Djokovic - Losing yet another opportunity !

ND-13

Hall of Fame
Can never get a better draw than this and still lost a set. Same case at Wimb earlier.

Will he win a major without dropping a set in the next year ? Both Federer and Nadal managed it !!
 

messiahrobins

Hall of Fame
Can never get a better draw than this and still lost a set. Same case at Wimb earlier.

Will he win a major without dropping a set in the next year ? Both Federer and Nadal managed it !!
Will obviously win tonight but doubthe wins thr event as conditions too slow for him. Wont surprise me if we see an american winner, and i dont rate the us players.
 

ChrisJR3264

Hall of Fame
Agree but such is life in america right now an american us open winner may be a great distraction from impeachment talk etc....
An American is not winning the men’s tourney. Fritz will choke. I like Paul but I don’t think he can make it deep.
Now maybe a finalist - if Novak drops tonight.
But the other side of the draw will be Carlos, sinner, or medvedev. And I wouldn’t put any American as a favorite to beat either of those 3
 

ND-13

Hall of Fame
I hope and wish he can win AO 24 of Wimb 24 without losing sets .

It is a blot that you achieve most majors yet cannot win even once in a comprehensive fashion without losing a set when others have shown it can be done .
 

Djokovic2011

Bionic Poster
I hope and wish he can win AO 24 of Wimb 24 without losing sets .

It is a blot that you achieve most majors yet cannot win even once in a comprehensive fashion without losing a set when others have shown it can be done .
Are you being serious? :unsure:
 

Hitman

Bionic Poster
And if he does do it, then we can go the other way....

Look, Djokovic couldn't win in straights before, but manages to do it at 36 years of age. Career inflation era in full throttle. Vulture. Fake GOAT.
 

SonnyT

Legend
Nadal has 1 win (at '22 AO in which Djokovic was absent) at AO & WB since '10. That was why Djokovic dominated those slams, because Nadal didn't put up a fight worthy of ATG's.

Djokovic almost always puts up a fight at RG. And he got 9 finals at USO.
 

GoatNo1

Professional
what, this shocked me a lot. I think Nole won't be able to sleep because of this missed opportunity.

he doesn't know how to do anything properly:
- he won a record number of slams but lost a set in each
- he has 2 golden masters and 3 career slams, but not a single golden slam, and he barely won the channel slam
- has a record time at the top of the list, but not consecutively and not in the top 10
- has a record consecutive streak of Slam wins and Slams won, but not in the same season
- has the strongest winning streak in history, but it was interrupted by the second biggest rival
- has the most big titles in a season and a season with 3+ slams but no W% in the same season
- has the best W% in history but did not finish his career
- he has the most big titles and top 5 and 10 wins, but he played for too long
- has a positive h2h with all main rivals, but loses from rafa at RG
- he won the most big titles, but against old main rivals but also he won the most big titles, but against immature kids as his main rivals
 

ND-13

Hall of Fame
I am sure Nadal and Federer would trade this meaningless stat for a couple more lost-sets slams

They have 20 and above.. I am sure they like to have something special in addition.

It is not that Djokovic does not have his own records.. But this shows he has not been dominating when winning a major.
 

SonnyT

Legend
Who cares? Only Fedfans think winning without dropping a set is SO important.

That just shows level of Federer's opposition back in the dark days of the 00's.
 

Rosstour

G.O.A.T.
Winning a GS without losing a set sounds great but in grand scheme of things means absolutely zilch. It is still one solitary GS and you don't get a 2 for 1 deal or bonus points for not dropping a set

lol, it was plenty meaningful when Rafa did it
 

ND-13

Hall of Fame
Who cares? Only Fedfans think winning without dropping a set is SO important.

That just shows level of Federer's opposition back in the dark days of the 00's.

This Djoko fan cares. It is not the end of the world as he has so many other records but this is an important one to be missing in the shelf
 

Fabresque

Legend
Can never get a better draw than this and still lost a set. Same case at Wimb earlier.

