Does Fed really use the RF97? Isn't he still using his old racquet with a painjob. For which Fabfed gives the specs for?
It's not possible unless the racquet is under specIt's the exact same frame as the retail RF97. Then P1 customizes it. No magic or mystery behind it.
It's not possible unless the racquet is under spec
Nope. This is one of several pics from a private auction of federer's own match sticks.It's very possible .... and true.
That alone is a modification that renders the racquet's waranty useless. .
Did you look at the pic i posted?Unbelievable. This is still going on??? Fed uses the exact same frame you can by. The P1 does a little grip work and lead work. That's it. Can we all move on now?
Did you even look at the pictures I posted? Lmao. It's not an average racquet. If less than 10% of the racquets being sold can be made to match his specifications, then the racquet being sold is not an accurate representation of what fed's using.Roger is not too worried about the warranty
I have several retail ProStaff frames that have hand the handle mould custom made. They are still the retail racquet with after-market modifications. Just like Roger's. I have some pretty solid sources on this
Did you look at the pic i posted?
How do you go from stock weight of 357 on average, to 359g with a 350+ swing weight, and overgrip.
How much do you get paid to post stuff like that?
Did you even look at the pictures I posted? Lmao. It's not an average racquet. If less than 10% of the racquets being sold can be made to match his specifications, then the racquet being sold is not an accurate representation of what fed's using.
Just like on the 90.
TT can be like arguing with inn-animate objects.
And PeterFig has just bit of inside info too - lol.
Except when I worked at TW what I was told doesn't reflect that at all. So I don't really believe you at all.Yes. I looked at the pic. 359 is right on spec with OG. And how do you know SW first of all?
I don't get paid at all or work for anyone. I've just actually been around the industry and tennis and a high level for quite a while and know how this stuff goes. Was around a bit when various specs were being tried out etc too. And PeterFig has just bit of inside info too - lol.
Don't buy it for a second. See my other post.The two things I can tell you:
1. I do not know what exact customizations P1 does to his RF97
2. I do know the starting point is a retail RF97 exactly the same as you can buy here on TW
Don't buy it for a second. See my other post.
Right, because I didn't work for tennis warehouse, and didn't ask those directly in contact with P1. Mhm.I think I'll have to take my knowledge and experience over your post
Right, because I didn't work for tennis warehouse, and didn't ask paul reed all this stuff. Mhm.
Lmao, I'm just glad a lot of people believe me.I'm again going to go with my knowledge and experience over yours on this one. Having said that I'm totally OK with you not believing what I commented - but your beliefs don't change facts.
Let alone the very basic fact that you CAN'T Possibly achieve the fab fed racquet specs by adding weight to a stock 90. It's impossible.
Same case with the 97. I posted a pic. I have good sources.
And you call me crazy. This is exactly the problem with these forums.
I just said it in this thread. No need to repeat myself.I can't comment on the PS90 - it was before my time so it would be wrong for me to make guesses. I can only comment on the RF97.
Would you mind letting us know your sources. I'm interested.
I just said it in this thread. No need to repeat myself.
For what?Just so I'm clear - your source it TW and Paul? (nothing against either - love TW and I'm sure Paul is a great guy ... haven't had a chance to meet him yet)
Everything I've said is information that someone competent with basic racquet modification can verify. No sources are even needed to verify that the specs of fed's match stick are not translate able from the stock 90's
Now with these pics, you can easily do the same with the 97. It's math.
Right, because I didn't work for tennis warehouse, and didn't ask those directly in contact with P1. Mhm.
I'll just leave with this one photo I just took ..... a racquet from the same batch as the ones for Roger .... this one is from a couple of months before he switched from the blacked out frame to the first design of the RF97.
I'm not trying to give you a hard time here at all. And I've been happy to debate this with you. It's just that you simply don't have the facts on this and that's fine and not your fault, and that's why I came on here to chime in and post the facts.
