RG and Wimbledon will be very tough for him, if he wins RG then I will take notice.
Djokovic-Murray tennis defeated Nadal-Federer brand of tennis by
- More aggressive return of serves
Particularly, Djokovic differentiates himself in this era of defensive baseliners with
- Aggressive tennis on break points.
Question, currently, is whether Federer-Nadal can respond to this raised level of tennis.
IMHO, Nadal clearly changed his tactics but still not enough outside clay.
Supposedly, Federer has been working on these last few years with coaches like
Cahill and Annacone, but he still plays way too conservative/defensive on break chances, IMHO.
Excellent post. You are probably my favorite Federer fan poster, along with zagor.
I mean who is going to stop him?
The US Open is his unless there's another tornado. Wimbledon - Federer will be 32 at the time, Murray has lost the last 3 matches against Djokovic. I guess the only question is the FO cause we haven't seen Nadal in a decade. Thoughts?
Dont count Nadal out... It may have been a while but he's going to be a threat, especially at RG.
Remember the last time he took a few months off with injuries? He won 3/4 of the next slams.
If federer dosent play well in Wimbledon Murray will be have the best chance, but on grass i would pick 32 year old federer over novak and if it rains its really a no contestFederer is getting old. At June 2013, he'll be almost 32 years old. So Novak will still have the best chance.
If Nadal returns healthy, Djok the Ripper isn't even the co-favorite at RG. Even without Nadal, he's not a clear favorite at Wimby (Fed/Murray final wouldn't be out of the question there).
It's January...start this CYGS talk in June or July.
Did Wawrinka actually beat Djokovic. When is the last time Djokovic lost in a slam in a big upset.
Federer isnt beating Djokovic in any slam again, except maybe if they play at Wimbledon in the semis.
LOL none of those players are stopping Djokovic at RG, get real. Del Potro is his slave, outside of grass, even on Del Potros best surface of hard courts, and matches up horribly with Djokovic. Murray might and hopefully will be improved again on clay this year, atleast his 2011 level, but he wont beat Djokovic in a best of 5 on clay when he rarely does it even on hards. Federer isnt beating Djokovic in any slam again, except maybe if they play at Wimbledon in the semis. Nadal is the only real possible danger.
Interesting how the last 3 years have seen a Nadalovic domination of the slams. Djoko played the last 3 finals at AO and USO, Nadal the last 3 finals at RG. Nadal also made 2 of the last 3 at W.
He admitted that Fed could beat him at W which you agree with. I also have a feeling Fed won't beat Djoko again at RG. In 2012, Djoko distanced himself from Fed on red clay imo.
How do you come up with this crap? 2010 and 2011 yes. 2012, no. Not at all.
Murray was in the last 3 grandslam finals, where was Rafalito?
Exactly. Of course Federer always has a chance against Djokovic at Wimbledon, until he is no longer a top 5 caliber player, in fact atleast 7 or 8 guys have a decent shot vs Djokovic on grass, which is why his win at Wimbledon 2011 was so remarkable, and why winning the Grand Slam which would have to include both his first RG and a Wimbledon title would be so amazing if he achieved. However most outside of overzealous Fed fanboys agree a repeat of the 2011 RG upset is highly unlikely to ever happen again. Federer deserved his win there and IMO it wasnt even that big an upset at the time (Djokovic had won only 2 majors, he wasnt really confirmed as the new dominant player until he won Wimbleodn). Federer is now going onwards into his 30s (he wasnt even 30 yet at the time of that match) and clay is not a surface that rewards age, and Djokovic is only growing in confidence on clay all the time. Furthermore Djokovic is 6-1 vs Federer on slow surfaces dating way back to starting in 2009 (when Federer was only 27 and Djokovic nowhere near his prime form), which indicates the 2011 RG result was a lightning in bottle kind of thing at this stage of Federer's career.
He admitted that Fed could beat him at W which you agree with. I also have a feeling Fed won't beat Djoko again at RG. In 2012, Djoko distanced himself from Fed on red clay imo.
Actually Djokovic`s level on clay was considerable superior in 2011 compared to 2012. So in a way he went backwards. If Fed had beat him at RG 2012, it would be less of an upset than their 2011 encounter (Djoko was in the form of his life previous of that match). In 2012 he was pushed to 5 sets by Seppi and Tsonga (who choked that match badly) , so i fail to see how on earth is Fed hopeless against Djoko in RG. It is true that he was beaten hard in their last match at RG, but Fed had his chances so it wasn`t a one way affair. In their Rome match Fed couldn`t hit a forehand to save his ass and he pushed Nole to a tiebreak. If he is in form he has a decent shot. I give him about 30% chances of victory depending on the draw, injuries, etc. It could be more (for example if Djoko has to go trough Nadal first) or less if Fed is pushed hard in his previous matches. After all, nobody thought possible that he could beat Nadal ever again on a slow, high bouncing court and he toyed with him at IW last year.
Actually Djokovic`s level on clay was considerable superior in 2011 compared to 2012. So in a way he went backwards. If Fed had beat him at RG 2012, it would be less of an upset than their 2011 encounter (Djoko was in the form of his life previous of that match). In 2012 he was pushed to 5 sets by Seppi and Tsonga (who choked that match badly) , so i fail to see how on earth is Fed hopeless against Djoko in RG. It is true that he was beaten hard in their last match at RG, but Fed had his chances so it wasn`t a one way affair. In their Rome match Fed couldn`t hit a forehand to save his ass and he pushed Nole to a tiebreak. If he is in form he has a decent shot. I give him about 30% chances of victory depending on the draw, injuries, etc. It could be more (for example if Djoko has to go trough Nadal first) or less if Fed is pushed hard in his previous matches. After all, nobody thought possible that he could beat Nadal ever again on a slow, high bouncing court and he toyed with him at IW last year.
We will see what happens but all I can say is I totally disagree with you on 30% for Federer beating Djokovic at RG. 30% is what I would give Federer to beat Djokovic at Wimbledon or the U.S Open at this point (well a bit more than 30 at Wimbledon, and a bit less at the U.S Open). French and Australian Open would be nowhere near that at this point IMO. It would be a huge upset if Federer beats Djokovic in a slow court slam ever again.
don't be so sure why so aggresive attitude?
And WTF. And 2 of the last 4 masters
And WTF. And 2 of the last 4 masters
What did Nadal win?
Yeah, He Boss
Nadal will win Clay Slam in South America
It depends heavily on Rafa. If Rafa returns healthy and fit, Novak has to wait for another year.
And it's too early to talk about CYGS at this moment. Bookmark this and come back after FO.
What about 2014?