Will he win a major without dropping a set in the next year ? Both Federer and Nadal managed it !!
This is so irrelevant though. A slam isn’t stricken from the record because you dropped a set LOL. And im sure Fedal would trade away every single one of those slams they won without dropping a set, if they ended up with more slams than Djokovic.
 

ND-13

Hall of Fame
This is so irrelevant though. A slam isn’t stricken from the record because you dropped a set LOL. And im sure Fedal would trade away every single one of those slams they won without dropping a set, if they ended up with more slams than Djokovic.

It is not one or the other.

They managed to accomplish 20+ majors and win few without dropping sets
 

dr325i

G.O.A.T.
I looooove how people write them (not only Novak but the big 3, before it is over (note: I used to do that for all 3, but learned my lesson)).
This is not Novak's first time, in fact, almost every successful tournament he went through had one of these matches.
Also, Djere played lights out last night, and it worked well in first two sets... Most other players would have not figured out how to turn it around, come back and win. That is what makes only a few ones so strong, mentally, physically and tactically...
 

TMF

Talk Tennis Guru
Things you learn at TTW...

any impressive feat that Djokovic has never achieved, it's meaningless
 

Fabresque

Legend
Things you learn at TTW...

any impressive feat that Djokovic has never achieved, it's meaningless
It’s not that it’s meaningless, it’s the fact it holds less merit than other things.

An Olympic Gold Medal doesn’t hold more merit than the slam lead. Winning a slam without dropping a set doesn’t hold more merit than winning every single masters tournament.

It just doesn’t, and the reality is that while he may have some rough patches on his resume, it’s still way better than Federer and Nadal.
 

ND-13

Hall of Fame
It’s not that it’s meaningless, it’s the fact it holds less merit than other things.

An Olympic Gold Medal doesn’t hold more merit than the slam lead. Winning a slam without dropping a set doesn’t hold more merit than winning every single masters tournament.

It just doesn’t, and the reality is that while he may have some rough patches on his resume, it’s still way better than Federer and Nadal.

Way better ?? That is not true.

No Olympic gold medal
No doubles prowess
No majors without losing sets.
Lopsided resume ( 6/39 : 17/31)

Above are facts we fans have to accept
 

NonP

Legend
Can never get a better draw than this and still lost a set. Same case at Wimb earlier.

Will he win a major without dropping a set in the next year ? Both Federer and Nadal managed it !!
Nobody in the entire OE has managed to win a USO without dropping a set. And no OE champ but Rosewall the longevity GOAT has won it after turning 35 years of age.

The USO is the most difficult of all majors to dominate for a reason. And that's especially true for geriatrics like the current 36-year-old Djokovic. Groupies that have already penciled in his 4th USO or at least Djoker vs. Carlitos have no clue what they're talking about.

Winning a GS without losing a set sounds great but in grand scheme of things means absolutely zilch. It is still one solitary GS and you don't get a 2 for 1 deal or bonus points for not dropping a set
Frankly it does suggest that his peak isn't as high as Borg's or Fraud's (or Bull's on dirt, obviously), given that his percentage game is virtually designed to make the most out of his opponents' errors aka to dominate the numbers game.

But yeah, peak is definitely overrated in the grand scheme of things. Consistency is its own kind of peak and Djoker excels at it arguably better than anyone else past or present.
 

NeutralFan

G.O.A.T.
Nadal has 1 win (at '22 AO in which Djokovic was absent) at AO & WB since '10. That was why Djokovic dominated those slams, because Nadal didn't put up a fight worthy of ATG's.

Djokovic almost always puts up a fight at RG. And he got 9 finals at USO.

Who played a 5 setter at AO against peak Djokoer? Peak Djokoer didn't do much better against peak /prime Nadal at FO than Nadal did against him at AO.
 
Top