French Open: proof that Federer cares but he can't
- Thread starter Mun
- Start date
Same can be said for *******s (see Soderling vs. Nadal RG 09 or Fed vs. Nadal Madrid 09 etc. etc.).
Speranza
Hall of Fame
Watson: My dearest Veroniquem, I commend your devil's advocate response as ever!
However, my suggestion to Mun(dane) was purely to diminish the angst within him for his own sake. He need not develop any acute enthusiasm towards Sir Federer, he merely needs to 'chill out' for his own health. Same advice goes for any Sir Federer/Nadal 'haters'. It is your own health that is being affected by such behaviour.
Toodle pip!
volleynets
Hall of Fame
D
Deleted member 21996
Guest
MUN.. i will have to say...
this new incarnation of yours, the new MUNgo73 is much juicier than the previous one.
please never leave these boards. we need you, like TV needs the Muppet Show...
anyway, this thread is now about Big sized birds...
this new incarnation of yours, the new MUNgo73 is much juicier than the previous one.
please never leave these boards. we need you, like TV needs the Muppet Show...
anyway, this thread is now about Big sized birds...
Last edited by a moderator:
aphex
Banned
Federer threads: proof that Mun cares but he can't
So everytime Mun loses in a Nadal thread it is because he doesn't care and he is focusing on Federer threads? Yeah right
Didn't he care about yesterday's humiliation then? Face it, Mun is vulnerable!!!
So many posters can beat him now on Federer and Nadal threads. Facts, statistics, reality...there are different ways to hurt Mun these days.
All those losses to Drakulie, P_Agony, slicefox, icedevil...were no fluke. Yeah I know the top trolls are harder to beat in Federer threads but it doesn't mean that top trolls don't try their best in other threads!!!
So can we finally agree that all those Mun losses were legit and Mun was truly beaten trying his best???
Also, one of Mun's goals is being number 1 troll and he knows he needs good results in every thread for that. However, it is too late now, Fedface will always be no. 1 troll...
So everytime Mun loses in a Nadal thread it is because he doesn't care and he is focusing on Federer threads? Yeah right
Didn't he care about yesterday's humiliation then? Face it, Mun is vulnerable!!!
So many posters can beat him now on Federer and Nadal threads. Facts, statistics, reality...there are different ways to hurt Mun these days.
All those losses to Drakulie, P_Agony, slicefox, icedevil...were no fluke. Yeah I know the top trolls are harder to beat in Federer threads but it doesn't mean that top trolls don't try their best in other threads!!!
So can we finally agree that all those Mun losses were legit and Mun was truly beaten trying his best???
Also, one of Mun's goals is being number 1 troll and he knows he needs good results in every thread for that. However, it is too late now, Fedface will always be no. 1 troll...
I dont think feds neccesarily tanking either,just not trying as hard as he could.He goes out on the court and plays average level for him which gets him usually to around quaterfinals in masters,but he doesnt really push if he gets in trouble like in the slams.Also he gets more time in slams to cool down a hot opponent in a slam as opposed to best of three in the other tournaments,so really its a combination of limited effort and being beaten.
Yeah of course we all know Nadal owns Fed but that 1st set against Falla was a bad sign for Fed and time proved me right yet again.
Clear example of what a troll is, as well as these:
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=331614
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=323373
TheTruth
G.O.A.T.
Not true. The issue was overscheduling and bad knees. All documented by subsequent withdrawals from the next major and losing an exo to a very lowly ranked player. Sometimes you guys get the word excuse mixed up with untruths.
Thankfully, he learned his lesson this year, but no one can deny that the word mono comes up weekly on this board, and that was what? Two years ago? Even Fed said it was over before it began, but noooo, some of his fans still hold onto it, but I've noticed lately, a lot of times they've changed the word to "sick."
Last edited:
babbette
Legend
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
poor roger. If this isn't caring I don't know what is
Last edited:
zagor
Bionic Poster
Yes,I can deny it.No it doesn't come up weekly,in fact for the last year and a half here I have rarely seen anyone use it.
We hear way more about Nadal's injuries,exhaustion etc. However that is also due to the fact that Nadal has more physical issues than Fed in general due to his game.He also missed Wimbledon while Fed didn't mis such a big tournament in God knows how many years.
babbette
Legend
then look harder.
