Djokovic will get to 408 weeks at #1. Here's why

[MichelaDe]

In the next 35 weeks (until september)

#1 Djokovic defends 1.980 pts
#2 Alcaraz defends 6.370 pts
#3 Tsitsipas defends 3.750 pts
#4 Ruud defends 4.760 pts

Highly unlikely Djokovic loses it before reaching 400 weeks.

 

[itrium84]

I just wish he reaches 418 = 8 full years of domination = 209x2.

 

[jackson vile]

Wow, Federer lost his place even faster than Sampras

 

[Unseeded Player]

In the next 35 weeks (until september)

#1 Djokovic defends 1.980 pts
#2 Alcaraz defends 6.370 pts
#3 Tsitsipas defends 3.750 pts
#4 Ruud defends 4.760 pts

Highly unlikely Djokovic loses it before reaching 400 weeks.

Yes but that is only this year not included next.. Novak for sure is going above 400

 

[Bubcay]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1619662719002763266

 

[Razer]

Wow, Federer lost his place even faster than Sampras

Federer did not lose his place faster than Sampras.

Sampras at 37 was no longer the slams leader while Federer was 40+ when he was no longer slams leader

 

[Sampras-Bruguera 1993]

Federer probably could have prevented it from happening. But he did the old turtle head hide vs. Nadal/Djokovic

 

[I Am Finnish]

In the next 35 weeks (until september)

#1 Djokovic defends 1.980 pts
#2 Alcaraz defends 6.370 pts
#3 Tsitsipas defends 3.750 pts
#4 Ruud defends 4.760 pts

Highly unlikely Djokovic loses it before reaching 400 weeks.

What it tell us?

 

[Texas Tennis Fan]

In the next 35 weeks (until september)

#1 Djokovic defends 1.980 pts
#2 Alcaraz defends 6.370 pts
#3 Tsitsipas defends 3.750 pts
#4 Ruud defends 4.760 pts

Highly unlikely Djokovic loses it before reaching 400 weeks.

Yes, there is possibility that he might lose it for a few weeks and then gain it back ESPECIALLY if Wi points count this year. But overall agree with your assessment.

 

[BGod]

Wow, Federer lost his place even faster than Sampras

Federer did not lose his place faster than Sampras.

Sampras at 37 was no longer the slams leader while Federer was 40+ when he was no longer slams leader

For just weeks at #1, Federer passed Sampras after near 13 years while Fed held the record for just over 8 and a half.

Meanwhile the Slam record was Pete's for 9 years and Fed's for 12 and a half.

 

[NAS]

For just weeks at #1, Federer passed Sampras after near 13 years while Fed held the record for just over 8 and a half.

Meanwhile the Slam record was Pete's for 9 years and Fed's for 12 and a half.

Sampras had the record for 9 years outright solo( he got the record in 2000Wimbledon) and 10 years if you count one year as joint holder.
But in open era Sampras got out right record in 99 Wimbledon so 10 years and 11 years as joint record holder .

 

[NAS]

In open era Borg hold the I think 21 years as most slam record holder( he got the record in 1978 Wimbledon)

 

[T007]

Wow, Federer lost his place even faster than Sampras

Career inflation mug era ..anything can happen

 

[Holmes]

Wow, Federer lost his place even faster than Sampras

Federer didn't even get to be the best of his era, unlike Sampras.