PS. Please feel free to make fun of my Wolfgang Puck scale that's all I had on me.
I'll just leave with this one photo I just took ..... a racquet from the same batch as the ones for Roger .... this one is from a couple of months before he switched from the blacked out frame to the first design of the RF97.
I'm not trying to give you a hard time here at all. And I've been happy to debate this with you. It's just that you simply don't have the facts on this and that's fine and not your fault, and that's why I came on here to chime in and post the facts.
PS. Please feel free to make fun of my Wolfgang Puck scale that's all I had on me.
Send me a pm. I'd be glad to meet and I need new hitting partners. I tried being a member at avila and just wasn't happy. Once my wrist heals I'm dieing to have some new people to hit with.So you worked at TW? And Paul is your source? I'm at TW all the time. And I actually know people directly at P1.
So are you still in the SLO area want to meet - have a hit etc? Then we can discuss your theories and I can give you my actual info in person.
It doesn't appear this frame is strung, right? Did it have a grip or OG?
Peter, Peter...The two things I can tell you:
1. I do not know what exact customizations P1 does to his RF97
2. I do know the starting point is a retail RF97 exactly the same as you can buy here on TW
DNS And I had a chat, and I understand what he wast trying to say. Looks like we'll be friends or at least have a few hits, great guy.Peter, Peter...
The retail frame is 340g UNSTRUNG (average).
Strings are 17g
Overgrip is (at least) 7g.
340 + 17 + 7 = 364g
Hence, they either pick frames that are on the light side from the batch or the frame is a pro stock that usually comes lighter for customization, all of it mentioned by Ranch Dressing.
I also recall lead tape at 12 on P1 pictures of Federer's frames.
Do not try to make fools out of people here...
DNS And I had a chat, and I understand what he wast trying to say. Looks like we'll be friends or at least have a few hits, great guy.
I didn't make it clear that the difference is purely in the weight distribution, not in the layup/shape thicknesses/string pattern. So I think from there it's open to each person's interpretation about what that actually means. To me, if I have to void the warranty to get the same weight distribution, that disqualifies the notion that it is the same racquet. But that's just my own interpretation.
DNS was right in that that frame is the same, in the sense that it's not like Novak or Murray where it's a completely different stick. And I agree with that.
I think it's not un-realistic to say wilson hand picks the sticks to be ultra light and sends them to p1 (as a hair pin, minus the pallet obviously), but each person can take their own stance on it from there. I wouldn't be surprised if they just take the same mold+layup and just add weight to it differently for fed. In theory, that is still the same "racquet", but in terms of what the consumer gets... It's a wash.
Corrected it for youFrom what I can gather....Wilson sends P1 a whole heap of the RF97 (the same as the retail model) - probably the lightest ones they can find. P1 then does their thing with the handle, lead tape etc..
So, it is the same frame you can buy in the store, but the specs are different....in a nutshell.
I'm ok with that. Not nearly as bad as rest of Wilson, and Head, and Yonex, and...
Corrected it for you
Nishikori, Dolgopolov, Delpo, Bautista Agut, Gulbis and a few others would agree...
I'll just leave with this one photo I just took ..... a racquet from the same batch as the ones for Roger .... this one is from a couple of months before he switched from the blacked out frame to the first design of the RF97.
I'm not trying to give you a hard time here at all. And I've been happy to debate this with you. It's just that you simply don't have the facts on this and that's fine and not your fault, and that's why I came on here to chime in and post the facts.
PS. Please feel free to make fun of my Wolfgang Puck scale that's all I had on me.
I am not taking any sides here but I think big assumption we make here is Feds actual sw which we have no idea. My argument is that if he dropped 5 grams on his racquet he could have dropped 10-15 units on his sw as well...
Of course is it more likely that PETER Fig is not informed correctly by Wilson? Yes, yes it is...
with strings?
Unstrung ... leather grip only. 340g - right on spec.