Will obviously win tonight but doubthe wins thr event as conditions too slow for him. Wont surprise me if we see an american winner, and i dont rate the us players.Can never get a better draw than this and still lost a set. Same case at Wimb earlier.
Will he win a major without dropping a set in the next year ? Both Federer and Nadal managed it !!
I certainly don’t trust Fritz. Tiafoe has the most talent but both are not reliable players in my opinionWill obviously win tonight but doubthe wins thr event as conditions too slow for him. Wont surprise me if we see an american winner, and i dont rate the us players.
Agree but such is life in america right now an american us open winner may be a great distraction from impeachment talk etc....I certainly don’t trust Fritz. Tiafoe has the most talent but both are not reliable players in my opinion
Its not that hot today. Next week they are saying will be brutalDoes Novak seem to be bothered by the conditions? Weather wise- it’s bothered many folks. Humidity factor?
An American is not winning the men’s tourney. Fritz will choke. I like Paul but I don’t think he can make it deep.Agree but such is life in america right now an american us open winner may be a great distraction from impeachment talk etc....
Are you being serious?I hope and wish he can win AO 24 of Wimb 24 without losing sets .
It is a blot that you achieve most majors yet cannot win even once in a comprehensive fashion without losing a set when others have shown it can be done .
If it's so meaningless, why are you so bothered?I am sure Nadal and Federer would trade this meaningless stat for a couple more lost-sets slams
I am sure Nadal and Federer would trade this meaningless stat for a couple more lost-sets slams
That 1 win was before Plexi too.Fedal combined have 1 win against Djokovic at his best slam - AO
Fedal combined have 1 win against Djokovic at his best slam - AO
Djo has 5 wins against Fedal at their best slams - RG and Wimbledon.
I'm sure he sleeps well.
Winning a GS without losing a set sounds great but in grand scheme of things means absolutely zilch. It is still one solitary GS and you don't get a 2 for 1 deal or bonus points for not dropping a set
Who cares? Only Fedfans think winning without dropping a set is SO important.
That just shows level of Federer's opposition back in the dark days of the 00's.
This is so irrelevant though. A slam isn’t stricken from the record because you dropped a set LOL. And im sure Fedal would trade away every single one of those slams they won without dropping a set, if they ended up with more slams than Djokovic.Can never get a better draw than this and still lost a set. Same case at Wimb earlier.
Will he win a major without dropping a set in the next year ? Both Federer and Nadal managed it !!
This is so irrelevant though. A slam isn’t stricken from the record because you dropped a set LOL. And im sure Fedal would trade away every single one of those slams they won without dropping a set, if they ended up with more slams than Djokovic.
It’s not that it’s meaningless, it’s the fact it holds less merit than other things.Things you learn at TTW...
any impressive feat that Djokovic has never achieved, it's meaningless
It’s not that it’s meaningless, it’s the fact it holds less merit than other things.
An Olympic Gold Medal doesn’t hold more merit than the slam lead. Winning a slam without dropping a set doesn’t hold more merit than winning every single masters tournament.
It just doesn’t, and the reality is that while he may have some rough patches on his resume, it’s still way better than Federer and Nadal.
Nobody in the entire OE has managed to win a USO without dropping a set. And no OE champ but Rosewall the longevity GOAT has won it after turning 35 years of age.Can never get a better draw than this and still lost a set. Same case at Wimb earlier.
Will he win a major without dropping a set in the next year ? Both Federer and Nadal managed it !!
Frankly it does suggest that his peak isn't as high as Borg's or Fraud's (or Bull's on dirt, obviously), given that his percentage game is virtually designed to make the most out of his opponents' errors aka to dominate the numbers game.Winning a GS without losing a set sounds great but in grand scheme of things means absolutely zilch. It is still one solitary GS and you don't get a 2 for 1 deal or bonus points for not dropping a set
Neither does anyone else, including the players themselves. Fritz, Paul or Tiafoe winning this slam is <2% likelihood. I do think Shelton will have a good chance to beat Tommy tomorrow.Wont surprise me if we see an american winner, and i dont rate the us players.
Hope so as shelton onNeither does anyone else, including the players themselves. Fritz, Paul or Tiafoe winning this slam is <2% likelihood. I do think Shelton will have a good chance to beat Tommy tomorrow.
Nadal has 1 win (at '22 AO in which Djokovic was absent) at AO & WB since '10. That was why Djokovic dominated those slams, because Nadal didn't put up a fight worthy of ATG's.
Djokovic almost always puts up a fight at RG. And he got 9 finals at USO.