I'm not really into this ranking thingy - so I don't quite get it. So people complain because they are being ranked --higher-- vs. what they feel they should be? I thought the purpose is to get better so if the ranking reflects you are getting better - isn't that a --good-- thing?
I should have been bumped from 3.0 to 3.5 but was changed from 3.0C to 3.0B (Benchmark). I had equal to or better match results to those people on my team. I even had one of my doubles team mates get bumped up to 3.5. Both of us each only had one loss and it was when we were teamed up! I want to move up with my team so I can stay with them. I tried the automatic appeal was rejected. If I appeal to my Section Director will I have any luck getting a Benchmark Rating bumped up?
Why would you appeal a bump up?
Can anyone else appeal your rating? I was bumped up, and my current team is not too happy about it, but I definitely want the new rating. I hope no one else can act on my behalf.
How do you appeal your rating?
How long does it take to find out your results after the appeal? If denied, do they tell you why?
Thanks.
Homey
Correct...I don't think Championship Benchmark ratings can be appealed.
To be able to continue playing on the same team. For many people it is a social thing. It can mean continuing to play with your buddies. It can mean being able to continue playing out of your subdivision (in Atlanta, many teams are based out of subdivisions), whereas there may be no team at the level you have been bumped to.Why would you appeal a bump up?
To be able to continue playing on the same team. For many people it is a social thing. It can mean continuing to play with your buddies. It can mean being able to continue playing out of your subdivision (in Atlanta, many teams are based out of subdivisions), whereas there may be no team at the level you have been bumped to.
Correct...
Eh?Only problem with that is you are being UNFAIR to your opponents. you are too good at that level and you are Unfairly beating the daylights out of people that is just not as good as you...... How can you be so CRUEL ??? Are you willing to dump a few matches or just tank a few to the lesser guys to be fair ?????????
Eh?
I am not sure that I follow your post at all or if it was aimed at me. I just gave a reason why a number of players that I know appealed their rating. I passed no judgment on them either way.
Ratings are barely out and the appeals are starting... for those of you that don't already know, the USTA is severely restricting appeals this year - appeals will be denied for players having played 6 or more matches against rated players in the prior year's qualifying season(s). So if you played more than a handful of matches, your chances of successfully appealing are pretty slim.
To be able to continue playing on the same team. For many people it is a social thing. It can mean continuing to play with your buddies. It can mean being able to continue playing out of your subdivision (in Atlanta, many teams are based out of subdivisions), whereas there may be no team at the level you have been bumped to.
I believe that if you successfully appeal down, you get an "A" rating instead of a "C" rating. An "A" rating is subject to three strikes DQ, whereas a "C" rating is not. If the computer thinks you are a 4.0 and you appeal down to 3.5 and start spanking your opponents, you will accumulate strikes.
Am I understanding this correctly?
I believe that if you successfully appeal down, you get an "A" rating instead of a "C" rating. An "A" rating is subject to three strikes DQ, whereas a "C" rating is not. If the computer thinks you are a 4.0 and you appeal down to 3.5 and start spanking your opponents, you will accumulate strikes.
Am I understanding this correctly?
Why would you appeal a bump up?
I know a guy who just picked up the game for this past doubles season. Never swung a racquet before that (golf was his hobby). Anyway, he self-rated at 3.0 but, because there weren't enough players for a 3.0 division, played up at the 3.5 level. He got partnered with a strong player and was able to win largely by camping out in the alley and letting his partner hit the majority of the balls - together they went 4-2. He got bumped.Why would you appeal a bump up?
But he can't rally longer than one or two shots - and that's on the forehand side. He'll get a backhand back *maybe* once in 5 tries. So...does that sound like a legit 3.5?
I believe that if you successfully appeal down, you get an "A" rating instead of a "C" rating. An "A" rating is subject to three strikes DQ, whereas a "C" rating is not. If the computer thinks you are a 4.0 and you appeal down to 3.5 and start spanking your opponents, you will accumulate strikes.
Am I understanding this correctly?