He gets asked these questions all the time. I dont know how he has the patience to answer the same **** all over again. All he can do is answer, and answers truthfully. He is not Nadal who would say "slam race? To be perfectly honest, I don't even know how many I have".
All aboard the TT merry-go-round:Can’t believe this thread made it to 4 pages, jesus
You have to really try to find something wrong with his comments.
All aboard the TT merry-go-round:
I’m not 100% sure, but I think she’s riding that wrong...Oh my God....
Pete retired well before Fed won anything of note.
Pete retired after Federer won his first Wimbledon.
Hi, do you have any comment on Pete Sampras claim that Novak Djokovic is GOAT?Yes Djokovic wants to be in front and bent over.
LmaoHi, do you have any comment on Pete Sampras claim that Novak Djokovic is GOAT?
Pete retired after Federer won his first Wimbledon.
Mmm...let's see...Us Open final 2002 vs. Wimbledon Final 2003...i wonder which one happened later...
While he announced his formal retirement at the 2003 USO, Pete played his last pro match at the USO 2002 final. FEDR won his first W title in 2003.
Yes, so when we announce retirement is when we actually retire. Even Federer is still not retired, he will retire much later. You cannot say that Federer retired before Medvedev won his first slam.
You can't really chase seomeone anymore, when that person is not actively playing anymore...can you?...
Yes, so when we announce retirement is when we actually retire...
Have you noticed that since losing the RG final, there has been a steady media churn continuing the narrative that he will invevatibaly break the record? I really do think there is a PR agency behind the constant Novak news and narrative building (big difference between having a publicist and contracting with a full agency, in case anyone is wondering). And it makes sense--he's the one out of the three with the biggest reputation holes, the biggest PR weaknesses. I own my own PR firm, and to me, whatever that's worth, this looks like a PR entity driving the message home constantly. Why Novak would decide on that? Well, we know he desperately wants to be loved. So maybe he thinks a constant drum beat of attention is the way. I tend to think its the opposite of what he needs. He started to grow his fanbase the most in the early going of his 2018 comeback, when he and his coaches weren't constantly driving headlines and his on court behavior was calmer and not obnoxious.
Yes. Sampras is very jealous of Federer. Nuff said, no?Hi, do you have any comment on Pete Sampras claim that Novak Djokovic is GOAT?
That's all you have to say on Pete Sampras claim that Novak Djokovic is GOAT?Yes. Sampras is very jealous of Federer. Nuff said, no?
So if you never formally announce your retirement then you never retire? I'm going with substance over form. You retired when you played your last pro match.
Yes. Sampras is very jealous of Federer. Nuff said, no?
Interesting that you don’t see the irony.Federer was prematurely decalred as GOAT by the media.
Interesting that you don’t see the irony.
…
Now what if Nadal announces retirement tomorrow? Will we say Med won his slam after Fedal retired? When an athlete is hopeful to make a comeback on some months then he is not retired....
What Irony? Are you suggesting that Novak now is declared prematurely like Fed was?
Reality is that Fed never sealed the GOAT debate, even in his peak Nadal was giving him problems and there were talks of Nadal being Young enough to chase Roger's record of slams. ..also Fed's dominance was punctured by Nadal even before Fed broke Pete's record ( W08 loss, AO09 loss, crying at presentation nd what not ).
Then Novak had also beaten Fed at AO08, the year 2010 went to Nadal and 2011 went to Novak who usurped it from Nadal, Fed was watching this happen infront of his eyes and he wasn't done physically but he was already relegated to 3rd best by his 2 young opponents. Being relegated to 3rd position should have happened in 2015-2016 period and not in 2011, So Federer had no option but to continue because physically he was still right up there but he had became 3rd, no GOAT ever suffers such a plight. Then we all know what happened from 2011 till 2020, the whole decade belonged to Novak and Fed watched his records break even before his retirement.
This all suggests that Fed being called GOAT was premature.
We will see what happens but at this point Djokovic is the massive favourite to win the slam record and have most the other big records which he already has. Fed is finished and only Rafa can do anything about it but it feels like it’s probably clay or bust for him now. He has to win FO 2022 or that might be it for him so big pressure.interesting so you know what will happen in 2022 2023 and so on. If Nadal ends up with more slams, Djokovic will never be undisputed Goat no matter how many other records he holds .
interesting so you know what will happen in 2022 2023 and so on. If Nadal ends up with more slams, Djokovic will never be undisputed Goat no matter how many other records he holds .
