Federer is not the greatest athlete ever...

OddJack

G.O.A.T.
Fed-Fan,

Who has suggested that Roger is the greatest athlete of all time that you come running here suggesting otherwise?
Silly title.
 

Andy G

Semi-Pro
Also to Thorpe's credit. As far as I know. He is the only athlete with a town named after him. I live about 1 hour away from Jim Thorpe, PA, USA. Who else will ever have their own town.
 

BorisBeckerFan

Professional
I wonder how any of the atheletes mentioned in this thread would fair in the Roman Colosseum as a gladiator fighting to the death. That taxed almost every athletic category. Strength, speed, agility, jumping, craftiness, witts, hand coordination, stamina, endurance, mental fortitude, etc... These people were in a fight for their lives and I don't mean that figuratively.
 
I wonder how any of the atheletes mentioned in this thread would fair in the Roman Colosseum as a gladiator fighting to the death. That taxed almost every athletic category. Strength, speed, agility, jumping, craftiness, witts, hand coordination, stamina, endurance, mental fortitude, etc... These people were in a fight for their lives and I don't mean that figuratively.

Flavius Maximus was the GOAT... Screw Jim Brown.
 

Tennis_Bum

Professional
nor is MJ, Gretkzy, Tiger, Ali, Bolt, Phelps, etc....

The greatest ever is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Thorpe

When you read about his exploits you understand that what he did was beyond incredible and was never repeated. I guess if Federer could be GOAT of tennis and golf at the same time, you get the drift. The best any of those above names can hope for his #2 behind Thorpe.

If posting is a sport, I will vote you as the "greatest athlete ever" for the # of posts that you manage to put out a day. No one will be able to come close to your talents.
 

Mick

Legend
this why i like the sport of tennis: you don't need to a better athlete to beat the other fellow, you just need to be a better tennis player.
 

boojay

Hall of Fame
Jordan is my top... I cant really argue against the guy. What he could do on the basketball court, we will never see again. He had it all, great skills,leadership could take over whenever he had to, one of the few guards to ever win championships without a dominant big man. I mean had some help with the likes of Pippen and Rodman, but he had trash for centers. Others guy need a great big man. See Kobe with Shaq, Kobe with Gasol, Wade with Shaq etc.

MJ was dealt trash like Purdue, Wennington, Longley for his career.

MJ is hands down the greatest to ever play the game. You can make arguments for Kareem and Wilt but no IMO. There wasnt an aspect in MJ's game that was weak. He could make a subpar team look greater than they really were

As much as I love Fed, I can't argue with this. Jordan is the standard of greatness by which all other athletes are measured against (i.e. he's the Michael Jordan of this or that.)
 

FiveO

Hall of Fame
Golfer's shouldn't be considered athletes heck im in good enough shape to play golf and I haven't done any serious exercise since high school.

Like it or not, what you or I do on a golf course is not what THEY do on a golf course. They are athletes unfit and not, like there are unfit baseball players and relatively unfit tennis players. The hand-eye, balance, timing, torque they create, repetitively, under changing weather conditions, creating shots and concentrating and performing under competitve pressure for long hours for days straight, we tend to take for granted, definitely qualifies it as a sport. Theire abilities are singular, it's the reason Michael Jordan or other great athletes most who have actually played the sport for decades or since high school at least simply can't master it on that level, ever. Sorry while many fail to recognize or appreciate its unique physical and mental demands, golf is most definitely a sport.

5
 
Lol. I guess they don't play sport outside of North America.

It was chosen by American sportswriters, so that explains the lack of international athletes.

BTW, Sampras is #48 on the list (this is before he had 14, since the list is from 2000), and Navratilova is #19, Chris Evert is #50. Bill Tilden is #45.
 

BorisBeckerFan

Professional
Where this a sheer worldwide popularity vote I would venture to say only 3 or 4 of the ones on the espn list would make the top ten with the rest being soccer players like Pele, Zidane etc...
 

380pistol

Banned
If we're going with tennis, Steffi Graf should lead all tennis players, and quite esily. We all know here repetoire as a tennis player, but even during her prime the German Federeration wanted her to quit tennis.

When another tennis player's natie land's governing athletic ability asks then to quit a HOF career mid way through to do another sport, then holla at me. Until then.....

