after he stated multiple times something to the extend of: "if Nadal wins the US Open, he should be considered #1 player in the world".
First, you don't say things like that before the second week of a grand slam. The same way Jimmy Connors doesn't start working with Roddick until after the clay court season. It's just too risky of a move.
Second, even if Nadal had won the Open, there is this little thing called ranking system, that determines, without anyone's biased opinion, who the best player is at any moment.
Courier seemed to have overplayed his hand. I remember him a couple years back, when he was this unsure of himself, mono-sylabic commentator, who couldn't put a couple of sentences together. Now he is offering judgments as if there were coming from Mount Olimp.
After this magnificent performance by Fed in the final, I hope Courier looks in a mirror and makes the one true insight: "I'm an idiot".
First, you don't say things like that before the second week of a grand slam. The same way Jimmy Connors doesn't start working with Roddick until after the clay court season. It's just too risky of a move.
Second, even if Nadal had won the Open, there is this little thing called ranking system, that determines, without anyone's biased opinion, who the best player is at any moment.
Courier seemed to have overplayed his hand. I remember him a couple years back, when he was this unsure of himself, mono-sylabic commentator, who couldn't put a couple of sentences together. Now he is offering judgments as if there were coming from Mount Olimp.
After this magnificent performance by Fed in the final, I hope Courier looks in a mirror and makes the one true insight: "I'm an idiot".