McEnroeisanartist
Hall of Fame
Federer Fans - Would you rather: he never reaches another Grand Slam 4th Round or a Brutal, Painful Grand Slam final loss (like 2019 Wimbledon final)?
“Multiple votes allowed”
Or that he finally meets Nadal at the USOIf the latter option occurs, it basically means Novak Djokovic will be barely beating a 40-year old man.
(I only expect the Serb to be able to overcome the Swiss in a slam final)
Whoever votes for the first option is nuts lol...
What if it isn't Djokovic, but Zverev? Now that's a painful loss!If the latter option occurs, it basically means Novak Djokovic will be barely beating a 40-year old man.
(I only expect the Serb to be able to overcome the Swiss in a slam final)
Whoa nowI personally handled losses such as those to Seppi or Stakovsky (albeit I almost smashed a fine bottle of whisky after Stakovsky) than those 40-15s. I was over them the next day. Wimby 19 F urks me to this day. So yeah, I voted the first option.
Battle of the grandpas!If the latter option occurs, it basically means Novak Djokovic will be barely beating a 40-year old man.
(I only expect the Serb to be able to overcome the Swiss in a slam final)
Battle of the grandpas!
Old and young grandpas? Sounds like the title of a movieFederer is 6 years older than Novak Djokovic, as you well know.
Novak is Grampovic, Fed is Great-GrampererFederer is 6 years older than Novak Djokovic, as you well know.
Or that he finally meets Nadal at the USO
The cruel defeat in the final doesn't have to be against Djokovic. It could even be vs one of the younger players than finally defeat the big3 en route to their first slamNot when you don't have an option.
I was forced to vote for the 1st option because I've had enough of the 'age' argument and can't stand anymore of that should Federer reach another final and lose to Djokovic.
Djokovic and Nadal did. Federer and Nadal has never happened there. Several times they were on match away, but never crossed pathsDjoker and Rafa have never met at the U.S. Open?
How does that happen?
The cruel defeat in the final doesn't have to be against Djokovic. It could even be vs one of the younger players than finally defeat the big3 en route to their first slam
The cruel defeat in the final doesn't have to be against Djokovic. It could even be vs one of the younger players than finally defeat the big3 en route to their first slam
Great point, it's been total agony being Fed's fan.So Fed fans have now been reduced to voting on who should break his records and when he should lose.
Sad!
After 40-15 you can't hurt me anymore.
Bring the pain.
Welcome to the Federer fan base.Hope he never makes it to the second week at a slam ever again.
I'd still sign up for it. Means I get to watch him still win QF & SF matches.If he reaches another Wimbledon final and loses to Djokovic, it will be painful. You can't deny that Machi.
I'd still sign up for it. Means I get to watch him still win QF & SF matches.
Whoa now
Poor Fed, he really thought he was gonna go out as the head and shoulder GOAT above all past greats. I mean, true, Pete was surpassed in a relatively quick 9 years, but at least he had 7 years of retirement to feel like GOAT. Roger may be surpassed before he even retiresThing is, most honest tennis fans, experts and analysts know he’s 3rd best of the big3.
so would you rather see less fed, or one final epic run followed by his usual Djokovic beating at Wimbledon? A loss makes no difference as we know he’s 3rd wheel anyway. Go out a legend with an epic run aged 40.
Roger claimed GOAThood in 2009. That’s over 11 years until it has been threatened. At least he got to enjoy it a lil longer than Pete.Poor Fed, he really thought he was gonna go out as the head and shoulder GOAT above all past greats. I mean, true, Pete was surpassed in a relatively quick 9 years, but at least he had 7 years of retirement to feel like GOAT. Roger may be surpassed before he even retires
He never got to enjoy it. He always had two players on his heels. People questioning his GOAThood as early as 2009 actually (Mac), and more vocally in 2012 b/of h2h with Rafa.Roger claimed GOAThood in 2009. That’s over 11 years until it has been threatened. At least he got to enjoy it a lil longer than Pete.
Great point, it's been total agony being Fed's fan.
It's never going to be unanimous, but Federer definitely had the majority on his side for a good long while there, same as Pete. Pete was never an unquestioned GOAT. There were always people who had Laver above him and still have it that way to this day.He never got to enjoy it. He always had two players on his heels. People questioning his GOAThood as early as 2009 actually (Mac), and more vocally in 2012 b/of h2h with Rafa.
Pete got to sit on a throne for 10, 8 of them retired years.
Only haters ever questioned his GOAThood all these years. Rafa at the time was never going to be considered GOAT just because of his superior H2H and clay status. Way too many gaps in his resume. Even now at 20 apiece, the majority would still claim RF ahead. Nadal would need to be another 1-2 slams clear to make up for all the holes in his resume. Now Djokovic certainly would have a case at 20 apiece, due to his Federesque-like well-balanced resume.He never got to enjoy it. He always had two players on his heels. People questioning his GOAThood as early as 2009 actually (Mac), and more vocally in 2012 b/of h2h with Rafa.
Pete got to sit on a throne for 10, 8 of them retired years.