NoleIsBoat
Hall of Fame
Remind me when did I disrespect Fed or Nadal?Sure pal, as soon as you will show more respect to Fed & Nadal.
Remember all those vulturing posts?
Remind me when did I disrespect Fed or Nadal?Sure pal, as soon as you will show more respect to Fed & Nadal.
Remember all those vulturing posts?
Remind me when did I disrespect Fed or Nadal?
What if someone had told you in 2010 that Djoker would be at 20 and Rafa would be at 13 at Roland Garros.
At the end of 2010:
Federer: 16
Nadal: 9
Djokovic:1
10.5 years later:
Federer: 20
Nadal: 20
Djokovic:20
How much has Novak won from 2010-2021 -- 19 slams and counting! Unbelievable.
I won’t apologise for being accurate. Fed won slams in 09 and 17 that he previously lost to Nadal, then Djokovic. Opportunistereryou can troll better than this pal
check your history of posts where you abused the word 'vulture'
and if you want to have a meaningful discussion, make an effort to be a reasonable poster
I won’t apologise for being accurate. Fed won slams in 09 and 17 that he previously lost to Nadal, then Djokovic. Opportunisterer
But you aren't accurate, you are stating your opinion. We can't check who had it tougher in different eras.I won’t apologise for being accurate. Fed won slams in 09 and 17 that he previously lost to Nadal, then Djokovic. Opportunisterer
- Federer lost 08RG, 08W, 09AO final to Nadal, reduced to tearsBut you aren't accurate, you are stating your opinion. We can't check who had it tougher in different eras.
We simply don't know. You need to learn the difference between opinions or facts.
Nadal lost to Soderling, so why are you so sure Fed would still lose to him?- Federer lost 08RG, 08W, 09AO final to Nadal, reduced to tears
- Federer won 09RG, 09W and 10AO without facing Nadal.
What’s inaccurate about any of that? The guy is the master opportunist I will give him that
So since 2021 Djokovic has a weak era? About time he had some weak draws. For most of his slams he defeated some of the top 3 ranked players and big 4 members.P.S.
It's as well an accurate assessment that Djokovic thrives based on one of the weakest era in tennis
nothing to apologize for
just facts
The empirical evidence suggests he would. Nadal won the real life RG matches 6-0, 14-2 overall on clay.Nadal lost to Soderling, so why are you so sure Fed would still lose to him?
Ok, then are you also saying Nole's first FO was also opportunistic since he didn't beat Nadal?The empirical evidence suggests he would. Nadal won the real life RG matches 6-0, 14-2 overall on clay.
You could say that, but Nole has 2 wins over Nadal there so that argument holds less weight.Ok, then are you also saying Nole's first FO was also opportunistic since he didn't beat Nadal?
So since 2021 Djokovic has a weak era? About time he had some weak draws. For most of his slams he defeated some of the top 3 ranked players and big 4 members.
fed padded his stats with 11-12ish freebie slams between 03-07. Now it Novak’s turn
Since 2016 slams won without facing a well playing big 4 ->except that it is not 2021, it is 2016 - and still counting
so make your math who had it easier
Federer won something like 7-8 slams without facing an ATG. His usual SF/F included Roddick, Hewitt, Bagdhatis, Philippousis, Kiefer…right pal, cause pro tennis started in 2011, before that a typical main draw for a GS event would consist of Fed and 127 talk tennis amateurs
Federer won something like 7-8 slams without facing an ATG. His usual SF/F included Roddick, Hewitt, Bagdhatis, Philippousis, Kiefer…
Djokovic has a few weak slams to go before he reaches Federer levels of inflation.
1. Fed is the one who had Bagdhatis in a slam final. Weak opponent.lololol
1. Baghdatis belongs to the Djokodal generation, so if you want to call Baghdatis weak competition, then you are essentially calling Djokodal a weak generation, and that's end of any attempt to have a reasonable discussion with you
2. Roddick and Hewitt both reached #1 in ranking and actually won GS titles. So, this alone makes them stronger competition than all the players born after Djokodal that keep folding already in the locked room at the mere possibility to play Djokodal
3. if you think that 36-37 years old Fed is a stronker opposition than a young Hewitt and Roddick, well, you might consider seeking some professional services
1. Fed is the one who had Bagdhatis in a slam final. Weak opponent.
3. If you think any version of Roddick/Hewitt is better than 2015-2019 Federer, I suggest seek help for your delusion
So, are you saying Federer is not the same generation as Djokodal? This is what you are saying. How can Federer be the same generation as Djokodal but Fed's opponents are the same generation as Federer but not the same generation as Djokodal?1. Fed is the one who had Bagdhatis in a slam final. Weak opponent.
2. Yes at the present moment in time they’re weaker than Roddick/Hewitt. However if they reach number 1 and win slams later in career they become level and /or stronger. Reminder - they didn’t beat Federer for any of their slams.