There‘s the irony again. In all probability. Give me a break. Show me the calculations you used to arrive at these probabilities. Most likely they were pulled out of your azz.If Novak can't then Rafa can't either .
We shall see what happens in next 2-3 years..
In all probability NovK will cross 25 with ease.
He was also favourite to win AO2017We will see what happens but at this point Djokovic is the massive favourite to win the slam record and have most the other big records which he already has. Fed is finished and only Rafa can do anything about it but it feels like it’s probably clay or bust for him now. He has to win FO 2022 or that might be it for him so big pressure.
Google translate...
"If you're a professional competitor, you have to have goals, something to strive for. You have to have mental peace. You need to work on something and set goals for yourself on a daily basis, short-term and long-term. For me, the two biggest long-term goals are to have the most Grand Slam titles in the history of tennis and the second to be the number one player in the history of sports for the longest time ", admitted Djokovic.
"I'm very close to achieving that other goal as well. Federer and Nadal are still playing, still winning slams. They're amazing, but I'm still fighting and that's fine. Even if I don't, it will be fine, but I have to have something that will move me"
He also added that he has no problem saying what he thinks, when it comes to that race.
"I have no problem verbalizing what I think, that's what we do. Whoever is at the top, and he doesn't talk about it, I wouldn't believe him to be completely honest," Djokovic concluded.
There‘s the irony again. In all probability. Give me a break. Show me the calculations you used to arrive at these probabilities. Most likely they were pulled out of your azz.
Istomin had done nothing to Novak before AO2017. What would logic tell you about the outcome of that R2 match?The calculations that I used is simple logic
Federer has been unable to do anything to Novak in Slams for close to a decade.
Nadal has tried to break Novak's spirit on Clay since 06 and failed, Novak is 2-1 vs Nadal at Roland Garros in the last 6 years and also is the defending champion nd reigning world number 1.
Plus Novak has the highest winning % ever for any player vs guys younger to him, it must be close to 95%.
These are massive numbers, tells us volumes on how complete a player he is and how much ahead he is of the pack. Unless his win% starts to drop vs those younger to him, we cannot expect the old guns to stop him. In reality there is a big question mark on Rafa right now, the next gen are already here, Novak is here, in all fairness Rafa has no frenchs left in him or maybe at best 1 french in him
Istomin had done nothing to Novak before AO2017. What would logic tell you about the outcome of that R2 match?
Avoiding the question is the best indication of defeat. Thank you.Everything that Federer has done till now in terms of Longevity will also be beaten by Djokovic, including the modern record for oldest slam winner at 36, wait and watch, that is also coming.
By the time Novak retires Federer's numbers will look really ordinary and more people will doubt the actual level of Federer's peak of 04-07
Pete retired well before Fed won anything of note.
Yeah but Fed hardly chased him considering he was retired in 2002.He retired after Fed won his first Wimbledon.
Yeah but Fed hardly chased him considering he was retired in 2002.
I’m one Djokovic fan that defends Fed 04-07 yes the competition wasn’t the strongest but he literally trashed everyone. But Fed didn’t have many ATG as Sampras was gone, Nadal was a baby that wasn’t yet elite off Clay. Also Nadal being tough and winning Wimbledon and AO was Fed’s fault for letting him. Nadal shouldn’t be beating a mid 20’s Fed at his 2 best slamsDeities don't need to bother with chasing anyone.
