikov in both
II. 2nd way:
Safin reached #1 in 2000. you don't reach frickin' #1 by playing well in one tournament in a year.
Safin won 7 titles in 2000 - including USO 2000, Canada 2000, Paris 2000, Barcelona 2000 and 3 other tournaments. Also made final of Hamburg.
III. 3rd way:
Safin vs top 10:
49/99 (49.5%)
Safin vs top 10 in slams:
13/24 (54.2%)
That's a pretty good record vs top 10 for a 2 slam winner.
Obviously someone playing well in only 2 tournaments cannot do that.
Most trolls who obviously want to trash Federer's competition.Who says he basically only played well in two tournaments though?