Steffi Graf > anyone who ever hoisted a racquet
 
Last edited:

wangs78

Legend
To the OP: you do realize what the level of competition was like back then, right? The Olympiad allowed amateurs only. His medals were rescinded for a while as he played semi-pro baseball. How would you know there weren't any professional athletes who would have absolutely dominated the same events.

Back then training for sports wasn't as intensive and athletes (and their body types) didn't have to be as specialized for the sport. No one who plays professional football (by that I mean NFL) nowadays would have a chance to be competitive at the high jump. An NFL player would simply have too heavy of a body. If some genetic freak comes along and disproves me: very well. Until then, I can't see it being possible for an athlete to compete in two sports, let alone dominate them. It is not fair to ask athletes to do what Thorpe did in a time where much more dedication to a single sport is required to succeed. What he did was amazing, but I would not necessarily rate him as the Greatest Athlete of All Time due to level of competition.

my two cents.

Well said. I completely agree.
 

britbox

Rookie
A few others that have been overlooked and spring to mind:

Eddy Mercx (cycling)
Steffi Graf (tennis),
Jahingir Khan (squash)
Daley Thompson (athletics - decathlon)
Jackie Joyner-Kersee (athletics)
Carl Lewis (athletics)
Ray Robinson (boxing)
Gareth Edwards (rugby union)
Don Bradman (cricket)
 

coyfish

Hall of Fame
Arguing GOAT in regards to tennis is a big enough stretch in terms of federer's acomplishments. Comparing sports is simply IMPOSSIBLE. You just can't compare athletes from different sports. There are way too many variables.

And just FYI fedfan if you haven't heard (i know you were sarcastic) but kobyashi has lost the last 3 events to an american.
 

Lsmkenpo

Hall of Fame
In terms of pure athletic ability Bo Jackson would be hard to top, A ridiculous combination of speed and strength.
 

deltox

Hall of Fame
the greatest pure athlete since the year 2000 is not gonna be well known for it until his career is deeper and maybe even retired.


Julius Peppers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Peppers

6' 7" 283 lbs.
it takes a serious athlete to play NFL ball at his level. He has better speed at his size than most starting running backs in the league, he was a WALK ON STARTER for the mens basketball team at UNC Chapel Hill. Do i need to discuss the depth of that basketball roster?

State champion SPRINTER ( 6"5" 240lbs at this time of his life) for the High School track team.

His first love is basketball and literally got paid more to play his second sport.

This is probably the best pure athlete of our time currently and possibly ever.

in current tennis that honor would be for noone else but Gael Monfils.
 
Last edited:

deltox

Hall of Fame
A few others that have been overlooked and spring to mind:

Eddy Mercx (cycling)
Steffi Graf (tennis),
Jahingir Khan (squash)
Daley Thompson (athletics - decathlon)
Jackie Joyner-Kersee (athletics)
Carl Lewis (athletics)
Ray Robinson (boxing)
Gareth Edwards (rugby union)
Don Bradman (cricket)

add to that list
michael phelps
Cal Rikpen Jr
Vince Carter
Lance Armstrong
and Wade Boggs and ill agree with your list =)
 

ChanceEncounter

Professional
By what standard are we measuring athletes? Raw athletic ability? Multi-sport mastery? Dominance over peers?

For the first, I definitely have to submit Bo Jackson to the list. That guy was as much of a physical specimen as there ever was.
 
Judged on pure athletic ability for Graf to not even make the list and King to make the top 60 and Evert to make the top 50 is a joke. Evert is an amazing tennis player, but even by her own admission isnt one of the greatest pure athletes, although certainly a good own. King is a very good athlete in some respects, but she is smallish and heavily underpowered physically compared to Graf. Graf should be right up with Navratilova on the list based on pure athletic ability.
 
Actually in terms of pure athletic ability the Williams belong on the list far more than Evert or King, but of course the list was made before this decade. Court is also easily a superior "athlete" to either Evert or King, even if Evert possibly ranks higher all time as a tennis player.
 

bonga77

New User
A few others that have been overlooked and spring to mind:

Eddy Mercx (cycling)
Steffi Graf (tennis),
Jahingir Khan (squash)
Daley Thompson (athletics - decathlon)
Jackie Joyner-Kersee (athletics)
Carl Lewis (athletics)
Ray Robinson (boxing)
Gareth Edwards (rugby union)
Don Bradman (cricket)

Jahingir Khan didnt lose a match for five years. He won 555 matches consecutively
 
Top