I’m one Djokovic fan that defends Fed 04-07 yes the competition wasn’t the strongest but he literally trashed everyone. But Fed didn’t have many ATG as Sampras was gone, Nadal was a baby that wasn’t yet elite off Clay. Also Nadal being tough and winning Wimbledon and AO was Fed’s fault for letting him. Nadal shouldn’t be beating a mid 20’s Fed at his 2 best slams
It's like saying that Nadal shouldn't be beating a mid 20s Novak in the USO Final.As I said on other occasions, Nadal carried the momentum after destroying Fed at RG, in 2008, plus he played very well and Fed wasn't supposed to win them all.I mean, he had to lose a hardcourt slam final at one point and a Wimbledon match as well; nobody has won 6 in a row at a slam.I still don't understand why so many people hold it against Fed for those 2 matches and that including some of his fansI’m one Djokovic fan that defends Fed 04-07 yes the competition wasn’t the strongest but he literally trashed everyone. But Fed didn’t have many ATG as Sampras was gone, Nadal was a baby that wasn’t yet elite off Clay. Also Nadal being tough and winning Wimbledon and AO was Fed’s fault for letting him. Nadal shouldn’t be beating a mid 20’s Fed at his 2 best slams
Yeah the 2013 F lose Djokovic shouldn’t be losing but the USO isn’t Djokovic best or even 2nd best slam.It's like saying that Nadal shouldn't be beating a mid 20s Novak in the USO Final.As I said on other occasions, Nadal carried the momentum after destroying Fed at RG, in 2008, plus he played very well and Fed wasn't supposed to win them all.I mean, he had to lose a hardcourt slam final at one point and an Wimbledon match as well; nobody has won 6 in a row at a slam
I feel W08 and AO09 are loses that shouldn’t of happened but 2019 was way more heartbreaking and painfulYes, Wimby 08 and AO 09 pissed me off big time back in the day. Now they feel minor compared with Wimby 19.
My point is not centered on that hypothetical age swap amyway and you have some good points there.Yeah the 2013 F lose Djokovic shouldn’t be losing but the USO isn’t Djokovic best or even 2nd best slam.
Nadal has 3 slams combined at AO/W and in 2 of them he beat Fed as a 21/22 year old kid. As I said before if Fed and Djokovic swapped places/age Fed wouldn’t lose to Wawrinka like Djokovic did but also Djokovic doesn’t lose to young Nadal at AO or W.
My main point is that yeah now Nadal challenging Prime Fed looks more impressive because Fed gave him the slams. Fed won most of his slams when Nadal wasn’t around or when Nadal wasn’t great off clay.
Anyway what I’m trying to say it would still balance if you change ages. Djokovic would dominate 04-08 but would have a few more upsets than Fed did as Fed was ruthless but Djokovic would have better success against Nadal and would be more successful post 08 than Fed was
2010 Nadal was just simply a better player than Djokovic. It doesn’t really count in my argument as Djokovic pre 2011 is nowhere near the level he got too and it was.My point is not centered on that hypothetical age swap amyway and you have some good points there.
Where I want to focus the convo is that Nadal also won 2 of his USO titles by beating Djokovic and considering that hardcourts are Serb's favorite surface, he should have not allowed Nadal to beat him in the finals, so he is also guilty like Fed no ? I mean, you can't simply dismiss that by saying that the USO is not one of Novak's favorite slams because it should have been one of his best slam taking into consideration how many finals he has reached there.So, Nadal won one AO and one Wimbledon with Fed in the finals, but he also won 2 USOs with Djokovic in the finals.You can't blame Fed more for allowing the Bull to win.
Had both not allowed Nadal to win those matches, he wouldn't be in the GOAT conversation now.So, Fedovic failed somehow here or Nadal's level was just too good and he deserved to win those matches in order to be in the position he is now ? I think it's the second option
What Djokovic has over Fed is this case is that he denied Nadal at his best slam, while Fed lost that 2008 Wimbledon so I'll give him that, but my point of view expressed above still stands.
Fair enough2010 Nadal was just simply a better player than Djokovic. It doesn’t really count in my argument as Djokovic pre 2011 is nowhere near the level he got too and it was.
Yes both failed in places they shouldn’t but I always feel that Djokovic does better from 2004-2018 if put in Fed’s position. Fed from 04-07 was so ruthless you put any player in history at their peak or not and they do worse but Djokovic would be better over 10 years I feel.
For me Nadal is the highest level when it’s a one of match(Clay)
Fed is the highest level over 3/4 years
Djokovic is the highest level over 10+ years.
All are great in their own way
Djokovic: .I want to be in front of Nadal and Federer...
....Nadal didn't blinked in the 5th set in the 2008 Wimbledon Final, while he blinked on the 5th set of the 2012 AO Final and I think that should count for something.
Well not looking good for him now is it. Tied on majors but less Olympic golds than Nadal and less WTF than Federer.
Not sure having more m1000s will satisfy him. To not surpass Nadal and Federer by defeats to Zverev and Medvedev in three consecutive events is going to sting for many years as i doubt either become ATGs.
For me Nadal is the highest level when it’s a one of match(Clay)
Fed is the highest level over 3/4 years
Djokovic is the highest level over 10+ years.
All are great in their own way