Didn’t see this match, but it did get mentioned in tennis magazines in the 80s, so I’ve known about it for some time.
I followed tennis pretty closely in the 80s, and while I appreciate all great champions from any era I do find it a bit odd how often posters here(many of whom don’t seem to have been following the game that long) sort of put down Serena and women’s tennis today when comparing it to the Martina/Evert/Graf era. Having watched a lot of tennis in the 80s(a lot of it live) I can say with some confidence that the quality of play in women’s tennis today from lower ranked players is much higher today to say the least. Moonballing was almost the norm for the majority of the women’s tour circa 1984. I sat through many of these matches with endless 50/60 ball rallies at the USO(hoping the matches would end so I could see men’s tennis) and believe me, it wasn’t fun. And the media was well aware of the poor quality of play, Chris and Martina had many press conferences where they were pretty much defending women’s tennis. While Graf and others certainly upped the bar, there were still a lot of moonballers in the late 80s/early 90s(and oddly these types of players weren’t exactly the most fit looking people. Cramping was a common thing back then. While it wasn’t nice of Krajicek to call women’s tennis full of fat pigs in 1992, many back then certainly don’t look that fit compared to most players today). So when you read Martina(who I’m a fan of, but can be objective about her era) went 83-1 in 1983, and see how often Martina, Graf, andEvert beat players 6-1, 6-1, keep in mind how many of the players they beat played like the 2 ladies in your post. I wonder what all the young posters here who constantly rip WTA today and say it’s unwatchable would think of having to watch a WTA event from beginning to end circa 1984. Watching a classic Chris Martina final on YouTube from then really doesn’t show the whole picture.
And going back to Jean Hepner, I came across an article about her match in the first round of the 83 USO(the article was more about her opponent since she came back from 06, 05, 0-40 in the quailies to win)
Score of this match was 61, 67, 63 and the match was 4 hours long with many rallies over 90 shots. I know that seems like a cake walk compared to the Richmond match, but I think it shows a pattern to how Hepner played and that the crazy stats about Richmond are probably correct.