wangs78
Legend
This article is absolutely right. http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/tennis/why-roger-federer-must-retire-to-maintain-his-legacy-8802461.html
A player like Roger should leave the game when he is on top. He should make us all wonder, how many more magic tricks could he have pulled off that we weren't lucky enough to see. It would be better for his legacy. Alas, the perfect moment has passed - he had won Wimbledon last year and was world #1. Had he retired, his storyline would be unrivaled in the pantheon of tennis heroes. 17 Slams. Retired at #1.
Roger, you see, is not Connors, whose legacy was his scrappiness and refusal to go away. Or Agassi whose high level of play despite excruciating back pain became part of his legend. Roger, instead, will always be known for his artistry, his grace, his brilliance. And seeing him fade is nothing short of tragedy.
A player like Roger should leave the game when he is on top. He should make us all wonder, how many more magic tricks could he have pulled off that we weren't lucky enough to see. It would be better for his legacy. Alas, the perfect moment has passed - he had won Wimbledon last year and was world #1. Had he retired, his storyline would be unrivaled in the pantheon of tennis heroes. 17 Slams. Retired at #1.
Roger, you see, is not Connors, whose legacy was his scrappiness and refusal to go away. Or Agassi whose high level of play despite excruciating back pain became part of his legend. Roger, instead, will always be known for his artistry, his grace, his brilliance. And seeing him fade is nothing short of tragedy.