3. If you think any version of Roddick/Hewitt is better than 2015-2019 Federer, I suggest seek help for your delusion
So, what’s your point? Fed had him in a slam final. The others didn’tirrelevant, he belongs to Djokodal generation
Yes and no. Federer accumulated majority of his stats in the vacuum 2003-2007 period, post Sampras and pre Nadal/Djokovic. He only won 7 slams going through a fellow big 3 playerSo, are you saying Federer is not the same generation as Djokodal? This is what you are saying. How can Federer be the same generation as Djokodal but Fed's opponents are the same generation as Federer but not the same generation as Djokodal?
Makes no sense to me.
So, what’s your point? Fed had him in a slam final. The others didn’t
Yes and no. Federer accumulated majority of his stats in the vacuum 2003-2007 period, post Sampras and pre Nadal/Djokovic. He only won 7 slams going through a fellow big 3 player
that's some tasty food for thought for some who think that form over name mantra always worksagain irrelevant
Nole faced Berrettini in the Wim final
Nole faced Thiem in AO final
Nole faced Tsitsipas in RG final
all 3 opponents defeated themselves
Doesn't matter since they aren't the same generation and wasn't in his peak. I can argue that post 2010 was a vaccuum without peak Federer. And let's face it Nadal was very inconsistent, he was away half of Nole's prime too.Yes and no. Federer accumulated majority of his stats in the vacuum 2003-2007 period, post Sampras and pre Nadal/Djokovic. He only won 7 slams going through a fellow big 3 player
Anderson followed Nadal in SF which was de facto final. Only ignorants would ignore this.Nole accumulated inflated stats in the weakest era, starting with 2018, having to face Berrettini, Thiem, Tsitsipas, Anderson, post-injury Del Po in the finals, which defeat themselves as soon as they see Nole on the other side of the net
and that period is still going
You could, but any respected tennis fan, historian or analyst would laugh at you.Doesn't matter since they aren't the same generation and wasn't in his peak. I can argue that post 2010 was a vaccuum without peak Federer. And let's face it Nadal was very inconsistent, he was away half of Nole's prime too.
So, the same logic can be used for Nole as well. Can't have it both ways no matter how much you want it.
Anderson followed Nadal in SF which was de facto final. Only ignorants would ignore this.
2018 USO was kinda weak
Thiem played awesome. Much better than some of Roddick’s efforts.
Berrerini was ok. Definitely better than anyone Fed faced in 2005 there at least.
Djokovic has a looooooong way to go before he reaches Federer level of stat padding.
Nole accumulated inflated stats in the weakest era, starting with 2018, having to face Berrettini, Thiem, Tsitsipas, Anderson, post-injury Del Po in the finals, which defeat themselves as soon as they see Nole on the other side of the net
and that period is still going
I do recall Roddick stumbling to the net like a buffoon and being passed at will. Berretini at least on a set and gave a fight. Hewitt or Roddick couldn’t even do that.I didn't know that Fed opponents in 2005 weren't able to drop shot or hit a FH down the line
You could, but any respected tennis fan, historian or analyst would laugh at you.
No era where the 3 best modern players ever are competing for slams, can be called a “vacuum” or weak era.
Whereas Nadal has major final wins over the likes of: Berdych, Anderson, Thiem, Puerta, Ferrer, Medvedev (who probably should have won that USO and he choked up a break in the 5th)
And Federer has had: Baghdatis, Phillipoussis, Fernando Gonzalez, and almost retired Agassi...
playing that game I could easily make Rafa and Fed sound pretty weak as well you see....when we know overall thats not the case.
Baghdatis belongs to the Djokodal generation
unless you are saying that Djokodal generation is weak, then you need to edit your statement
I do recall Roddick stumbling to the net like a buffoon and being passed at will. Berretini at least on a set and gave a fight. Hewitt or Roddick couldn’t even do that.
It is also interesting to do a tally for all tier 1 titles, not just slams, for the big 3.
I did it per season for convenience of comparison, meaning when I say 20 years old, I mean the end of the season when they turned 20: 2006 for Nadal, 2007 for Novak and 2001 for Fed.
I've defined tier 1 events as events giving 1,000 points or more, ie Masters, WTF and Slams. Special events like DC or Olympics are not included.
19: Nad 5 - Djo 2 - Fed 0
20: Nad 8 - Djo 2 - Fed 0
21: Nad 12 - Djo 6 - Fed 1
22: Nad 17 - Djo 7 - Fed 3
23: Nad 21 - Fed 10 - Djo 7
24: Nad 27 - Fed 16 - Djo 15
25: Nad 29 - Fed 24 - Djo 20
26: Nad 32 - Fed 30 - Djo 25
27: Nad 39 - Djo/Fed 31
28: Djo/Nad 41 - Fed 35
29: Djo 47 - Nad 41 - Fed 38
30: Djo 47 - Nad 42 - Fed 40
31: Djo 51 - Nad 46 - Fed 44
32: Djo 55 - Nad 50 - Fed 44
33: Djo 58 - Nad 54 - Fed 46
I'll stop here because Djoko turned 34 this year and the season is not over. Now this tally is extremely interesting because you can see that Fed has never led the tier 1 tally.
It's been all Nadal until 27 and then all Djoko from 29 onwards.
Even more interesting is the fact that Fed comes last in almost every year except for the middle ones (23 to 26)
Another argument toward Fed actually being the least impressive of the big 3.