I am an equalist, regardless of a lady, or man, or anyone, if someone is in the wrong place then things happen as collateral damage. She was extremely unfit and with bad reflexes, so that happened with her and she was overreacting as well. Djokovic's intent was not violent in any way, unlike the Nalbandian or Shapovalo DQs, those were legit and well deserved because the players were violent and at fault. Novak got punished for no reason, I am pretty sure Federer would have got away with it. There have been occasions in the past when Federer hit ball boys on their head and smiled at them with swag, can you imagine Novak doing that ? Now imagine if instead of the ball boy if Roger had hit the lineswoman? Pretty the woman would have shrug it off and told the match referee that it is not Roger's fault. Roger has the charm to make people take the blame for some unfortunate accident on themselves and Novak lacks the charm in his personality, so that can make people actually shift blame on him for an accident. I really hate that woman, her face is vivid on my mind and I blame her entirely for it. This has nothing to do with Novak personally, had this been Fed or Nadal then my response towards her would have been the same. She was just careless and someone else paid the price for it. Djokovic's intent was not violent like Nalbandian/Shapovalov's was. I hope the authorities sacked her from the job, she is just not fit to be a lineswoman.,.... period!