TheTruth
G.O.A.T.
Are you serious?
05-28-2010, 02:24 PM #63
frisco
Rookie
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 131
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's face it, Nadal probably didn't fake his injuries. But what Fed achieved due to Nadal's absence is equal to what Nadal achieved in 2008 with Fed's injuries (mono + back). It evens out.
05-29-2010, 09:49 PM #18
frisco
Rookie
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 131
________________________________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViscaB
In the same vein let's discount some of Federer's past wins since they were won when Nadal was still a kid.
Then you'd have to throw in all of Nadal's 2008 since Fed had mono
Yesterday, 06:19 AM #259
frisco
Rookie
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 131
________________________________________
^^^ Why has Djokovic never been on fire since?? There have been 8 or 9 slams since. Slump that long? Give me a break. Since AO08 Djoker should only be getting better and getting on fire more. The data indicate otherwise. Fed lost because of mono not because Djoker was on fire.
TheTruth
G.O.A.T.
Ain't that the truth!
TheTruth
G.O.A.T.
Go to search. Put in mono. You'll see a ton of posts from different posters referencing the mono. Most of them from 6/3/10. A year and a half? Try one day.
Why do you persist in this nonsense? Now, I'm sure I'm not being paranoid.
06-03-2010, 07:16 AM #67
Fedbelly
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 108
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semi-Pro
But you forgot one important thing. Fed had mono for a good portion of the 08' season resulting in him losing many important matches and his number one ranking. So, in a sense you could say Nadal was lucky in 08'.
But hey, that's sports...
06-03-2010, 02:42 PM #235
rovex
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,668
________________________________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMF
LOL...I've explained to you a dozen of time already. If you don't believe he's suffering from mono at the 2008 AO, that's ok. We can't convince one another so just let it go.
I never said he didn't have mono, what i said was that using the mono as an excuse is a poor one due to the fact he managed to reach a SF of a major. Not to mention he lost to the eventual winner
Why do you persist in this nonsense? Now, I'm sure I'm not being paranoid.
06-03-2010, 07:16 AM #67
Fedbelly
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 108
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semi-Pro
But you forgot one important thing. Fed had mono for a good portion of the 08' season resulting in him losing many important matches and his number one ranking. So, in a sense you could say Nadal was lucky in 08'.
But hey, that's sports...
06-03-2010, 02:42 PM #235
rovex
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,668
________________________________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMF
LOL...I've explained to you a dozen of time already. If you don't believe he's suffering from mono at the 2008 AO, that's ok. We can't convince one another so just let it go.
I never said he didn't have mono, what i said was that using the mono as an excuse is a poor one due to the fact he managed to reach a SF of a major. Not to mention he lost to the eventual winner
No, true. Jackson vile thinks mono is lame. Then why isn't a knee injury lame? I don't think either are lame actually, but obviously, if you think mono is lame, then so is knee injury. You can't have it both ways.
P_Agony
Banned
So everytime Fed loses in a non Slam event it is because he doesn't care and he is focusing in Slams? Yeah right
Didn't he care about yesterday's match then? Face it, Federer is vulnerable!!!
So many players can beat him now on hardcourts and clay. Big flat hitters, grinders, pushers...there are different ways to hurt Fed these days.
All those losses to Gulbis, Montanes, Baghdatis, Berdych, Benneteau, Del Potro, Davydenko, Djokovic,Tsonga...were no fluke. Yeah I know the top guys are harder to beat in Slams but it doesn't mean that top players don't try their best in other tournaments!!!
So can we finally agree that all those Fed losses were legit and Fed was truly beaten trying his best???
Also, one of Federer's goals is being number 1 and he knows he needs good results in every tournament for that. However, it is too late now, Nadal will be number 1 soon.
Wow, well I guess Federer should thank god he still owns Djokovic, right?
P_Agony
Banned
Brilliant post!!!
What people fail to realize is that Mun is gj011, and that means Djokovic is his favorite player, but Mun is now supporting Nadal because Djokovic is...well...gone.
D
Deleted member 3771
Guest
Fed is saving himself for the London Olympics(singles!), it's the only thing left that he REALLY cares about.
TheTruth
G.O.A.T.
1. I have nothing to do with Jackson vile (great poster, but I don't know him personally).
2. The knee injury is not the issue here. Zagor basically insinuated that I made that statement up. I didn't.
3. I'm not trying to have it any way. I said the mono thing still comes up almost a year and a half later, and it does. It seems to me someone else is trying to have it both ways, but it isn't me.
zagor
Bionic Poster
Ok,I stand corrected,It does seem to appear more time than I thought.However IMO it mainly comes as a response to "Fed only got to #1 and won Wimbledon/FO because of Nadal's injury" thing some Nadal/Sampras fans bring up very often except by Bruce(and his multiple aliases).
TheTruth
G.O.A.T.
You have to stop taking things so personally. As you yourself said, lighten up!
That's much better than insinuating someone is lying.
thalivest
Banned
Not really. The Federer that lost to Soderling was actually playing real tennis unlike those Masters losses where he was dallying around and playing clown tennis. Federer would have crushed Baghdatis, Berdych, Gulbis, Montanes playing like he did vs Soderling. Soderling just played phenomal that day.
zagor
Bionic Poster
I'm not the one taking things personally here,I admitted that I was wrong actually.
However,as I also said IMO mono comments mostly come as a response to "Fed was lucky because of Nadal's knee injury".Meaning Nadal fan will brought up Fed was lucky bla bla bla and the response will be Nadal was also lucky because Fed had mono in 2008 and similar.
I also still believe we hear more about Nadal's various physical problems than Fed's in this forum and in general.
Povl Carstensen
Legend
Wow people are mean and unpleasant here, especially the Nad fans or Fed haters...
TheTruth
G.O.A.T.
I understand that you admitted you were wrong. However, would you have admitted it had I not posted a clear and concise rebuttal?
I'm sorry, I take issue with personal attacks and within the last month you have posted several posts against me in this vein. So, I'm not taking the high road here. I don't care about this entire bolded part. It has nothing to do with me. I simply made a true statement, because I know what I've seen.
Never do I go after a poster personally as I feel you do with me. It is irresponsible and something I would feel embarrassed to do. I am not here to be your friend or agree with anything you say or do. Peer pressure does not exist in my world. I am me, take it or leave it. In your case, I try to leave you alone. I wish the same in return.
This is very true. Mono only comes up AFTER Rafa's knee. Order of operations reveals that *********s are the instigators.
D
Deleted member 21996
Guest
Please excuse Ced... he is french and we all know how the french are Vs Saint Rafa and his supporters...
its all part of the SPECTRE's Plot...
I wasn't talking about Zagor in my post at all, why are you bringing her into this argument? I had an issue with Jackson vile (who I don't think is a great poster), why did you step in then if you had an issue with Zagor? I know the mono thing comes up almost a year and a half later, so do the knee injury ones after a year. So what now? Do you accept both? Or deny both?
TheTruth
G.O.A.T.
I know the mono thing comes up almost a year and a half later, so do the knee injury ones after a year. So what now? Do you accept both? Or deny both?
I didn't step in with Zagor. Read the other posts. I made a harmless comment about the mono because I get tired of seeing people all day long talking about Nadal's knees, he's injured, he's exhausted, blah, blah, blah, especially when we're still hearing about mono two years after the fact.
Zagor came in with bolded letters talking about he/she can deny it. Not a problem really, but maybe it was the tone used.
Regarding this statement, my position is the same as yours. I know the mono and the knees come up constantly too. If one can mention the knees, then it's only fitting that one can mention the mono as well. So, yes I accept that both occur, not just one. That's all. It's cool.
!! Great
About the Zagor thing, I was just surprised, because it seemed like you were replying to Zagor at the same time as replying to me or something... blegh whatever, it's getting all confusing (for me anyways). So yeah, good we sorted that out.
Oh well, hopefully tonight's match will be good.
TheTruth
G.O.A.T.
!! Great
About the Zagor thing, I was just surprised, because it seemed like you were replying to Zagor at the same time as replying to me or something... blegh whatever, it's getting all confusing (for me anyways). So yeah, good we sorted that out.
Oh well, hopefully tonight's match will be good.
It's sounding like one of the most anticipated finals in a long time may be postponed due to rain
. Unbelievable. I hope the meteorologists have it wrong. This is going to be a great match I think.Similar threads
- Poll
